Ajay Rastogi

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Disparity Between Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (22 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Central Administrative Tribunal, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Judges, Pay Scales, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Disparity Between Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (2023) Date of the Judgment: 22 February 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 8329 of 2011 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi Can the judiciary interfere […]

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Disparity Between Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (22 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Pay Scales for Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (22 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Judges, Pay Scales, Service Law, Service Law with Fifth Central Pay Commission

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Pay Scales for Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the courts can interfere with the pay scales fixed by expert bodies like the Pay Commission. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association and Anr. Judgment Date: 22 February

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Pay Scales for Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (22 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, B.R. Gavai, Bela M. Trivedi, Compassionate Appointment, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 18(3), Labour Law with Section 2(p), M.R. Shah, Pankaj Mithal, R. Banumathi, Sandeep Mehta, Service Law, T.S. Thakur

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 February 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M. Trivedi When a person dies while in service, can their dependent automatically get a job? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash & Anr. (20 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Compassionate Appointment, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 18(3), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(p), Judges, Service Law

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash & Anr. (20 February 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dependent is entitled to compassionate appointment despite the presence of another earning family member. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Compassionate Appointment Case Name: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. & Others vs.

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash & Anr. (20 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Based on Last Seen Theory in Murder Case: Ram Gopal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 106, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Based on Last Seen Theory in Murder Case Date of the Judgment: 17 February 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 129 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi Can a conviction for murder be upheld when the case rests primarily on circumstantial evidence and the “last seen

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Based on Last Seen Theory in Murder Case: Ram Gopal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction: Suresh vs. State of Kerala (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Criminal Procedure, Evidence, First Information Statement, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 449, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction: Suresh vs. State of Kerala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused’s actions constitute murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, or culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I of the same code. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Suresh vs. State of Kerala Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction: Suresh vs. State of Kerala (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, C.T. Ravikumar, Claim Assessment, Consumer Law, Insurance Claims, Insurance Law, Insurance Law with Clause 6(b), Insurance Policy, Judges, Repudiation of Claims

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance claim can be repudiated for non-submission of documents when the surveyor has already assessed the loss. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law. Case Name: Karnavati Veneers Pvt. Ltd. vs. New India Assurance Company Limited and Others. [Judgment Date]: 9th February

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Breach of Policy Condition, C.T. Ravikumar, Consumer Law, Insurance Claims, Insurance Law, Insurance Law with Clause 6(b), Judges, Standard Fire & Special Perils Policy

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance company can repudiate a claim based on non-submission of documents when a surveyor has already assessed the loss. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law/Insurance Law Case Name: Karnavati Veneers Pvt. Ltd. vs. New India Assurance Company Limited and Others [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Adultery Ruling’s Impact on Armed Forces: Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2023)

/ Air Force Act, 1950, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Armed Forces Law, Army Act, 1950, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 33, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 497, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Navy Act, 1957

Supreme Court Clarifies Adultery Ruling’s Impact on Armed Forces: Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the applicability of the Joseph Shine judgment regarding adultery to the Armed Forces. CASE TYPE: Criminal (Constitutional Law) Case Name: Joseph Shine v. Union of India [Judgment Date]: 31 January 2023 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Clarifies Adultery Ruling’s Impact on Armed Forces: Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Civil Dispute: Usha Chakraborty vs. State of West Bengal (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 156(3), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Judges

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Civil Dispute: Usha Chakraborty vs. State of West Bengal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal case can be initiated when the core dispute is civil in nature. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Usha Chakraborty & Anr. vs. State of West Bengal & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 30 January 2023 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Civil Dispute: Usha Chakraborty vs. State of West Bengal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Civil Dispute: Usha Chakraborty vs. State of West Bengal (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 156(3), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Judges, Offences Against Property

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Civil Dispute: Usha Chakraborty vs. State of West Bengal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether criminal proceedings can be initiated when the core dispute is civil in nature and a civil suit is already pending. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Usha Chakraborty & Anr. vs. State of West Bengal & Anr.

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Civil Dispute: Usha Chakraborty vs. State of West Bengal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case: Naim Ahamed vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (30 January 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Consent, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 375, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 90, Judges, Rape

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case: Naim Ahamed vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2023) Date of the Judgment: 30 January 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 75 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M. Trivedi Can a long-term consensual relationship be considered rape if a promise of marriage is not fulfilled? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case: Naim Ahamed vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (30 January 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top