Abhay S. Oka

Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Compassionate Appointees over Direct Recruits in Engineering Services

Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Compassionate Appointees over Direct Recruits in Engineering Services LEGAL ISSUE: Whether compassionate appointees are entitled to seniority over direct recruits in the Tamil Nadu Highways Engineering Service. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: M. Kendra Devi vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu and Others Judgment Date: 10 March 2022 Introduction […]

Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Compassionate Appointees over Direct Recruits in Engineering Services Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Reject Highest Bid in Public Auction: State of Punjab vs. Mehar Din (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Reject Highest Bid in Public Auction: State of Punjab vs. Mehar Din (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State is bound to accept the highest bid in a public auction. CASE TYPE: Public Auction/Contract Law Case Name: State of Punjab & Others vs. Mehar Din [Judgment Date]: March 2, 2022

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Reject Highest Bid in Public Auction: State of Punjab vs. Mehar Din (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition: Naseema Khan vs. Rahul Singh (25 February 2022)

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Naseema Khan vs. Rahul Singh (2022) Date of the Judgment: 25 February 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 237 Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka The Supreme Court of India addressed a transfer petition in the case of Naseema Khan vs. Rahul Singh. This case involved a request to transfer a case

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition: Naseema Khan vs. Rahul Singh (25 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Dehradun: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal (2022)

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Dehradun: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of Matrimonial Suit CASE TYPE: Family Law Case Name: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal [Judgment Date]: February 25, 2022 Date of the Judgment: February 25, 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka Can a divorce petition be

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Dehradun: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Naseema Khan v. Rahul Singh (2022)

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Naseema Khan v. Rahul Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Withdrawal of Transfer Petition. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: Naseema Khan v. Rahul Singh. [Judgment Date]: February 25, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 25, 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka Can a petitioner withdraw a transfer

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Naseema Khan v. Rahul Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Dehradun: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal (25 February 2022)

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Dehradun: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of Matrimonial Suit CASE TYPE: Family Law, Transfer Petition Case Name: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal [Judgment Date]: 25 February 2022 Date of the Judgment: 25 February 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka Can a matrimonial

Supreme Court Transfers Divorce Case to Dehradun: Manisha Jain vs. Rajeev Jindal (25 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Transfer Order in Property Dispute: Himalaya Distilleries vs. Urmila Pradhan (2022)

Supreme Court Modifies Transfer Order in Property Dispute: Himalaya Distilleries vs. Urmila Pradhan (2022) Date of the Judgment: February 25, 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka Can a procedural error in a court order be rectified to ensure the case proceeds in the correct jurisdiction? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Supreme Court Modifies Transfer Order in Property Dispute: Himalaya Distilleries vs. Urmila Pradhan (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Damages for EPF Default: Horticulture Experiment Station vs. Regional Provident Fund Organization (23 February 2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Damages for EPF Default: Horticulture Experiment Station vs. Regional Provident Fund Organization (2022) Date of the Judgment: 23 February 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No(s). 2136 of 2012 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Abhay S. Oka. Can an employer avoid paying damages for late Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) contributions by claiming a

Supreme Court Upholds Damages for EPF Default: Horticulture Experiment Station vs. Regional Provident Fund Organization (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits Commercial Tax Officer in bribery case: K. Shanthamma vs. State of Telangana (21 February 2022)

Supreme Court acquits Commercial Tax Officer in bribery case: K. Shanthamma vs. State of Telangana (2022) Date of the Judgment: 21 February 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 158 Judges: Ajay Rastogi, J., Abhay S. Oka, J. Can a public servant be convicted for accepting a bribe if the demand for the bribe is not clearly proven?

Supreme Court acquits Commercial Tax Officer in bribery case: K. Shanthamma vs. State of Telangana (21 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Bank Officer in Cash Theft Case: UCO Bank vs. Krishna Kumar Bhardwaj (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Bank Officer in Cash Theft Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in interfering with the disciplinary proceedings against a bank officer for negligence leading to theft. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Regional Manager, UCO Bank and Another vs. Krishna Kumar Bhardwaj Judgment Date: 18

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Bank Officer in Cash Theft Case: UCO Bank vs. Krishna Kumar Bhardwaj (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds UCO Bank’s Disciplinary Action Against Employee for Misconduct: General Manager(Operation-1) vs. Krishna Kumar Bhardwaj (2022)

UCO Bank Employee Misconduct: Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Date of the Judgment: February 18, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1458 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Abhay S. Oka Can a disciplinary inquiry be set aside if the charges are deemed vague? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case concerning

Supreme Court Upholds UCO Bank’s Disciplinary Action Against Employee for Misconduct: General Manager(Operation-1) vs. Krishna Kumar Bhardwaj (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Bank Manager for Misconduct: General Manager, UCO Bank vs. Krishna Kumar Bhardwaj (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Bank Manager for Misconduct LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with disciplinary proceedings when the inquiry was conducted as per procedure and the charges were not vague. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: General Manager(Operation-1)/Appellate Authority, UCO Bank & Ors. vs. Krishna Kumar Bhardwaj [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Bank Manager for Misconduct: General Manager, UCO Bank vs. Krishna Kumar Bhardwaj (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top