A.S. Bopanna

Supreme Court allows NCLT proceedings to continue in Future Coupons vs. Amazon Dispute (15 February 2022)

Supreme Court Allows NCLT Proceedings to Continue in Future Coupons vs. Amazon Dispute (15 February 2022) Date of the Judgment: 15 February 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: N.V. Ramana (Chief Justice of India), A.S. Bopanna (Justice), Hima Kohli (Justice). The Supreme Court addressed the question of whether to allow the National Company Law […]

Supreme Court allows NCLT proceedings to continue in Future Coupons vs. Amazon Dispute (15 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court orders in Amazon-Future dispute: Future Coupons vs. Amazon (2022)

Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court orders in Amazon-Future dispute: Future Coupons vs. Amazon (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Delhi High Court’s orders enforcing an Emergency Arbitrator’s award were valid, and whether the High Court followed principles of natural justice. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Future Coupons Private Limited & Ors. vs. Amazon.com NV

Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court orders in Amazon-Future dispute: Future Coupons vs. Amazon (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of judicial review in tender processes for foreign-funded projects. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, specifically relating to government tenders and foreign-funded projects. Case Name: National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs. Montecarlo Limited &

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (2022) INSC 124

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (2022) INSC 124 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can interfere with the tender process of a foreign-funded project when the rejection of a bid is based on the decision of the funding agency and

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (2022) INSC 124 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (31 January 2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the tender process of a foreign-funded project. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Process, Foreign Funded Project Case Name: National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. Judgment Date: 31 January 2022 Introduction

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (31 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of LARSGESS Scheme: Chief Personnel Officer vs. A Nishanth George (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of LARSGESS Scheme: Chief Personnel Officer vs. A Nishanth George (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (LARSGESS) scheme was valid and whether claims under the scheme could be entertained after its termination. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Chief Personnel Officer

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of LARSGESS Scheme: Chief Personnel Officer vs. A Nishanth George (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, by re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view on contract interpretation. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Contract Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Limited vs. Union of India (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Limited vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, by re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view, especially on issues of contract termination and compensation for idle machinery.

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Limited vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, by re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view, particularly on matters of contract interpretation, extension of time, and idle

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of “Deputation” in employment contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Deputation Requirements in Employment Contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s overseas travel for a business meeting constitutes a “deputation” requiring them to serve a mandatory period upon return, as per their employment contract. CASE TYPE: Contract Law/Employment Law Case Name: Ms Sarita Singh vs. M/s Shree

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of “Deputation” in employment contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of deputation in employment contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Deputation Requirements in Employment Contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s overseas visit constitutes a deputation requiring them to serve a minimum period upon return, and the consequences of failing to do so. CASE TYPE: Employment Contract Dispute Case Name: Ms Sarita Singh v. M/s Shree Infosoft

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of deputation in employment contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Deputation” in Employment Contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Deputation” in Employment Contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: What constitutes a “deputation” in an employment contract and the obligations of an employee upon return from overseas travel. CASE TYPE: Civil, Employment Contract Dispute Case Name: Ms Sarita Singh vs. M/s Shree Infosoft Private Limited [Judgment Date]: 12 January

Supreme Court Clarifies “Deputation” in Employment Contracts: Sarita Singh vs. Shree Infosoft (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top