Aniruddha Bose

Supreme Court Intervention in Tender Process: Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation vs. Star Agriwarehousing and Collateral Management Limited & Ors. (2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 136, Contract Law, Hemant Gupta, Interim Orders, Judges, Public Interest, Public Law, Public Procurement, Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Rules, 2013, Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Rules, 2013 with Rule 70(8), State Revenue, Tender Process

Supreme Court Intervention in Tender Process: Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation vs. Star Agriwarehousing and Collateral Management Limited & Ors. (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the permissibility of interim orders that halt the execution of contracts following a completed tender process, especially when such orders impact public interest and state revenue. CASE […]

Supreme Court Intervention in Tender Process: Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation vs. Star Agriwarehousing and Collateral Management Limited & Ors. (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Sangita Arya vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Compensation Calculation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Motor Accident Claims, Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 with Section 166, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Sangita Arya vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation in motor accident claims, specifically concerning the assessment of income and the application of appropriate multipliers and future prospects. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Smt. Sangita Arya & Ors. vs. Oriental

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Sangita Arya vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Arbitration Award: Patel Engineering Ltd. vs. NEEPCO (22 May 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Patent Illegality, R. Banumathi, Setting Aside Arbitral Awards

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Arbitration Award: Patel Engineering Ltd. vs. NEEPCO (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in setting aside an arbitral award based on the interpretation of contract clauses and the application of the “patent illegality” principle under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as amended

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Arbitration Award: Patel Engineering Ltd. vs. NEEPCO (22 May 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the applicability of the SARFAESI Act to Cooperative Banks in Banking Law (2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arun Mishra, Banking Law, Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with Section 5, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Entry 32 of List II, Constitutional Law with Entry 45 of List I, Distribution of Legislative Powers, Indira Banerjee, Judges, M.R. Shah, Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Settles Applicability of SARFAESI Act to Cooperative Banks (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) applies to cooperative banks. CASE TYPE: Banking Law Case Name: Pandurang Ganpati Chaugule v. Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank Limited Judgment Date: May 05, 2020

Supreme Court settles the applicability of the SARFAESI Act to Cooperative Banks in Banking Law (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles classification of car mats: Textile Floor Coverings vs. Vehicle Accessories (2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Excise Law, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with Section 57, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with Section 87, Classification of Goods, Deepak Gupta, Judges, Textile Floor Coverings, Vehicle Parts and Accessories

Supreme Court Classifies Car Mats Under Textile Floor Coverings, Not Vehicle Accessories LEGAL ISSUE: Whether car mats should be classified as “textile floor coverings” or as “parts and accessories” of motor vehicles. CASE TYPE: Central Excise Law Case Name: Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III vs. M/S. Uni Products India Ltd. Judgment Date: May 1, 2020

Supreme Court settles classification of car mats: Textile Floor Coverings vs. Vehicle Accessories (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land holding limits under Karnataka Land Reforms Act for plantations: State of Karnataka vs. Y. Moideen Kunhi (27 April 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Deepak Gupta, Judges, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 with Section 104, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 with Section 66, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 with Section 79B

Karnataka Land Reforms Act: Supreme Court clarifies land holding limits for plantations Date of the Judgment: 27 April 2020 Citation: State of Karnataka vs. Y. Moideen Kunhi (2020) INSC 340 Judges: Deepak Gupta, J., Aniruddha Bose, J. Can land primarily used for plantation be subjected to the same land holding restrictions as other agricultural land

Supreme Court clarifies land holding limits under Karnataka Land Reforms Act for plantations: State of Karnataka vs. Y. Moideen Kunhi (27 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies valuation of imported goods under Customs Act: Commissioner of Customs vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. (27 April 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Customs Law, Customs Law with Rule 9, Customs Law with Section 14, Deepak Gupta, Judges, Valuation of Imported Goods

Supreme Court clarifies valuation of imported goods under Customs Act: Commissioner of Customs vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the value of post-importation services, such as design and engineering fees, should be included in the assessable value of imported goods for the purpose of customs duty. CASE TYPE: Customs Law, Valuation

Supreme Court clarifies valuation of imported goods under Customs Act: Commissioner of Customs vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. (27 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Inter-State Sales Tax: No Time Limit on Delivery for Section 6(2) Benefit in Commercial Taxes Officer vs. Bombay Machinery Store (27 April 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 with Section 3, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 with Section 6, Deepak Gupta, Judges, Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 with Section 51

Supreme Court on Inter-State Sales Tax and Delivery Timeframes: Commercial Taxes Officer vs. Bombay Machinery Store (2020) Date of the Judgment: 27 April 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 347 Judges: Deepak Gupta, J., Aniruddha Bose, J. Can tax authorities impose a time limit on the delivery of goods for availing tax exemptions on inter-state sales? The

Supreme Court clarifies Inter-State Sales Tax: No Time Limit on Delivery for Section 6(2) Benefit in Commercial Taxes Officer vs. Bombay Machinery Store (27 April 2020) Read Post »

Matrimonial Home Rights: Supreme Court Directs Accommodation in Redeveloped Property in Aishwarya Atul Pusalkar vs. Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (27 April 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Deepak Gupta, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 with Section 18, Judges, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 with Section 177, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 with Section 2(25), Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 with Section 95-A, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 with Section 19, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 with Section 2(s), Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 with Section 3(iv)

Supreme Court Directs Accommodation for Wife in Matrimonial Dispute: Aishwarya Atul Pusalkar vs. Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a wife can enforce her right to reside in her matrimonial home through a writ petition, especially when the original home was part of a redevelopment project under the Maharashtra Housing and

Matrimonial Home Rights: Supreme Court Directs Accommodation in Redeveloped Property in Aishwarya Atul Pusalkar vs. Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (27 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Assault Case: Dhanpal vs. State NCT of Delhi (27 April 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Deepak Gupta, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Assault Case: Dhanpal vs. State NCT of Delhi (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused shared a common intention to commit murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Dhanpal vs. State NCT of Delhi Judgment Date: 27 April

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Assault Case: Dhanpal vs. State NCT of Delhi (27 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles dispute on electricity disconnection and minimum guarantee charges: Bihar State Electricity Board vs. M/S Iceberg Industries Ltd. (27 April 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Consumer Grievance Redressal, Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Consumer Law, Consumer Rights, Deepak Gupta, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 2(15), Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 56, Judges

Supreme Court settles dispute on electricity disconnection and minimum guarantee charges: Bihar State Electricity Board vs. M/S Iceberg Industries Ltd. (2020) Date of the Judgment: 27 April 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 348 Judges: Deepak Gupta, J., Aniruddha Bose, J. Can an electricity board disconnect power supply to a consumer for non-payment of dues, even if

Supreme Court settles dispute on electricity disconnection and minimum guarantee charges: Bihar State Electricity Board vs. M/S Iceberg Industries Ltd. (27 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Authority to Set Sugarcane Prices Above Central Minimum: West U.P. Sugar Mills Association vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (22 April 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arun Mishra, Concurrent List, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 246, Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Essential Commodities Act, 1955 with Section 3(2)(c), Indira Banerjee, Judges, M.R. Shah, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies State Power to Fix Sugarcane Prices Above Central Minimum Date of the Judgment: 22 April 2020 Judges: Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, M.R. Shah, Aniruddha Bose Can a state government fix sugarcane prices that are higher than the minimum price set by the central government? This was the core legal question

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Authority to Set Sugarcane Prices Above Central Minimum: West U.P. Sugar Mills Association vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (22 April 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top