Aniruddha Bose

Supreme Court Refuses Special Stray Round for NEET-PG 2021 Vacant Seats: Dr. Astha Goel & Ors. vs. Medical Counselling Committee & Ors. (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Counseling, Education, Education Law, Judges, M.R. Shah, Medical, Medical Admissions, NEET-PG, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Refuses Special Stray Round for NEET-PG 2021 Vacant Seats LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a special stray round of counseling should be conducted to fill vacant NEET-PG seats after the conclusion of scheduled rounds. CASE TYPE: Education Law, specifically relating to medical admissions. Case Name: Dr. Astha Goel and Ors. vs. The Medical Counselling Committee […]

Supreme Court Refuses Special Stray Round for NEET-PG 2021 Vacant Seats: Dr. Astha Goel & Ors. vs. Medical Counselling Committee & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court favors Paternal Grandparents in Child Custody Battle: Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya vs. State of Gujarat (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Child Custody, Family Law, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 7, Judges, M.R. Shah, Welfare of the Child

Supreme Court favors Paternal Grandparents in Child Custody Battle: Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya vs. State of Gujarat (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the appropriate custodian for a minor child who has lost both parents. CASE TYPE: Child Custody/Habeas Corpus Case Name: Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. [Judgment Date]: June 09, 2022 Date of

Supreme Court favors Paternal Grandparents in Child Custody Battle: Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya vs. State of Gujarat (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MCOCA Sanction in Kidnapping Case: Abhishek vs. State of Maharashtra (20 May 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Continuing Unlawful Activity, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 363, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 364A, Judges, Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 with Section 23, Offences Against Human Body, Organised Crime

Supreme Court Upholds MCOCA Sanction in Kidnapping Case: Abhishek vs. State of Maharashtra (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of sanction for prosecution under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Abhishek vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Judgment Date: 20 May 2022 Date of the Judgment: 20 May

Supreme Court Upholds MCOCA Sanction in Kidnapping Case: Abhishek vs. State of Maharashtra (20 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Halts Railway Expansion in Western Ghats: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, B.R. Gavai, Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Law, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Precautionary Principle, Sustainable Development, Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 with Section 38(O)

Supreme Court Halts Railway Expansion in Western Ghats: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Balancing development with environmental protection in ecologically sensitive zones. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, Public Interest Litigation. Case Name: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: May 09, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Halts Railway Expansion in Western Ghats: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court halts railway expansion in Western Ghats to protect ecology: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India (09 May 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, B.R. Gavai, Environmental Law, Environmental Law with Section 38(O), Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Precautionary Principle, Sustainable Development, Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 with Section 38(O)

Supreme Court revokes railway line expansion in Western Ghats: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Balancing development with environmental protection in ecologically sensitive areas. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, Public Interest Litigation. Case Name: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 09 May 2022 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court halts railway expansion in Western Ghats to protect ecology: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India (09 May 2022) Read Post »

Furlough Rights for Life Imprisonment: Supreme Court Allows Furlough for Prisoner Despite No Remission: Atbir vs. State of NCT of Delhi (29 April 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 72, Delhi Prison Act, 2000, Delhi Prison Act, 2000 with Section 2(h), Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Furlough Rights for Life Imprisonment Without Remission LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prisoner sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole or remission is eligible for furlough under the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Atbir vs. State of NCT of Delhi Judgment Date: 29 April 2022 Date of

Furlough Rights for Life Imprisonment: Supreme Court Allows Furlough for Prisoner Despite No Remission: Atbir vs. State of NCT of Delhi (29 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies remission process for life convicts: Ram Chander vs. State of Chhattisgarh (22 April 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 432, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 433A, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court clarifies remission process for life convicts: Ram Chander vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the opinion of the presiding judge is binding on the government when considering the premature release of a life convict. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Ram Chander vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & Anr. Judgment Date: 22

Supreme Court clarifies remission process for life convicts: Ram Chander vs. State of Chhattisgarh (22 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Employee’s Date of Birth in VRS Dispute: Shankar Lal vs Hindustan Copper Ltd (20 April 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Judges, Mines Act, 1952, Mines Act, 1952 with Form B, Service Law, Voluntary Retirement Scheme

Supreme Court Upholds Employee’s Date of Birth in VRS Dispute: Shankar Lal vs Hindustan Copper Ltd (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the correct date of birth for an employee’s retirement benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Shankar Lal vs Hindustan Copper Ltd. & Ors. Judgment Date: 20 April 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Upholds Employee’s Date of Birth in VRS Dispute: Shankar Lal vs Hindustan Copper Ltd (20 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Automaker Liable for Defective Airbags in Consumer Case: Hyundai Motor India Ltd. vs. Shailendra Bhatnagar (20 April 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 14, Consumer Rights, Implied Conditions, Judges, Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 with Section 16, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Holds Automaker Liable for Defective Airbags in Hyundai Motor India Ltd. vs. Shailendra Bhatnagar (2022) Date of the Judgment: 20 April 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 3001 of 2022 (Arising out of Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 4881 of 2021) Judges: Justice Vineet Saran and Justice Aniruddha Bose Can a

Supreme Court Holds Automaker Liable for Defective Airbags in Consumer Case: Hyundai Motor India Ltd. vs. Shailendra Bhatnagar (20 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Eligibility for Higher Judicial Service Exam: All India Judges Association vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 233, Judges, Judicial Appointments, Judicial Promotions, L. Nageswara Rao, Limited Departmental Competitive Examination, Service Law

Supreme Court Modifies Eligibility for Higher Judicial Service Exam: All India Judges Association vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of eligibility criteria for promotion to the Delhi Higher Judicial Service (DHJS) through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE). CASE TYPE: Service Law, specifically concerning judicial appointments and promotions. Case Name: All India Judges Association

Supreme Court Modifies Eligibility for Higher Judicial Service Exam: All India Judges Association vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies CIRP Costs and Workmen’s Dues in Insolvency: Sunil Kumar Jain vs. Sundaresh Bhatt (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 326, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 327, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 36(4), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 5(13), Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies CIRP Costs and Workmen’s Dues in Insolvency: Sunil Kumar Jain vs. Sundaresh Bhatt (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of what constitutes “Insolvency Resolution Process Costs” (CIRP costs) and the priority of workmen’s dues during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Sunil Kumar Jain and others vs. Sundaresh

Supreme Court Clarifies CIRP Costs and Workmen’s Dues in Insolvency: Sunil Kumar Jain vs. Sundaresh Bhatt (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies insider trading norms: Family relations alone not proof of guilt in securities fraud cases (19 April 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Connected Person, Insider, Judges, SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015, SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 with Regulation 3(1), Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 with Section 12A, Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 with Section 15G, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court on Insider Trading: Family Ties Not Enough for Guilt (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether family relationships and circumstantial evidence are sufficient to prove insider trading. CASE TYPE: Securities Law, Insider Trading Case Name: Balram Garg vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India Judgment Date: 19 April 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19 April

Supreme Court clarifies insider trading norms: Family relations alone not proof of guilt in securities fraud cases (19 April 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top