Abhay S. Oka

Supreme Court Clarifies Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail and Remission in Criminal Law (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 18, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 239 Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan Can the government grant remission to convicts without an application from them? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this crucial question while examining the policies and procedures for granting bail and remission to convicts. […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail and Remission in Criminal Law (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the validity of Rule 21(8) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Rules, 2005: State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Trishala Alloys Pvt. Ltd. (2025) INSC 231 (17 February 2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 17 February 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 231 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J. Can a state government implement tax rules without the explicit authority in the primary tax law? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a case concerning the Punjab Value Added Tax

Supreme Court settles the validity of Rule 21(8) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Rules, 2005: State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Trishala Alloys Pvt. Ltd. (2025) INSC 231 (17 February 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Damages for Non-Performing Machinery: Sahakarmaharshi Bhausaheb Thorat vs. Thyssenkrupp (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 14, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 219 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J. When a plant doesn’t perform as promised, who bears the cost? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a dispute over non-performing machinery supplied for a continuous fermentation process. The court examined

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Damages for Non-Performing Machinery: Sahakarmaharshi Bhausaheb Thorat vs. Thyssenkrupp (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits appellant in murder case due to circumstantial evidence: Vinod Kumar vs. State (2025) INSC 209 (13 February 2025)

Date of the Judgment: 13 February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 209 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J. Can a conviction for murder be sustained solely on circumstantial evidence if critical pieces of that evidence are questionable? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Vinod Kumar vs. State (Govt.

Supreme Court acquits appellant in murder case due to circumstantial evidence: Vinod Kumar vs. State (2025) INSC 209 (13 February 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Alimony Rights in Void Marriages: Sukhdev Singh vs. Sukhbir Kaur (2025)

Date of the Judgment: February 12, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 197 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J., Augustine George Masih, J. Can a person whose marriage is legally declared void still claim alimony from their former spouse? This crucial question was addressed by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Sukhdev

Supreme Court Clarifies Alimony Rights in Void Marriages: Sukhdev Singh vs. Sukhbir Kaur (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court: Violation of Article 22(1) renders arrest illegal in Vihaan Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 07, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 162 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. Can an arrest be deemed illegal if the arrested person is not informed of the grounds for their arrest? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in Vihaan Kumar vs. State

Supreme Court: Violation of Article 22(1) renders arrest illegal in Vihaan Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on extra-judicial confession in murder case: Ramu Appa Mahapatar vs. State of Maharashtra (2025)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 04, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 147 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J. In cases of murder, can a conviction be solely based on an extra-judicial confession? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in Ramu Appa Mahapatar vs. The State of Maharashtra, examining the evidentiary

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on extra-judicial confession in murder case: Ramu Appa Mahapatar vs. State of Maharashtra (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits husband in dowry death case: Karan Singh vs. State of Haryana (2025) INSC 133

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the husband subjected his wife to cruelty or harassment for dowry, leading to her death. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Dowry Death Case Name: Karan Singh vs. State of Haryana [Judgment Date]: January 31, 2025 Date of the Judgment: January 31, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 133

Supreme Court acquits husband in dowry death case: Karan Singh vs. State of Haryana (2025) INSC 133 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Clause Barring Damages in Construction Contract: C & C Constructions vs. IRCON International (2025)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a clause in a construction contract can validly bar a contractor from claiming damages for delays caused by the employer. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s. C & C Constructions Ltd. vs. IRCON International Ltd. [Judgment Date]: 31 January 2025 Date of the Judgment: 31 January 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 138

Supreme Court Upholds Clause Barring Damages in Construction Contract: C & C Constructions vs. IRCON International (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case based on unreliable eyewitness testimony: Vinobhai vs. State of Kerala (29 January 2025)

Date of the Judgment: 29 January 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 119 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J. and Ujjal Bhuyan, J. Can a conviction for murder stand when the eyewitness accounts are riddled with inconsistencies and omissions? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a criminal appeal, ultimately acquitting the accused. This

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case based on unreliable eyewitness testimony: Vinobhai vs. State of Kerala (29 January 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Contractual Interpretation: Somdatt Builders vs. NHAI (27 January 2025)

LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of contract clauses regarding variations in quantity of work. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Somdatt Builders –NCC – NEC(JV) vs. National Highways Authority of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 27 January 2025 Date of the Judgment: 27 January 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 113 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J. and Ujjal Bhuyan,

Supreme Court Settles Contractual Interpretation: Somdatt Builders vs. NHAI (27 January 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Levy Royalty on Brick Earth Mining(2025)

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Levy Royalty on Brick Earth Mining: State of Punjab vs. Om Prakash Brick Kiln Owners (2025) Date of the Judgment: January 21, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 88 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J. and Ujjal Bhuyan, J. Can a state government levy royalty on the extraction of brick earth, even

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Levy Royalty on Brick Earth Mining(2025) Read Post »

Scroll to Top