A.S. Bopanna

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act in Arbitration Cases: Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s Tejparas Associates & Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 33, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Order 7 Rule 10, Civil Procedure Code with Order 7 Rule 10A, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act in Arbitration Cases: Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s Tejparas Associates & Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the time spent in a court lacking jurisdiction can be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act when re-presenting a petition in the […]

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 14 of the Limitation Act in Arbitration Cases: Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s Tejparas Associates & Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Expedited Hearing in Rent Dispute: Krishna Devi Maheshwari vs. Surendra Surekha (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Eviction of Tenant, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Banumathi, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 21(1)(a)

Supreme Court Directs Expedited Hearing in Rent Dispute: Krishna Devi Maheshwari vs. Surendra Surekha (2019) Date of the Judgment: October 1, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1129 Judges: R. Banumathi, J., A.S. Bopanna, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a tenant’s repeated adjournments delay a landlord’s right to reclaim their property? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Directs Expedited Hearing in Rent Dispute: Krishna Devi Maheshwari vs. Surendra Surekha (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Scheme Cut-Off Date but Grants Relief in Exceptional Case: Oriental Bank of Commerce vs. Janak Raj Sharma (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Administrative Law, Bank Employees, Employee Rights, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Pension Law, Pension Law with Cut-off Dates, Pension Schemes, R. Banumathi, Retirement Benefits, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Scheme Cut-Off Date but Grants Relief in Exceptional Case: Oriental Bank of Commerce vs. Janak Raj Sharma (2019) Date of the Judgment: 01 October 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1189 Judges: R. Banumathi, J., A.S. Bopanna, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a bank employee who missed the deadline to opt for a

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Scheme Cut-Off Date but Grants Relief in Exceptional Case: Oriental Bank of Commerce vs. Janak Raj Sharma (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Revised Vacancy List in Technical Assistant Recruitment: Anupal Singh vs. State of UP (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, R. Banumathi, Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994, Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 with Section 3(1), Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 with Section 4, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Agriculture Services Rules, 1993, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Agriculture Services Rules, 1993 with Rule 15, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Agriculture Services Rules, 1993 with Rule 6

Supreme Court Upholds Revised Vacancy List in Technical Assistant Recruitment: Anupal Singh vs. State of UP (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a revised requisition of vacancies by the government, after the initial advertisement, is valid if it aims to correct a miscalculation and comply with reservation policies. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Anupal Singh and

Supreme Court Upholds Revised Vacancy List in Technical Assistant Recruitment: Anupal Singh vs. State of UP (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Employee Status of Temporary Worker: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Kumari Arati Saxena (26 September 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Labour Law, Madhya Pradesh Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1963, Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960, Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 with Section 31, Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 with Section 61, Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 with Section 62

Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Employee Status of Temporary Worker: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Kumari Arati Saxena (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a temporary employee, who has worked for more than six months on a vacant post, can be deemed a permanent employee under the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1963. CASE TYPE: Labour

Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Employee Status of Temporary Worker: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Kumari Arati Saxena (26 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reinstates Corruption Case: CBI vs. Pramila Virendra Kumar Agarwal (25 September 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 109, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(e), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2), R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Reinstates Corruption Case: CBI vs. Pramila Virendra Kumar Agarwal (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can discharge an accused at the stage of framing of charges on the ground that the accused was not given an opportunity to explain the source of their assets during investigation and that the sanction for prosecution

Supreme Court Reinstates Corruption Case: CBI vs. Pramila Virendra Kumar Agarwal (25 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders De Novo Inquiry in U.P. Lekhpal Dismissal Case (23 September 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Civil Procedure, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Principles of Natural Justice, R. Banumathi, Service Law, Uttar Pradesh Service Rules, Writ Petition

Supreme Court Orders De Novo Inquiry in U.P. Lekhpal Dismissal Case (23 September 2019) Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 954 Judges: R. Banumathi, J. and A.S. Bopanna, J. Can a disciplinary inquiry be deemed valid if the employee is not given a fair chance to present their case? The Supreme

Supreme Court Orders De Novo Inquiry in U.P. Lekhpal Dismissal Case (23 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies evidence admissibility under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act in Canara Nidhi Limited vs. M. Shashikala (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration Proceedings, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 151, Grounds for Setting Aside Arbitral Award, Judges, R. Banumathi

Can Parties Adduce Evidence in Section 34 Arbitration Cases? Supreme Court Clarifies. Date of the Judgment: September 23, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 924 Judges: R. Banumathi, J. and A.S. Bopanna, J. Can parties present new evidence when challenging an arbitration award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996? The Supreme Court addressed

Supreme Court clarifies evidence admissibility under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act in Canara Nidhi Limited vs. M. Shashikala (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Claim for Personal Use: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Eviction, Judges, Property Law, R. Banumathi, Rent Control, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 with Section 10(3)(a)(iii), Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 with Section 14(1)(b)

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Claim for Personal Use: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a landlord’s claim for eviction for personal use is valid, and what is the relevant date for assessing this requirement. CASE TYPE: Rent Control / Property Law Case Name: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan [Judgment Date]: September

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Claim for Personal Use: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Refund of Security Deposit in Dealership Termination Case: Indian Oil Corporation vs. Lala Bhairo Prasad Saraf and Sons (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Administrative Law, Contract Law, Contract Law with Breach of Contract, Dealership Agreements, Judges, Principles of Natural Justice, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Directs Refund of Security Deposit in Dealership Termination Case: Indian Oil Corporation vs. Lala Bhairo Prasad Saraf and Sons (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in setting aside the termination of a dealership on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice, and the appropriate remedy in such cases.

Supreme Court Directs Refund of Security Deposit in Dealership Termination Case: Indian Oil Corporation vs. Lala Bhairo Prasad Saraf and Sons (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Re-examination of Land Acquisition in Haryana: Krishan Chander vs. State of Haryana (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 48, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Orders Re-examination of Land Acquisition in Haryana: Krishan Chander vs. State of Haryana (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in dismissing the writ petition at the threshold without examining the records relating to land acquisition and possession. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Krishan Chander & Anr. vs. State of

Supreme Court Orders Re-examination of Land Acquisition in Haryana: Krishan Chander vs. State of Haryana (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Labour Court’s Power in Wage Disputes: Rai Bahadur Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. Mangey Ram (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 33-C(2), Judges, Labour Law, R. Banumathi, Reinstatement, Wage Disputes

Supreme Court Limits Labour Court’s Power in Wage Disputes: Rai Bahadur Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. Mangey Ram (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of Labour Court’s power under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in wage disputes. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute (Labour Law). Case Name: Rai Bahadur Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. vs.

Supreme Court Limits Labour Court’s Power in Wage Disputes: Rai Bahadur Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. Mangey Ram (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top