Abhay Manohar Sapre

Supreme Court Remands Maintenance Case: Harish Chand vs. Smt. Urmila (20 September 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Family Law, Judges, Maintenance, Revision Petitions, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Remands Maintenance Case: Harish Chand vs. Smt. Urmila (20 September 2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court correctly dismissed a revision petition regarding a maintenance order without proper reasoning. CASE TYPE: Family Law – Maintenance Case Name: Harish Chand vs. Smt. Urmila Judgment Date: 20 September 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 […]

Supreme Court Remands Maintenance Case: Harish Chand vs. Smt. Urmila (20 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights for Municipality Employees: Una Nagar Palika vs. Kaliben Balubhai Makwana (20 September 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Civil Service Law, Judges, Municipal Employees, Pension Eligibility, Pension Law, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights for Municipality Employees: Una Nagar Palika vs. Kaliben Balubhai Makwana (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of a municipality are entitled to pension benefits, regardless of whether they were directly appointed or previously worked with a Panchayat. CASE TYPE: Civil Service/Pension Law Case Name: Una Nagar Palika vs. Kaliben Balubhai Makwana

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights for Municipality Employees: Una Nagar Palika vs. Kaliben Balubhai Makwana (20 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Non-Parties in Land Dispute: Ashok Singh vs. State of UP (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Judges, Parties to Suit, Right to Appeal, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Non-Parties in Land Dispute: Ashok Singh vs. State of UP (2018) Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 776 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. and Vineet Saran, J. Can individuals who were not originally involved in a legal dispute challenge the final order? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Non-Parties in Land Dispute: Ashok Singh vs. State of UP (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Re-Hearing of Land Acquisition Appeals: Mysore Urban Development Authority vs. K.M. Chikkathayamma (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Judges, Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987, Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 17(1), Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 18(3), Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 19(7), Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 12(2), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16(2), S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Orders Re-Hearing of Land Acquisition Appeals: Mysore Urban Development Authority vs. K.M. Chikkathayamma (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in dismissing the appeals filed by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) as withdrawn based on a resolution by MUDA. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Civil Case Name: Mysore Urban Development Authority

Supreme Court Orders Re-Hearing of Land Acquisition Appeals: Mysore Urban Development Authority vs. K.M. Chikkathayamma (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the evidentiary value of co-accused statements under NDPS Act: Surinder Kumar Khanna vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 25, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 30, Judges, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 21, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 29, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 67, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court on the Admissibility of Co-accused Statements in NDPS Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Admissibility and evidentiary value of a co-accused’s statement under Section 67 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, NDPS Act Case Name: Surinder Kumar Khanna vs. Intelligence Officer Directorate of Revenue Intelligence [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court clarifies the evidentiary value of co-accused statements under NDPS Act: Surinder Kumar Khanna vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Gangabishan Case (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Criminal Law, Culpable Homicide, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, Murder, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Gangabishan Case (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused had the intention to commit murder or cause bodily injury likely to cause death. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Gangabishan @ Vishnu & Ors. Judgment Date: 27 July 2018 Date of the

Supreme Court Reduces Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Gangabishan Case (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores 50% Deduction for Land Development Charges in Land Acquisition Case: Union of India vs. Dyagala Devamma & Ors. (25 July 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Restores 50% Deduction for Land Development Charges in Land Acquisition Case Date of the Judgment: 25 July 2018 Citation: Union of India vs. Dyagala Devamma & Ors. (2018) INSC 682 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Uday Umesh Lalit, J. Can the High Court reduce the deduction for developmental charges when acquiring land? The

Supreme Court Restores 50% Deduction for Land Development Charges in Land Acquisition Case: Union of India vs. Dyagala Devamma & Ors. (25 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Due to Irretrievable Breakdown: Manju Kumari Singh vs. Avinash Kumar Singh (25 July 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Divorce, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Due to Irretrievable Breakdown: Manju Kumari Singh vs. Avinash Kumar Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a marriage can be dissolved due to irretrievable breakdown when the parties have been living separately for a long time and there is no possibility of reconciliation. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Law Case Name: Manju Kumari Singh

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Due to Irretrievable Breakdown: Manju Kumari Singh vs. Avinash Kumar Singh (25 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Discharge Petition in Dowry Harassment Case: Nayan Prasad vs. State of Bihar (20 July 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 245, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Offences Against Women, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Discharge Petition in Dowry Harassment Case: Nayan Prasad vs. State of Bihar (2018) Date of the Judgment: 20 July 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can in-laws facing charges of dowry harassment seek a discharge based on a technicality, delaying a trial? The

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Discharge Petition in Dowry Harassment Case: Nayan Prasad vs. State of Bihar (20 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Overtime Wages for Currency Press Employees: Currency Note Press vs. N.N. Sardesai (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Factories Act, 1948, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Overtime Wages for Currency Press Employees: Currency Note Press vs. N.N. Sardesai (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the Labour Court’s order and allowing the employees’ claim for overtime wages. CASE TYPE: Labour Law. Case Name: Currency Note Press & Anr. vs. N.N. Sardesai & Ors.

Supreme Court Upholds Overtime Wages for Currency Press Employees: Currency Note Press vs. N.N. Sardesai (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage on Mutual Terms, Orders Alimony: Usha Uday Khiwansara vs. Uday Kumar Jethmal Khiwansara (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage on Mutual Terms, Orders Alimony: Usha Uday Khiwansara vs. Uday Kumar Jethmal Khiwansara (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a marriage can be dissolved by the Supreme Court using its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, even when the High Court granted a divorce ex-parte without hearing the wife, and if so,

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage on Mutual Terms, Orders Alimony: Usha Uday Khiwansara vs. Uday Kumar Jethmal Khiwansara (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. T. Natarajan (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Administrative Law, Arbitration, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 226, Constitution of India with Article 227, Contract Law, Dealership Agreements, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. T. Natarajan (2018) Date of the Judgment: July 17, 2018 Citation: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Anr. v. T. Natarajan, Civil Appeal No. 6748 of 2018, arising out of SLP (C) No. 33100 of 2015 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Uday Umesh Lalit, J.

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. T. Natarajan (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top