A.K. Sikri

Supreme Court Clarifies Anti-Dumping Duty Extension Rules: Union of India vs. Kumho Petrochemicals (2017)

/ A.K. Sikri, Anti-Dumping Duty, Ashok Bhushan, Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Customs Tariff Act, 1975 with Section 9A, Customs Tariff Act, 1975 with Section 9A(5), General Clauses Act, 1897, General Clauses Act, 1897 with Section 24, Judges

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the extension of anti-dumping duty can be done after the expiry of the original notification period and whether the initiation of sunset review is valid if the notification is made public after the expiry of the original notification. CASE TYPE: Anti-Dumping Law Case Name: Union of India and Another vs. M/s. Kumho […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Anti-Dumping Duty Extension Rules: Union of India vs. Kumho Petrochemicals (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Recruitment Rules: Ad-hoc Service Not Equivalent to Regular Service in Promotion

/ A.K. Sikri, Ad-hoc Service, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 309, Judges, K.S. Radhakrishnan, Promotion, Recruitment Rules, Service Law

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether ad-hoc service can be counted towards regular service for promotion eligibility. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Shri G.R.Rama Krishna & Anr. Judgment Date: 23rd August, 2013 Date of the Judgment: 23rd August, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 586 Judges: K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. and A.K. Sikri, J.

Supreme Court Upholds Recruitment Rules: Ad-hoc Service Not Equivalent to Regular Service in Promotion Read Post »

Scroll to Top