Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 5(13) Archives

Supreme Court Clarifies CIRP Costs and Workmen’s Dues in Insolvency: Sunil Kumar Jain vs. Sundaresh Bhatt (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies CIRP Costs and Workmen’s Dues in Insolvency: Sunil Kumar Jain vs. Sundaresh Bhatt (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of what constitutes “Insolvency Resolution Process Costs” (CIRP costs) and the priority of workmen’s dues during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Sunil Kumar Jain and others vs. Sundaresh […]

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction of NCLT in determining fees of registered valuers post CIRP set aside: Alok Kaushik vs. Mrs Bhuvaneshwari Ramanathan and Others (2021) INSC 143 (15 March 2021)

March 15, 2021 / Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 5(13), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 60(5)(c), Insolvency Resolution Process Costs, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction of NCLT in Determining Fees of Registered Valuers Post CIRP Set Aside Date of the Judgment: 15 March 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 143 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and M.R. Shah, J. Can a registered valuer, appointed during a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), claim their fees if the CIRP

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction of NCLT in determining fees of registered valuers post CIRP set aside: Alok Kaushik vs. Mrs Bhuvaneshwari Ramanathan and Others (2021) INSC 143 (15 March 2021) Read Post »