Arun Mishra

Impleading Legal Representatives: Supreme Court Clarifies Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applicability in Cases of Pre-Suit Death (2017)

Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 879 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can a suit against a dead person be rectified by adding their legal heirs later? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this crucial question in a case concerning a property dispute where one of the […]

Impleading Legal Representatives: Supreme Court Clarifies Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applicability in Cases of Pre-Suit Death (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Sale of Trust Property: Cyrus Rustom Patel vs. Charity Commissioner (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Charity Commissioner properly sanctioned the sale of trust property under Section 36 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. CASE TYPE: Trust Law/Property Law Case Name: Cyrus Rustom Patel vs. The Charity Commissioner Maharashtra, State & Ors. Judgment Date: 21 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 21 September 2017 Citation: (2017)

Supreme Court Sets Aside Sale of Trust Property: Cyrus Rustom Patel vs. Charity Commissioner (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies definition of ‘wages’ under Employees State Insurance Act: Employees State Insurance Corporation vs. Mangalam Publications (21 September 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether interim relief paid to employees constitutes “wages” under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948. CASE TYPE: Employees’ State Insurance Law Case Name: Employees State Insurance Corporation & Anr. vs. Mangalam Publications (I) Private Limited [Judgment Date]: 21 September 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 21 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 811 Judges:

Supreme Court clarifies definition of ‘wages’ under Employees State Insurance Act: Employees State Insurance Corporation vs. Mangalam Publications (21 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Husband’s Right to Retiral Benefits, Rejecting Deathbed Will: Prakash Soni vs. Deepak Kumar (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a deathbed will, executed under suspicious circumstances, can supersede the rights of a legal heir to receive retiral benefits. CASE TYPE: Succession Law Case Name: Dr. Prakash Soni vs. Deepak Kumar and another Judgment Date: 15 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 15 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 784 Judges: Arun Mishra,

Supreme Court Upholds Husband’s Right to Retiral Benefits, Rejecting Deathbed Will: Prakash Soni vs. Deepak Kumar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the scope of ‘land’ under the Land Acquisition Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. (2017) INSC 794 (15 September 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 15 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 794 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can the government acquire a building or part of a building without acquiring the underlying land? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this complex issue in a case involving the State of Maharashtra and Reliance

Supreme Court settles the scope of ‘land’ under the Land Acquisition Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. (2017) INSC 794 (15 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Land Compensation: Manoj Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2017) INSC 744 (13 September 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 13 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 744 Judges: Arun Mishra, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Is it justifiable for a High Court to blindly follow a previous judgment when determining land compensation, or should each case be evaluated based on its own merits and evidence? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Reduces Land Compensation: Manoj Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2017) INSC 744 (13 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Land Possession Dispute: Rajnarayan Sharma vs. Sirnam Sharma (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of rightful possession of land in a property dispute. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Rajnarayan Sharma vs. Sirnam Sharma and Others Judgment Date: 12 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 12 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 756 Judges: Arun Mishra, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can mere entries in

Supreme Court Settles Land Possession Dispute: Rajnarayan Sharma vs. Sirnam Sharma (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Dowry Harassment Charges: Varala Bharath Kumar vs. State of Telangana (2017)

Date of the Judgment: September 05, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 793 Judges: Arun Mishra, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can a criminal case for dowry harassment and breach of trust be sustained if the allegations primarily concern marital discord and lack of intimacy? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a recent case, ultimately

Supreme Court Quashes Dowry Harassment Charges: Varala Bharath Kumar vs. State of Telangana (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Private Permits on Notified Route: U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs. Sandeep Kumar Jain (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether private operators can operate on a notified route under the Motor Vehicles Act. CASE TYPE: Transportation Law Case Name: U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs. Sandeep Kumar Jain & Ors. Judgment Date: 05 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 788 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., Mohan M.

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Private Permits on Notified Route: U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs. Sandeep Kumar Jain (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the jurisdiction of trial courts under the SEBI Act: Classic Credit Ltd. vs. SEBI (21 August 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct court for trying offenses under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (SEBI Act). CASE TYPE: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Securities and Exchange Board of India vs. Classic Credit Ltd. Introduction Date of the Judgment: 21 August 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 729 Judges: Jagdish Singh Khehar, CJI,

Supreme Court settles the jurisdiction of trial courts under the SEBI Act: Classic Credit Ltd. vs. SEBI (21 August 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns discharge in disproportionate assets case: State of Tamil Nadu vs. K.N. Nehru (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Can a High Court discharge an accused in a disproportionate assets case while ordering further investigation into the source of income of a related party? CASE TYPE: Criminal – Prevention of Corruption Act Case Name: State represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police vs. K.N. Nehru etc. Judgment Date: July 21, 2017 Introduction Date

Supreme Court overturns discharge in disproportionate assets case: State of Tamil Nadu vs. K.N. Nehru (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case due to lack of demand evidence: Mukhtiar Singh vs. State of Punjab (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether proof of demand for illegal gratification is essential for conviction under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Prevention of Corruption Act Case Name: Mukhtiar Singh (Since Deceased) Through His L.R. vs. State of Punjab Judgment Date: 14 July 2017 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case due to lack of demand evidence: Mukhtiar Singh vs. State of Punjab (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top