Abhay Manohar Sapre

Supreme Court Denies Back Wages to Reinstated Employee: Karupaiah vs. Thruuvalluvar Transport Corporation (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee is automatically entitled to back wages upon reinstatement after being acquitted of a criminal charge. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: P. Karupaiah (D) Thr.Lrs. vs. The General Manager Thruuvalluvar Transport Corporation Ltd. Judgment Date: 12 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 12 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 884 Judges: […]

Supreme Court Denies Back Wages to Reinstated Employee: Karupaiah vs. Thruuvalluvar Transport Corporation (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Patta: Nagar Palika Raisinghnagar vs. Rameshwar Lal (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person can claim permanent injunction on the basis of a Patta granted to their predecessor-in-title. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: Nagar Palika Raisinghnagar vs. Rameshwar Lal & Anr. Judgment Date: 10 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 10 October 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No.10833 of 2010 Judges:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Patta: Nagar Palika Raisinghnagar vs. Rameshwar Lal (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement: Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy vs. Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao (2017)

Can a prior agreement to sell property be nullified by a subsequent sale? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a dispute over a house sale agreement. The Court examined the validity of competing agreements and the readiness of the parties to fulfill their obligations. This case highlights the importance

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement: Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy vs. Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Wakf Board’s Ownership, Dismisses Adverse Possession Claim: Dharampal vs. Punjab Wakf Board (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a claim of adverse possession can be used to claim ownership of Wakf property and whether a civil suit is barred by Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 if a previous suit on the same matter was dismissed for default. CASE TYPE: Property Law, Wakf Law Case

Supreme Court Upholds Wakf Board’s Ownership, Dismisses Adverse Possession Claim: Dharampal vs. Punjab Wakf Board (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Claiming Ownership of Ancient Temple: State of Uttarakhand vs. Mandir Sri Laxman Sidh Maharaj (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a private individual can claim ownership of a heritage temple and surrounding land based on adverse possession without proper pleadings and evidence. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: State of Uttarakhand & Anr. vs. Mandir Sri Laxman Sidh Maharaj Judgment Date: September 12, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Claiming Ownership of Ancient Temple: State of Uttarakhand vs. Mandir Sri Laxman Sidh Maharaj (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of LIC Employee in Fraud Case: Mihir Kumar Hazara Choudhury vs. Life Insurance Corpn. & Anr. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the dismissal of an employee for issuing receipts without receiving payment is justified. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Mihir Kumar Hazara Choudhury vs. Life Insurance Corpn. & Anr. Judgment Date: 11 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 11 September 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 788 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Abhay Manohar

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of LIC Employee in Fraud Case: Mihir Kumar Hazara Choudhury vs. Life Insurance Corpn. & Anr. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Bail for Ryan School Trustees in Murder Case (11 December 2017)

Can the top management of a school be granted interim bail when a student is murdered on the school premises? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question while hearing an appeal against the grant of interim bail to the trustees of Ryan International School. The court upheld the High Court’s decision to grant interim

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Bail for Ryan School Trustees in Murder Case (11 December 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies remedy against Lok Adalat awards: Bhargavi Constructions vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil suit is maintainable to challenge an award passed by the Lok Adalat or if the only remedy is a writ petition. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Bhargavi Constructions & Anr. vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy & Ors. [Judgment Date]: September 7, 2017 Date of the Judgment: September 7, 2017 Citation: (2017)

Supreme Court clarifies remedy against Lok Adalat awards: Bhargavi Constructions vs. Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Family Property Dispute: Adiveppa vs. Bhimappa (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of self-acquired vs. ancestral property in a Hindu family. CASE TYPE: Civil property dispute. Case Name: Adiveppa & Ors. vs. Bhimappa & Anr. [Judgment Date]: September 6, 2017 Date of the Judgment: September 6, 2017. Citation: (2017) INSC 782. Judges: Justice R.K. Agrawal and Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre. The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Family Property Dispute: Adiveppa vs. Bhimappa (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court modifies termination order of Maharashtra Law Officers: State of Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Kishor M. Gadhave Patil & Ors. (2017) INSC 723 (05 September 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the termination of Law Officers by the State Government was valid under the Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointments, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Kishor M. Gadhave Patil & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 05 September 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court modifies termination order of Maharashtra Law Officers: State of Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Kishor M. Gadhave Patil & Ors. (2017) INSC 723 (05 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Confiscation of Sandalwood: State of Kerala vs. Jossy Sequeria (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the confiscation of a vehicle and sandalwood under Section 61-A of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961 is valid when the goods are not proven to belong to the State of Kerala and were being transported from another state. CASE TYPE: Forest Law Case Name: State of Kerala vs. Jossy Sequeria Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Confiscation of Sandalwood: State of Kerala vs. Jossy Sequeria (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Second Chance for Written Statement in Civil Suit: Siddalingayya vs. Gurulingappa (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a trial court should allow a defendant to file a written statement after the initial time has expired. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Siddalingayya vs. Gurulingappa & Ors. Judgment Date: 05 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 772 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.

Supreme Court Allows Second Chance for Written Statement in Civil Suit: Siddalingayya vs. Gurulingappa (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top