A.M. Khanwilkar

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of intra-court appeals in corruption cases: Ram Kishan Fauji vs. State of Haryana (21 March 2017)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Criminal Jurisdiction, Dipak Misra, Haryana Lokayukta Act, 2002, Haryana Lokayukta Act, 2002 with Section 14, Haryana Lokayukta Act, 2002 with Section 8(1), Judges, Letters Patent, Letters Patent with Clause 10, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an intra-court appeal is maintainable against a High Court order in a case related to corruption. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Ram Kishan Fauji vs. State of Haryana and Ors. Judgment Date: 21 March 2017 Date of the Judgment: 21 March 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 238 Judges: Dipak Misra, J., A.M. Khanwilkar, […]

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of intra-court appeals in corruption cases: Ram Kishan Fauji vs. State of Haryana (21 March 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Necessary Parties in Writ Petitions Challenging Tribunal Orders: M.S. Kazi vs. Muslim Education Society (2016)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, D.Y. Chandrachud, Gujarat Secondary Education Act 1972, Gujarat Secondary Education Act 1972 with Section 38, Gujarat Secondary Education Act 1972 with Section 39, Judges, Service Law, Service Law with Tribunal, Service Law with Writ Petition, T.S. Thakur

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tribunal is a necessary party in a writ petition challenging its order. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: M.S. Kazi vs. Muslim Education Society & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 22 August 2016 Date of the Judgment: 22 August 2016 Citation: (2016) INSC 798 Judges: T.S. Thakur, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar, J, Dr. D.Y.

Supreme Court Clarifies Necessary Parties in Writ Petitions Challenging Tribunal Orders: M.S. Kazi vs. Muslim Education Society (2016) Read Post »

Medical College Approval: Supreme Court Orders Fresh Inspection in Varunarjun Trust Case (2017)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Amitava Roy, Dipak Misra, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 with Section 10A, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 with Section 19A, Judges

Can a medical college be denied permission based on a single day’s inspection? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving Varunarjun Trust. The court directed a fresh inspection, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment. This case highlights the importance of fair evaluation in medical education. The bench comprised

Medical College Approval: Supreme Court Orders Fresh Inspection in Varunarjun Trust Case (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court disposes of Contempt Petition in land dispute case: Doi Wala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (22 September 2008)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Dinesh Maheshwari, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Offences Relating to Marriage

Okay, I’m ready to continue generating the WordPress blog post based on the provided Supreme Court Judgment. ## Supreme Court disposes of Contempt Petition in land dispute case: Doi Wala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (22 September 2008) “`html Date of the Judgment: 22 September 2008 Case: Doi Wala

Supreme Court disposes of Contempt Petition in land dispute case: Doi Wala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (22 September 2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top