Arijit Pasayat

Supreme Court clarifies interest on delayed excise refunds: Union of India vs. Shreeji Colour Chem Industries (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 15, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. When does the government have to pay interest on delayed refunds of excise duties? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving Shreeji Colour Chem Industries. The core issue was whether the company was […]

Supreme Court clarifies interest on delayed excise refunds: Union of India vs. Shreeji Colour Chem Industries (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Juvenile Justice Act in murder case: Ranjit Singh vs. State of Haryana (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 1458 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.349 of 2008) Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. When does the Juvenile Justice Act apply in cases of serious crimes like murder? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in Ranjit Singh

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Juvenile Justice Act in murder case: Ranjit Singh vs. State of Haryana (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits father and brother in alleged throttling case: Inspector of Police vs. Muthusamy (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Citation: [Not Available from Source] Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Did the High Court err in acquitting the accused based on unreliable evidence and discrepancies in the prosecution’s case? The Supreme Court addressed this question in an appeal against a judgment by the Madras

Supreme Court acquits father and brother in alleged throttling case: Inspector of Police vs. Muthusamy (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the effect of repeal on Exclusive Marketing Rights under the Patents Act: Glaxo Smith Kline PLC vs. Controller of Patents & Designs (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Citation: N/A (Case reference: Civil Appeal No. 5588 of 2008, arising out of SLP (C) No.21010 of 2006) Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. When a law is repealed, what happens to the rights that were in the process of being decided under

Supreme Court settles the effect of repeal on Exclusive Marketing Rights under the Patents Act: Glaxo Smith Kline PLC vs. Controller of Patents & Designs (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of appellate court powers in acquittal appeals: State of U.P. vs. Awdhesh (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 9, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can an appellate court overturn an acquittal? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of State of U.P. v. Awdhesh, concerning the scope of powers vested in appellate courts when reviewing

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of appellate court powers in acquittal appeals: State of U.P. vs. Awdhesh (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision on Discharge of Bond for Medical Disability: Union of India vs. Priyankan Sharan (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 8, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5539 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 25514 of 2004) Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. and S.H. Kapadia, J. Can a medical cadet, who executed a bond to serve the nation after completing their MBBS, be discharged from the bond due

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision on Discharge of Bond for Medical Disability: Union of India vs. Priyankan Sharan (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Parity in Service Benefits between Army Personnel and GREF Officers: Ramesh Singh vs. Union of India (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 11, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J., Aftab Alam, J. Should employees of the Border Roads Organisation (BRO) receive the same service benefits as members of the Armed Forces? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in Ramesh Singh v. Union of India, a case

Supreme Court Denies Parity in Service Benefits between Army Personnel and GREF Officers: Ramesh Singh vs. Union of India (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Consideration of Will in Property Dispute: N. Srihari (D) vs. N. Prakash (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19th February 2008 Case Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat & P. Sathasivam In a dispute over property rights, can a will that is referenced in court documents but not formally presented as evidence be considered? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Consideration of Will in Property Dispute: N. Srihari (D) vs. N. Prakash (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles age limit rules for direct recruitment in civil posts: Union of India vs. Shri Ramesh Singh Rajput (2007)

Date of the Judgment: December 14, 2007 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can the government deny appointment to a selected candidate based on a discrepancy in their date of birth records? The Supreme Court addressed this issue in a case where a candidate’s school certificate and affidavit showed different dates of birth,

Supreme Court settles age limit rules for direct recruitment in civil posts: Union of India vs. Shri Ramesh Singh Rajput (2007) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order regarding correction of date of birth in service records: State of Gujarat & Ors. vs. Vali Mohmed Dosabhai Sindhi (2006)

Date of the Judgment: 19th July 2006 Citation: [Not provided in the document] Judges: Arijit Pasayat and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ. Can a government employee change their date of birth in their service record late in their career? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in an appeal from the Gujarat High Court. The

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order regarding correction of date of birth in service records: State of Gujarat & Ors. vs. Vali Mohmed Dosabhai Sindhi (2006) Read Post »

Supreme Court mandates compulsory marriage registration across India: Seema vs. Ashwani Kumar (2006)

Date of the Judgment: 14th February 2006 Citation: Transfer Petition (civil) 291 of 2005 Judges: Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice S.H. Kapadia In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India addressed the pressing issue of unregistered marriages and their impact on women and children. The Court recognized that the absence of official marriage records

Supreme Court mandates compulsory marriage registration across India: Seema vs. Ashwani Kumar (2006) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Culpable Homicide Case: Shriram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

When does a fight become a crime? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of Shriram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, focusing on the line between self-defense and unlawful aggression. This case involves an incident where a group returning from a religious gathering was attacked, leading to serious injuries and a

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Culpable Homicide Case: Shriram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Read Post »

Scroll to Top