Abhay Manohar Sapre

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction on Commission Payments to Advertising Agencies: Prasar Bharati vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Commission, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 194H, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 201, Judges, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction on Commission Payments to Advertising Agencies: Prasar Bharati vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2018) Date of the Judgment: April 03, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 258 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J. and Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can payments made by a television channel to advertising agencies be considered as “commission,” thus requiring […]

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction on Commission Payments to Advertising Agencies: Prasar Bharati vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Murder Sentence to Life Imprisonment: Bharatkumar Rameshchandra Barot vs. State of Gujarat (26 March 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appeals, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 377, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Enhances Murder Sentence to Life Imprisonment: Bharatkumar Rameshchandra Barot vs. State of Gujarat (2018) Date of the Judgment: 26 March 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 232 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can a court impose a jail sentence less than life imprisonment for a murder conviction under Section 302 of the

Supreme Court Enhances Murder Sentence to Life Imprisonment: Bharatkumar Rameshchandra Barot vs. State of Gujarat (26 March 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Gorusu Nagaraju vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 235(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Gorusu Nagaraju vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether circumstantial evidence was sufficient to uphold a conviction for murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Gorusu Nagaraju vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Judgment Date: 23 March 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Gorusu Nagaraju vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows gratuity claim for employee with continuous service: Netram Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Continuous Service, Judges, Labour Law, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2(e), Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2A, R. K. Agrawal, Regularization of Service

Supreme Court allows gratuity claim for employee with continuous service: Netram Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee is eligible for gratuity for the entire period of service including the period as a daily wager, when the services were subsequently regularized. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Netram Sahu vs. State

Supreme Court allows gratuity claim for employee with continuous service: Netram Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Counter FIR in Fraud Case: P. Sreekumar vs. State of Kerala (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 465, Judges, Multiple FIRs, Offences Relating to Property, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Allows Counter FIR in Fraud Case: P. Sreekumar vs. State of Kerala (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a second FIR is maintainable if it is a counter-complaint arising from the same incident. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: P. Sreekumar vs. State of Kerala & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 19, 2018 Date of the

Supreme Court Allows Counter FIR in Fraud Case: P. Sreekumar vs. State of Kerala (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: Sivakami vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appellate Procedure, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, R.K. Agrawal, Reasoned Judgments, Review Application

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: Sivakami vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can dismiss a writ petition without providing reasons after setting aside the order of the Single Judge which had also not provided reasons. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Sivakami & Ors. vs. State of Tamil

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: Sivakami vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition After Delay: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Condonation of Delay, Judges, Order XLVII, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Procedural Law, Review Petition, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition After Delay: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in curing defects in a review application should lead to its dismissal. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary (Revenue) & Anr. [Judgment Date]: March

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition After Delay: Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Condones Delay Due to Illness in Family Dispute Appeal: Ummer vs. Pottengal Subida (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX Rule 13, Judges, Limitation Act, Limitation Act with Section 5, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Condones Delay Due to Illness in Family Dispute Appeal: Ummer vs. Pottengal Subida (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in filing an appeal can be condoned due to the appellant’s illness. CASE TYPE: Family Law Case Name: Ummer vs. Pottengal Subida & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 08, 2018 Date of the Judgment: March

Supreme Court Condones Delay Due to Illness in Family Dispute Appeal: Ummer vs. Pottengal Subida (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds GSRTC’s Stance on Badli Kamdar Absorption: Bhupendra Kumar vs. GSRTC (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Badli Kamdar, Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation, Industrial Disputes Act, Industrial Disputes Act with Section 18, Industrial Disputes Act with Section 25C, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds GSRTC’s Stance on Badli Kamdar Absorption: Bhupendra Kumar vs. GSRTC (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether “Badli Kamdars” are entitled to permanent absorption and time-scale benefits from their initial date of joining or from the date of actual absorption into a permanent position. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Bhupendra Kumar Chimanbhai Kachiya Patel

Supreme Court Upholds GSRTC’s Stance on Badli Kamdar Absorption: Bhupendra Kumar vs. GSRTC (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of appeal in trust property dispute: B. Muthukrishnan vs. S.T. Reddiar Educational & Charitable Trust (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Interim Orders, Judges, Order XLI, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, R. K. Agrawal, Trust Disputes

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of appeal in trust property dispute: B. Muthukrishnan vs. S.T. Reddiar Educational & Charitable Trust (2018) Date of the Judgment: February 23, 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: R. K. Agrawal, J. and Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can interim orders of a High Court be challenged in the Supreme Court? The

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of appeal in trust property dispute: B. Muthukrishnan vs. S.T. Reddiar Educational & Charitable Trust (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Payment Despite Appeal Win: Rajeshwar Mahto vs. Birla Corporation Ltd. (2018) INSC 129

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 17-B, Interim Orders, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, Workman

Supreme Court Orders Payment Despite Appeal Win in Birla Corporation Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employer is obligated to comply with an interim order for payment of wages under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, even if the employer wins the main appeal. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute, Contempt Case Name: Rajeshwar Mahto vs.

Supreme Court Orders Payment Despite Appeal Win: Rajeshwar Mahto vs. Birla Corporation Ltd. (2018) INSC 129 Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Second Appeal Due to Procedural Errors: Surat Singh vs. Siri Bhagwan (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Indian Judiciary, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, Second Appeal, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Remands Second Appeal Due to Procedural Errors: Surat Singh vs. Siri Bhagwan (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Procedural compliance in second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Surat Singh (Dead) vs. Siri Bhagwan & Ors. Judgment Date: 19 February 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Remands Second Appeal Due to Procedural Errors: Surat Singh vs. Siri Bhagwan (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top