Ashok Bhushan

Supreme Court Upholds Recruitment Process for Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspectors: Vishal Ashok Thorat vs. Rajesh Shrirambapu Fate (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 309, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 213(4), Navin Sinha

Supreme Court Upholds Recruitment Process for Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspectors: Vishal Ashok Thorat vs. Rajesh Shrirambapu Fate (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with a select list of candidates when the challenge to the advertisement is not allowed. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Vishal Ashok Thorat & Ors. vs. Rajesh Shrirambapu […]

Supreme Court Upholds Recruitment Process for Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspectors: Vishal Ashok Thorat vs. Rajesh Shrirambapu Fate (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants unconditional leave to defend in summary suit: Sudin Dilip Talaulikar vs. Polycab Wires Pvt. Ltd. (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXXVII, Dishonour of Cheque, Judges, Leave to Defend, Navin Sinha, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Summary Suit

Supreme Court grants unconditional leave to defend in summary suit: Sudin Dilip Talaulikar vs. Polycab Wires Pvt. Ltd. (2019) Date of the Judgment: July 15, 2019 Citation: Civil Appeal No(s). 5528 of 2019 (arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 9368 of 2018) Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J. and Navin Sinha, J. Can a court impose conditions

Supreme Court grants unconditional leave to defend in summary suit: Sudin Dilip Talaulikar vs. Polycab Wires Pvt. Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Child’s Boarding School Admission in Custody Dispute: Sheoli Hati vs. Somnath Das (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Child Custody, Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 12, Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 7, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Navin Sinha

Supreme Court Upholds Child’s Boarding School Admission in Custody Dispute: Sheoli Hati vs. Somnath Das (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a child should be admitted to a boarding school amidst a custody dispute between parents. CASE TYPE: Family Law, Guardianship Case Name: Sheoli Hati vs. Somnath Das [Judgment Date]: July 11, 2019 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Upholds Child’s Boarding School Admission in Custody Dispute: Sheoli Hati vs. Somnath Das (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies back wages entitlement in unauthorized absence case: Chief Regional Manager vs. Siraj Uddin Khan (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Back Wages, Disciplinary Proceedings, General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1975, General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1975 with Rule 23(a), Judges, Navin Sinha, No Work No Pay, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies back wages entitlement in unauthorized absence case: Chief Regional Manager vs. Siraj Uddin Khan (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee is automatically entitled to back wages upon the setting aside of a termination order, especially when the employee was absent from duty. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Chief Regional Manager, United

Supreme Court clarifies back wages entitlement in unauthorized absence case: Chief Regional Manager vs. Siraj Uddin Khan (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Mining Regulations in Meghalaya Tribal Areas: State of Meghalaya vs. All Dimasa Students Union (2019) INSC 709 (03 July 2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 244(2), Constitutional Law with Article 275(1), Judges, K.M. Joseph, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 with Section 21, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 with Section 4, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 with Section 5, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 14, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 15, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 2(m), Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India

Supreme Court Clarifies Mining Regulations in Meghalaya Tribal Areas Date of the Judgment: 03 July 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 709 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., K.M. Joseph, J. Can tribal communities in Meghalaya mine coal on their land without a mining lease? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this crucial question, clarifying the applicability of

Supreme Court Clarifies Mining Regulations in Meghalaya Tribal Areas: State of Meghalaya vs. All Dimasa Students Union (2019) INSC 709 (03 July 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies bail and investigation powers in UAPA cases: Pradeep Ram vs. State of Jharkhand (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 167, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 309, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 414, Judges, K.M. Joseph, National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 with Section 6, National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 with Section 8

Supreme Court clarifies bail and investigation powers in UAPA cases: Pradeep Ram vs. State of Jharkhand (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on bail procedures and investigation powers when new offenses, particularly under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), are added after an initial bail grant. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Case Name: Pradeep

Supreme Court clarifies bail and investigation powers in UAPA cases: Pradeep Ram vs. State of Jharkhand (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies definition of ‘public place’ under Bihar Excise Act: Satvinder Singh vs State of Bihar (2019) INSC 594

/ Ashok Bhushan, Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 with Section 2(17A), Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 with Section 53(a), Bihar Excise Act, 1915, Bihar Excise Act, 1915 with Section 2(17), Criminal Procedure Code, Criminal Procedure Code with Section 482, Judges, K.M. Joseph

Supreme Court clarifies definition of ‘public place’ under Bihar Excise Act: Satvinder Singh vs State of Bihar (2019) INSC 594 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a private vehicle on a public road constitutes a ‘public place’ under the Bihar Excise Act. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Satvinder Singh @ Satvinder Singh Saluja & Ors. vs. The State

Supreme Court clarifies definition of ‘public place’ under Bihar Excise Act: Satvinder Singh vs State of Bihar (2019) INSC 594 Read Post »

Supreme Court Bars Second Suit on Same Cause of Action: Pramod Kumar vs. Zalak Singh (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 109, Order II Rule 2, Order VII Rule 1

Supreme Court Bars Second Suit on Same Cause of Action: Pramod Kumar vs. Zalak Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a second suit is maintainable when it arises from the same cause of action as a previously filed suit, but involves a different sale deed. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Pramod Kumar & Anr. vs. Zalak

Supreme Court Bars Second Suit on Same Cause of Action: Pramod Kumar vs. Zalak Singh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Transportation of Already Challaned Coal in Meghalaya: Lber Laloo vs. All Dimasa Students Union (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Environmental Law, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mining Law, National Green Tribunal, Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court Allows Transportation of Already Challaned Coal in Meghalaya LEGAL ISSUE: Whether transportation of already challaned coal should be permitted despite a ban on coal mining. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, Mining Law Case Name: Lber Laloo vs. All Dimasa Students Union & Ors. and Ka Hima Nongstoin Land Owners, Coal Traders and Producers Association

Supreme Court Allows Transportation of Already Challaned Coal in Meghalaya: Lber Laloo vs. All Dimasa Students Union (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in 1980 Murder Case: Shio Shankar Dubey vs. State of Bihar (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Evidence Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in 1980 Murder Case: Shio Shankar Dubey vs. State of Bihar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in upholding the conviction based on the testimony of related witnesses and inconsistencies in the inquest report. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Shio Shankar Dubey & Ors. vs. State of Bihar Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in 1980 Murder Case: Shio Shankar Dubey vs. State of Bihar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Non-User of Rented Premises: Nilesh Laxmichand vs. Shantaben Purushottam Kakad (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 with Section 2(32), Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 with Section 7(2)(A), Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 11, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 with Section 16(1)(c), Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 with Section 16(1)(n)

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Non-User of Rented Premises: Nilesh Laxmichand vs. Shantaben Purushottam Kakad (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant can be evicted for not using the rented premises for the purpose it was let out for a continuous period of six months. CASE TYPE: Civil (Rent Control) Case Name: Nilesh Laxmichand and

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Non-User of Rented Premises: Nilesh Laxmichand vs. Shantaben Purushottam Kakad (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules on Abatement of Appeals in Joint Property Disputes: Hemareddi vs. Ramachandra (2019)

/ Abatement of Appeals, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Adoption, Property Law, Ashok Bhushan, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXII Rule 3, Joint Property, Property Law, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Order XXII, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Property Law

Supreme Court on Abatement of Appeals in Joint Property Disputes: Hemareddi vs. Ramachandra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appeal filed jointly by two brothers abates entirely if one brother dies and his legal representatives are not brought on record, particularly in a dispute regarding joint family property and adoption. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Law) Case

Supreme Court rules on Abatement of Appeals in Joint Property Disputes: Hemareddi vs. Ramachandra (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top