Ashok Bhushan

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Mercy Petition in Nirbhaya Case: Vinay Sharma vs. Union of India (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Mercy Petition in Nirbhaya Case: Vinay Sharma vs. Union of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Judicial review of the President’s decision on a mercy petition. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Vinay Sharma vs. Union of India and Others. Judgment Date: 14 February 2020 Date of the Judgment: 14 February 2020 […]

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Mercy Petition in Nirbhaya Case: Vinay Sharma vs. Union of India (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Presumption of Debt in Cheque Dishonor Cases: APS Forex Services vs. Shakti International (2020)

Supreme Court Settles Presumption of Debt in Cheque Dishonor Cases: APS Forex Services vs. Shakti International (2020) Date of the Judgment: 14 February 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 123 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., M. R. Shah, J. Can a person be convicted for cheque bounce if they claim the cheque was for security? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court settles Presumption of Debt in Cheque Dishonor Cases: APS Forex Services vs. Shakti International (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Freedom Fighter Pension: Government of India vs. Sitakant S. Dubhashi (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Freedom Fighter Pension: Government of India vs. Sitakant S. Dubhashi (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a cut-off date can be imposed for eligibility for pension under a scheme for freedom fighters. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal Case Name: Government of India & Ors. vs. Sitakant S. Dubhashi & Anr. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Freedom Fighter Pension: Government of India vs. Sitakant S. Dubhashi (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Alienate Property Despite Gift Deed Restriction: Sridhar vs. N. Revanna (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Alienate Property Despite Gift Deed Restriction: Sridhar vs. N. Revanna (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a condition in a gift deed restricting the donee’s right to alienate the property is valid under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Transfer Case Name: Sridhar & Anr. vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Alienate Property Despite Gift Deed Restriction: Sridhar vs. N. Revanna (2020) Read Post »

U.P. Avas Vikas Parishad Employee Service Conditions: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench (10 February 2020)

Supreme Court Refers U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Service Condition Dispute to Larger Bench Date of the Judgment: 10 February 2020 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J. and M.R. Shah, J. Can a state government control the service conditions of employees of a housing board? The Supreme Court of India has referred this crucial question to a

U.P. Avas Vikas Parishad Employee Service Conditions: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench (10 February 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Disallowance of MODVAT Credit as Deduction: Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Disallowance of MODVAT Credit as Deduction: Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether unutilized MODVAT credit can be claimed as a deduction under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Case Name: Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Disallowance of MODVAT Credit as Deduction: Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Registration Requirements for Compromise Decrees in Property Disputes: Mohammade Yusuf vs. Rajkumar (2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies Registration Requirements for Compromise Decrees in Property Disputes: Mohammade Yusuf vs. Rajkumar (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a compromise decree regarding property that is the subject matter of a suit requires registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Mohammade Yusuf & Ors. vs. Rajkumar

Supreme Court Clarifies Registration Requirements for Compromise Decrees in Property Disputes: Mohammade Yusuf vs. Rajkumar (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings against directors for alleged supply of substandard materials: Sushil Sethi vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh (2020) INSC 79 (31 January 2020)

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Substandard Material Supply Case Date of the Judgment: 31 January 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 79 Judges: Ashok Bhushan J., M.R. Shah J. Can directors of a company be held criminally liable for alleged substandard supplies made by their company, even when the company itself is not an

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings against directors for alleged supply of substandard materials: Sushil Sethi vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh (2020) INSC 79 (31 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Property Dispute: Govind Prasad Kejriwal vs. State of Bihar (2020)

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Property Dispute: Govind Prasad Kejriwal vs. State of Bihar (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal complaint arising from a civil dispute related to a partnership firm and property can be sustained. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Govind Prasad Kejriwal vs. State of Bihar & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 31 January

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Property Dispute: Govind Prasad Kejriwal vs. State of Bihar (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings arising from family dispute: Ahmad Ali Quraishi & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (30 January 2020)

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Family Dispute Case Date of the Judgment: 30 January 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 89 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J. and M.R. Shah, J. Can a criminal complaint be quashed if it appears to be a tool for settling personal scores rather than a genuine pursuit of justice? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings arising from family dispute: Ahmad Ali Quraishi & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (30 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right to Seek Fair Rent During Contractual Tenancy: N. Motilal & Ors. vs. Faisal Bin Ali & Anr. (2020) INSC 75

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right to Seek Fair Rent During Contractual Tenancy Date of the Judgment: January 30, 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 75 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a landlord seek an increase in rent even when a lease agreement is still in effect? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right to Seek Fair Rent During Contractual Tenancy: N. Motilal & Ors. vs. Faisal Bin Ali & Anr. (2020) INSC 75 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant Rights: Vaijinath Jadhav vs. Afsar Begum (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant Rights: Vaijinath Jadhav vs. Afsar Begum (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a second challenge to a statutory tenant certificate is maintainable after the first challenge by legal heirs failed. CASE TYPE: Land Tenancy Law Case Name: Vaijinath S/O Yeshwanta Jadhav Deceased By L.R. and Others vs. Afsar Begum, Wife of Nadimuddin, Deceased

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant Rights: Vaijinath Jadhav vs. Afsar Begum (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top