Supreme Court Upholds CIRP Admission Based on Debt Acknowledgment: Vidyasagar Prasad vs. UCO Bank (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether acknowledgment of debt in balance sheets and One Time Settlement (OTS) proposals can extend the limitation period for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Vidyasagar Prasad vs. UCO Bank & Anr. […]
Supreme Court clarifies limitation for IBC application based on recovery certificates: Totempudi Salalith vs. State Bank of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a financial creditor can initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) based on a recovery certificate issued by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), and what is
Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for IBC Appeals: Sanket Kumar Agarwal vs. APG Logistics (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of limitation period for appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Sanket Kumar Agarwal & Anr vs. APG Logistics Private Limited [Judgment Date]: May 1, 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment:
Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for IBC Applications: Dena Bank vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of limitation period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) and the effect of acknowledgment of debt. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr. Judgment Date:
Supreme Court Clarifies the Role of Balance Sheets in Acknowledging Debt under IBC Date of the Judgment: April 15, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 218 Judges: R.F. Nariman, J., B.R. Gavai, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a company’s balance sheet serve as valid proof of debt acknowledgment, thereby extending the limitation period for initiating insolvency proceedings?
Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for IBC Applications: Sesh Nath Singh vs. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-operative Bank Ltd. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to applications under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, and whether delays in filing such applications can be condoned. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law
Supreme Court Sets Aside Winding Up Order Due to Limitation: Jignesh Shah vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a winding-up petition filed under the Companies Act, 1956, which is time-barred, can be revived as a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Jignesh Shah
