Abhay Manohar Sapre

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation on Compensation under Workmen’s Compensation Act: North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation vs. Smt. Sujatha (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indu Malhotra, Interest on Compensation, Judges, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 with Section 30, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 with Section 4A

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation on Compensation under Workmen’s Compensation Act: North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation vs. Smt. Sujatha (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of interest on compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923. CASE TYPE: Labour Law, Workmen’s Compensation Case Name: North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation vs. Smt. Sujatha [Judgment Date]: November 2, […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation on Compensation under Workmen’s Compensation Act: North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation vs. Smt. Sujatha (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Ramvir vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (26 October 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 148, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Murder, Rioting, Unlawful Assembly

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Ramvir vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in convicting the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, when the trial court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Ramvir vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (26 October 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds University’s Right to Evict Retired Employees from Housing: Ranchi University vs. Jharkhand State Housing Board (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Contractual Obligations, Employee Rights, Eviction, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, Retirement Benefits, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds University’s Right to Evict Retired Employees from Housing: Ranchi University vs. Jharkhand State Housing Board (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether retired employees of a university can claim a right to continue occupying university-allotted housing after their retirement, based on a cancelled allotment and subsequent payment to the housing board. CASE TYPE: Civil Law

Supreme Court Upholds University’s Right to Evict Retired Employees from Housing: Ranchi University vs. Jharkhand State Housing Board (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Directs Consideration of Remission: Rajendra Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 25, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Directs Consideration of Remission: Rajendra Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in reversing the acquittal order of the Sessions Judge and convicting the accused for murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Rajendra Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Directs Consideration of Remission: Rajendra Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court on Fair Consideration in State Largesse Disposal: Powai Panchsheel Co-op Hsg. Society vs. MHADA (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Disposal of State Largesse, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority Act, 1976, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court on Fair Consideration in State Largesse Disposal: Powai Panchsheel Co-op Hsg. Society vs. MHADA (2018) Date of the Judgment: October 12, 2018 Citation: Powai Panchsheel Co-op Hsg. Society & Anr. vs. Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 7608 of 2009, (2018) INSC 944 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.,

Supreme Court on Fair Consideration in State Largesse Disposal: Powai Panchsheel Co-op Hsg. Society vs. MHADA (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal in Housing Society Case: Dahisar Saraswati Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appeals, Criminal Procedure Code, Criminal Procedure Code with Section 378(4), Indu Malhotra, Judges, Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, Violations of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal in Housing Society Case: Dahisar Saraswati Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in declining to grant leave to file an appeal against the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Dahisar Saraswati Co-op. Housing Society

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal in Housing Society Case: Dahisar Saraswati Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement, Orders Back Wages for Deceased LIC Employee: Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Sri Kalappa M. Sankad (2018) INSC 886

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Back Wages, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Reinstatement, Service Law, Service Rules, Termination of Service

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement, Orders Back Wages for Deceased LIC Employee: Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Sri Kalappa M. Sankad (2018) INSC 886 Date of the Judgment: 12 October 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 886 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can an employer’s termination order be set aside even if the employee

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement, Orders Back Wages for Deceased LIC Employee: Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Sri Kalappa M. Sankad (2018) INSC 886 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conspiracy Conviction in Murder Case: Bilal Hajar vs. State (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120A, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indu Malhotra, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Conspiracy Conviction in Murder Case: Bilal Hajar vs. State (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appellant was part of a criminal conspiracy to murder the deceased. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police Judgment Date: 10 October 2018 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Conspiracy Conviction in Murder Case: Bilal Hajar vs. State (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case due to lack of conspiracy proof: Dashrath Singh Chauhan vs. CBI (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Criminal Conspiracy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case due to lack of conspiracy proof: Dashrath Singh Chauhan vs. CBI (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a public servant can be convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 when the charge of criminal conspiracy is not proved and the bribe money was accepted by a co-accused. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case due to lack of conspiracy proof: Dashrath Singh Chauhan vs. CBI (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies medical negligence standards in surgery: Dr. S.K. Jhunjhunwala vs. Mrs. Dhanwanti Kaur (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Bolam Test, Consent in Medical Procedures, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 10, Judges, Medical Law, Medical Negligence, Standard of Care, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court clarifies medical negligence standards in surgery: Dr. S.K. Jhunjhunwala vs. Mrs. Dhanwanti Kaur (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the standard of care for medical professionals and whether a doctor was negligent in performing a surgery. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection Case Name: Dr. S.K. Jhunjhunwala vs. Mrs. Dhanwanti Kaur & Anr. [Judgment Date]: October 01,

Supreme Court clarifies medical negligence standards in surgery: Dr. S.K. Jhunjhunwala vs. Mrs. Dhanwanti Kaur (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the role of Revisionary Court in eviction cases: Hiya Associates vs. Nakshatra Properties (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41, Eviction, Execution of Decree, Judges, Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 with Section 16(1)(n), Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

Supreme Court clarifies the role of Revisionary Court in eviction cases: Hiya Associates vs. Nakshatra Properties (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the appropriate procedure for a Revisionary Court to follow when reviewing an order from an Executing Court in an eviction case. CASE TYPE: This case falls under the ambit of

Supreme Court clarifies the role of Revisionary Court in eviction cases: Hiya Associates vs. Nakshatra Properties (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Exemption Under Kerala Private Forests Act: State of Kerala vs. Joseph (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Exemption from Vesting, Judges, Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 with Section 3(2), Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 with Section 3(3), Land Law, Land Ownership, Land Vesting, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Exemption Under Kerala Private Forests Act: State of Kerala vs. Joseph (2018) Date of the Judgment: September 25, 2018 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. This was a unanimous decision by a two-judge bench. Can a landowner be exempted from the vesting of

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Exemption Under Kerala Private Forests Act: State of Kerala vs. Joseph (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top