Ajay Rastogi

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights of Retired Cooperative Bank Employees: Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. vs. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies and Others (2022) INSC 29

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952, Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952 with Section 17(1C), Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Pension, Service Law, Vested Rights

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights of Retired Cooperative Bank Employees Date of the Judgment: 11 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 29 Judges: Hon’ble Justices Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka Can a cooperative bank unilaterally withdraw a pension scheme that its retired employees had been contributing to and benefiting from for decades? The Supreme Court […]

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights of Retired Cooperative Bank Employees: Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. vs. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies and Others (2022) INSC 29 Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Review Petition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a previous order of the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Civil Review Petition Case Name: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Hon’ble Allahabad High Court Through Its Registrar General [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition on Allahabad High Court Order: Abhinitam Upadhyay vs. Allahabad High Court (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Due to Delay: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Civil Law, Delay, Judges, Limitation Act, Review Petition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Due to Delay: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a review petition can be entertained despite an unexplained and substantial delay. CASE TYPE: Civil Review Petition Case Name: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana and Another [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Due to Delay: Surender Mohan vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Regarding Teacher Selection: Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Review Petition, Judges, Review Petition, Service Law, Teacher Selection, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Regarding Teacher Selection: Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the selection process for teachers should be concluded based on an earlier notification, despite a subsequent decision allowing for a fresh selection process. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Sunil Kumar Yadav and Others

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Regarding Teacher Selection: Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Arbitration Petition Due to Appellant’s Inaction: Durga Welding Works vs. Chief Engineer, Railway Electrification (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Arbitration Petition Due to Appellant’s Inaction: Durga Welding Works vs. Chief Engineer, Railway Electrification (2022) Date of the Judgment: 04 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Abhay S. Oka. The judgment was authored by Justice Ajay Rastogi. Can a party, after filing an arbitration

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Arbitration Petition Due to Appellant’s Inaction: Durga Welding Works vs. Chief Engineer, Railway Electrification (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court dismisses contempt petition for non-payment of funds in Kamakhya Temple case (15 December 2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 129, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 with Section 12, Discretionary Jurisdiction, Judges

Supreme Court dismisses contempt petition for non-payment of funds in Kamakhya Temple case (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contempt action can be initiated for non-payment of funds when there is no specific direction for payment in the original judgment. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court Case Name: The Bordeurai Samaj of Sri Sri Maa Kamakhya v.

Supreme Court dismisses contempt petition for non-payment of funds in Kamakhya Temple case (15 December 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Case: K.S.R.T.C. vs. Bharathi M.R. (2021)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Compensation, High Court, Judges, Motor Accident Law, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Case: K.S.R.T.C. vs. Bharathi M.R. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in enhancing the compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in a motor accident case. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: The Managing Director K.S.R.T.C. vs. Bharathi M.R. and Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Case: K.S.R.T.C. vs. Bharathi M.R. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Kerala: Soman vs. Inland Waterways Authority (2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 23, Land Valuation, Property Law

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Kerala: Soman vs. Inland Waterways Authority (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Soman v. Inland Waterways Authority of India & Anr. Judgment Date: 10 December 2021 Date of the Judgment: 10 December

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation in Kerala: Soman vs. Inland Waterways Authority (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies seniority of ad-hoc and regular LDCs: Shyam Sunder Oberoi vs. District and Session Judge (2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ad-hoc Employees, Ajay Rastogi, Civil Procedure, Interim Order, Judges, Regularization, Seniority, Service Law, Writ Petition

Supreme Court clarifies seniority of ad-hoc and regular LDCs: Shyam Sunder Oberoi vs. District and Session Judge (2021) Date of the Judgment: December 8, 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 744 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Abhay S. Oka. The judgment was authored by Justice Rastogi. Can ad-hoc employees who are regularized later claim seniority from

Supreme Court clarifies seniority of ad-hoc and regular LDCs: Shyam Sunder Oberoi vs. District and Session Judge (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Sandeep vs. State of Haryana (2021)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Conviction, Criminal Law, Judges, Murder, Review Petition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Sandeep vs. State of Haryana (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a criminal conviction in a murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Sandeep vs. State of Haryana [Judgment Date]: December 08, 2021 Date of the Judgment: December 08, 2021 Citation: (Not Available in Source) Judges: Uday Umesh

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Sandeep vs. State of Haryana (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused After 9.5 Years of Incarceration: Ashim Kumar vs. National Investigation Agency (2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 21, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 121, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 122, Judges, National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 with Section 11, National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 with Section 19, National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 with Section 22, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 with Section 18, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 with Section 20, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 with Section 40

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused After 9.5 Years of Incarceration: Ashim Kumar vs. National Investigation Agency (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an accused can be granted bail considering the long period of incarceration as an undertrial, despite the stringent provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Ashim @ Asim

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused After 9.5 Years of Incarceration: Ashim Kumar vs. National Investigation Agency (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Brutal Assault Case: Vinod Kumar vs. Amritpal & Ors. (2021) INSC 742

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Criminal Law, Culpable Homicide, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 300, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Murder, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Brutal Assault Case: Vinod Kumar vs. Amritpal & Ors. (2021) INSC 742 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the offense of murder under Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is established when injuries are inflicted on vital body parts, even if there was no explicit intention to cause death. CASE

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Brutal Assault Case: Vinod Kumar vs. Amritpal & Ors. (2021) INSC 742 Read Post »

Scroll to Top