Ajay Rastogi

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Atrocities Case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Judges, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(1)(r), Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(1)(s)

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Atrocities Case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the sentence imposed under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was excessive given the circumstances of the case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Atrocities Act Case Name: Vetrivel vs. State Represented by its Deputy Superintendent of Police […]

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Atrocities Case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Atrocities Case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022) INSC 722

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Judges, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(1)(r), Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(1)(s)

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Atrocities Case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022) INSC 722 LEGAL ISSUE: Reduction of sentence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, based on the facts and circumstances of the case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: Vetrivel vs. State Represented by its Deputy Superintendent of Police

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Atrocities Case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022) INSC 722 Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Assault Case: Ram Kumar & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 148, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 325, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Sentencing

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Assault Case: Ram Kumar & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Disparity in sentencing among co-accused in a criminal case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Assault Case Name: Ram Kumar & Anr. vs. State of Haryana [Judgment Date]: 19 January 2022 Date of the Judgment: 19 January 2022

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Assault Case: Ram Kumar & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in reducing the additional compensation awarded by the Reference Court in a land acquisition case. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Ambalal Babulal Patel ETC. ETC. vs. The Group General Manager, ONGC

Supreme Court Restores Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case: Ambalal Babulal Patel vs. ONGC (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces sentence in Atrocities case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code with Section 323, Judges, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(1)(r), Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with Section 3(1)(s)

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Atrocities Case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Reduction of sentence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Vetrivel vs. State Represented by its Deputy Superintendent of Police & Anr. Judgment Date: 19 January 2022 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court reduces sentence in Atrocities case: Vetrivel vs. State (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rules on Child Custody in International Disputes: Vasudha Sethi vs. Kiran V. Bhaskar (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Fundamental Rights, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 13, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 6, Judges

Supreme Court Rules on Child Custody in International Disputes: Vasudha Sethi vs. Kiran V. Bhaskar (2022) Date of the Judgment: 12 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 40 Judges: Hon’ble Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ajay Rastogi Can a parent’s right to autonomy outweigh the child’s best interests in an international custody battle? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rules on Child Custody in International Disputes: Vasudha Sethi vs. Kiran V. Bhaskar (2022) Read Post »

Child Custody in International Disputes: Supreme Court Rules in Vasudha Sethi vs. Kiran V. Bhaskar (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Fundamental Rights, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 13(1), Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 6, Judges

Supreme Court Rules on Child Custody in International Disputes: Vasudha Sethi vs. Kiran V. Bhaskar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: International child custody dispute and the principle of “best interest of the child”. CASE TYPE: Habeas Corpus, Family Law Case Name: Vasudha Sethi & Ors. vs. Kiran V. Bhaskar & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 12 January 2022 Date

Child Custody in International Disputes: Supreme Court Rules in Vasudha Sethi vs. Kiran V. Bhaskar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights of Bank Employees, Dismissing Retroactive Rule Change: Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. vs. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies and Others (2022) INSC 14

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 7A, Judges, Pension, Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Land Mortgage Banks Service (Common Cadre) Rules, 1978, Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Land Mortgage Banks Service (Common Cadre) Rules, 1978 with Rule 15, Retrospective Amendment, Service Law, Vested Rights

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights of Bank Employees, Dismissing Retroactive Rule Change Date of the Judgment: 11 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 14 Judges: Hon’ble Justices Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka Can a cooperative bank retroactively withdraw a pension scheme, thereby denying its retired employees their entitled benefits? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights of Bank Employees, Dismissing Retroactive Rule Change: Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. vs. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies and Others (2022) INSC 14 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Regarding Teacher Recruitment: Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Review Petition, Service Law, Supreme Court Judgments, Teacher Recruitment, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Regarding Teacher Recruitment: Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Citation: Not Available in the document Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a review petition be entertained if it does not present any new substantial arguments?

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Regarding Teacher Recruitment: Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Civil Law, Judges, Judicial Review, Review Petition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a previous order of the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Civil Review Petition. Case Name: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Hon’ble Allahabad High Court. [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022. Introduction Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022.

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Review Jurisdiction, Review Jurisdiction Principles, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 40 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a review petition be entertained if it does not point out any error apparent on the record?

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court dismisses review petition due to delay in filing: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Limitation, Review Jurisdiction, Review Petition, Supreme Court Procedure, Uday Umesh Lalit

Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit J., Ajay Rastogi J. Can a review petition be entertained if there is an inordinate delay in filing the special leave petition? The Supreme Court addressed this issue in a recent case where a review petition was dismissed due to a significant delay in

Supreme Court dismisses review petition due to delay in filing: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top