Adarsh Kumar Goel

Supreme Court Upholds Selection Board’s Decision in Army Promotion Case: Union of India vs. Col Ran Singh Dudee (2018) INSC 567 (3 July 2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Selection Board’s Decision in Army Promotion Case Date of the Judgment: 3 July 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 567 Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J., Uday Umesh Lalit, J. Can “consequential benefits” following the quashing of a General Court Martial include automatic promotion to a higher rank? The Supreme Court of India addressed this […]

Supreme Court Upholds Selection Board’s Decision in Army Promotion Case: Union of India vs. Col Ran Singh Dudee (2018) INSC 567 (3 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Disciplinary Inquiry: Union of India vs. Ram Lakhan Sharma (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Disciplinary Inquiry: Union of India vs. Ram Lakhan Sharma (2018) Date of the Judgment: 02 July 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 605 Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. (authored the judgment) Can a disciplinary inquiry be deemed fair if the Inquiry Officer also acts as the prosecutor?

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Disciplinary Inquiry: Union of India vs. Ram Lakhan Sharma (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Dearness Relief for Bank Retirees Based on Retirement Date: United Bank of India vs. United Bank of India Retirees’ Welfare Association (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Dearness Relief for Bank Retirees Based on Retirement Date LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a distinction in dearness relief can be made between pre and post-November 2002 retirees. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Pension. Case Name: United Bank of India and others vs. United Bank of India Retirees’ Welfare Association and others. [Judgment Date]: May

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Dearness Relief for Bank Retirees Based on Retirement Date: United Bank of India vs. United Bank of India Retirees’ Welfare Association (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Bank Retiree Benefits: R. Balakrishna Bhat vs. Bank of Baroda (2018)

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Bank Retiree Benefits: R. Balakrishna Bhat vs. Bank of Baroda (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of uniform pension regulations to bank retirees. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: R. Balakrishna Bhat & Ors. vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors. [Judgment Date]: May 16, 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 16,

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Bank Retiree Benefits: R. Balakrishna Bhat vs. Bank of Baroda (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs CBI to complete investigation within two months in Jat Agitation Case: Dilawar vs. State of Haryana (2018)

Supreme Court Sets Timeline for CBI Investigation in Jat Agitation Case: Dilawar vs. State of Haryana (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether there should be timelines for completing investigation, especially when the accused is in custody. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Dilawar vs. State of Haryana. [Judgment Date]: May 1, 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May

Supreme Court directs CBI to complete investigation within two months in Jat Agitation Case: Dilawar vs. State of Haryana (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeals in Corruption Cases: Naveen Kaushik vs. CBI (26 April 2018)

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeals in Corruption Cases: Naveen Kaushik vs. CBI (2018) Date of the Judgment: 26 April 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. and Rohinton Fali Nariman, J. Can parties withdraw their appeals in criminal cases without prejudice to their contentions before the trial court? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeals in Corruption Cases: Naveen Kaushik vs. CBI (26 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Framing of Charges in Corruption Case, Directs Trial Court to Proceed: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (25 April 2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Framing of Charges in Corruption Case, Directs Trial Court to Proceed Date of the Judgment: 25 April 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. and Rohinton Fali Nariman, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed an appeal against the framing of charges in a corruption case. The core issue was

Supreme Court Upholds Framing of Charges in Corruption Case, Directs Trial Court to Proceed: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (25 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Exceptions in Banking Dispute: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty (2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Exceptions in Banking Dispute: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior judgment upholding a contract that violates statutory prohibitions operates as res judicata in subsequent proceedings. CASE TYPE: Banking Law, Contract Law, Civil Procedure. Case Name: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty & Anr. [Judgment

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Exceptions in Banking Dispute: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Timely Disposal of Arbitration Cases under M.P. Act, 1983

Supreme Court Directs Timely Disposal of Arbitration Cases under M.P. Act, 1983 LEGAL ISSUE: Ensuring timely disposal of arbitration proceedings under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s Essel Infra Projects Ltd. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [Judgment Date]: April 19, 2018 Date of the Judgment: April 19, 2018

Supreme Court Directs Timely Disposal of Arbitration Cases under M.P. Act, 1983 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “ascertained money” and arbitrator appointment in Madhya Pradesh arbitration: Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. vs. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation (2018)

Supreme Court clarifies “ascertained money” and arbitrator appointment in Madhya Pradesh arbitration: Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. vs. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation (2018) Date of the Judgment: April 18, 2018 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 4017 of 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) NO. 6513 OF 2018) Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J., Rohinton Fali Nariman, J. Can

Supreme Court clarifies “ascertained money” and arbitrator appointment in Madhya Pradesh arbitration: Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. vs. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds NCMEI’s Power to Declare Minority Status of Existing Educational Institutions: Sisters of St. Joseph of Cluny vs. State of West Bengal (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds NCMEI’s Power to Declare Minority Status of Existing Educational Institutions: Sisters of St. Joseph of Cluny vs. State of West Bengal (2018) Date of the Judgment: April 18, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 327 Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J., R.F. Nariman, J. (authored the judgment) Can an educational institution, initially established as a

Supreme Court Upholds NCMEI’s Power to Declare Minority Status of Existing Educational Institutions: Sisters of St. Joseph of Cluny vs. State of West Bengal (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Criminal Cases: Harita Sunil Parab vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2018)

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Criminal Cases: Harita Sunil Parab vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether criminal cases should be transferred from one jurisdiction to another based on the petitioner’s convenience. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Harita Sunil Parab vs. State of NCT of Delhi and Others Judgment Date: March 28,

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Criminal Cases: Harita Sunil Parab vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top