Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action in Tender Tampering Case: Indian Oil Corporation vs. Ajit Kumar Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of judicial review in disciplinary proceedings. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Indian Oil Corporation & Ors. vs. Ajit Kumar Singh & Anr. Judgment Date: 17 May 2023 Date of the Judgment: 17 May […]
Supreme Court Holds Naveen Sharma in Contempt for Defying Child Custody Order (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Contempt of Court for non-compliance with orders regarding child custody. CASE TYPE: Contempt Jurisdiction Case Name: Meenal Bhargava vs. Naveen Sharma & Ors. Judgment Date: May 16, 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 16, 2023 Citation: Not Available in
Supreme Court Punishes Contemnor for Defying Orders in Child Custody Case LEGAL ISSUE: Contempt of Court for failing to comply with orders regarding child custody. CASE TYPE: Contempt Jurisdiction Case Name: Meenal Bhargava vs. Naveen Sharma & Ors. Judgment Date: May 16, 2023 Date of the Judgment: May 16, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 540 Judges:
Supreme Court upholds conviction in gruesome murder case: Kallu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct to uphold the conviction of the accused for murder based on eyewitness testimony and circumstantial evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Kallu vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [Judgment Date]: May 15,
Supreme Court grants probation in gambling case: Soori vs. State of Karnataka (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person convicted under Section 80 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963 for gambling can be granted probation. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Soori @ T.V. Suresh v. The State of Karnataka [Judgment Date]: May 15, 2023 Date of
Supreme Court grants probation in gambling case under Karnataka Police Act: Soori vs. State (2023) INSC 535 (15 May 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person convicted under Section 80 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963 for gambling can be granted probation instead of imprisonment. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Soori @ T.V. Suresh vs.
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Gruesome Murder Case: Kallu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction of the accused for murder was justified based on the evidence presented. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Kallu vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh Judgment Date: May 15, 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May
Supreme Court quashes conviction due to Section 313 CrPC violation in criminal conspiracy case Date of the Judgment: 11 May 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 478 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a conviction be upheld when a crucial piece of evidence against the accused was not presented to them during their examination
Supreme Court quashes conviction due to Section 313 CrPC violation: Raj Kumar vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction can be upheld when a crucial piece of evidence against the accused was not presented to them during their examination under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case
Supreme Court Upholds Admission of Insolvency Application: M. Suresh Kumar Reddy vs. Canara Bank (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has discretion to reject an application for the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IB Code) once a financial debt
Supreme Court Upholds Admission of Insolvency Application: M. Suresh Kumar Reddy vs. Canara Bank (2023) Date of the Judgment: May 11, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 521 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a corporate debtor avoid insolvency proceedings by claiming the creditor should have extended bank guarantees? The Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court refers the issue of limitation for delivery of possession to a larger bench: Bhasker & Anr. vs. Ayodhya Jewellers (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: What is the correct starting point for calculating the limitation period for an application seeking delivery of possession of property purchased in a court auction? CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Execution of
