Ashok Bhushan

Supreme Court Upholds Villa Possession, Rejects Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Sanjay Singh vs. Central Himalayan Land Development Co. Ltd. (21 February 2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 148, Condonation of Delay, Interim Orders, Judges, Property Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Villa Possession, Rejects Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Sanjay Singh vs. Central Himalayan Land Development Co. Ltd. (2019) Date of the Judgment: 21 February 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 166 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ashok Bhushan, J. Can a High Court reverse an order that was based on the understanding between […]

Supreme Court Upholds Villa Possession, Rejects Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Sanjay Singh vs. Central Himalayan Land Development Co. Ltd. (21 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to Reconsider Juvenile Status in Murder Case: Gaurav Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Juvenile Justice Act, Juvenile Justice Act with Rule 12(3), Juvenile Justice Act with Rule 22(5), K.M. Joseph, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court directs High Court to Reconsider Juvenile Status in Murder Case: Gaurav Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of Juvenile Status. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Gaurav Kumar @ Monu vs. The State of Haryana. [Judgment Date]: 15 February 2019. Date of the Judgment: 15 February 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC

Supreme Court directs High Court to Reconsider Juvenile Status in Murder Case: Gaurav Kumar vs. State of Haryana (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies powers of Delhi Government vs. Lieutenant Governor in Services and other matters (2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 2(s), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 24, Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 with Section 2(a), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 239, Constitutional Law with Article 239AA, Judges

Delhi’s Governance: Supreme Court Clarifies Powers in Services and More (2019) Date of the Judgment: February 14, 2019 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J. and Ashok Bhushan, J. Can the Delhi government control its own services, or does that power reside with the Lieutenant Governor? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question, among others, in a recent

Supreme Court clarifies powers of Delhi Government vs. Lieutenant Governor in Services and other matters (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Railways’ Promotion Policy, Rejects Delay Claim: Union of India vs. C. Girija (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Promotion, Right to Equality, Service Law, Service Law with Delay and Laches

Supreme Court Upholds Railways’ Promotion Policy, Rejects Delay Claim: Union of India vs. C. Girija (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a claim for promotion can be rejected due to significant delay and whether the reservation policy for promotions was correctly applied. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. C. Girija &

Supreme Court Upholds Railways’ Promotion Policy, Rejects Delay Claim: Union of India vs. C. Girija (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Deemed Purchase Rights under Bombay Tenancy Act: Bayaji Sambhu Mali vs. Nazir Mohammed Balal Zari (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 with Section 32, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 with Section 32F, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Landlord and Tenant

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Deemed Purchase Rights under Bombay Tenancy Act: Bayaji Sambhu Mali vs. Nazir Mohammed Balal Zari (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant is required to issue a notice under Section 32F(1A) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, when the tenant is already deemed to have purchased the land under

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Deemed Purchase Rights under Bombay Tenancy Act: Bayaji Sambhu Mali vs. Nazir Mohammed Balal Zari (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Unearned Increase on Leasehold Property Transfers: DDA vs. Karamdeep Finance (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Government Grants, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 269UD, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 269UE, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Leasehold Rights, Property Law, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 111

Supreme Court Upholds Unearned Increase on Leasehold Property Transfers: DDA vs. Karamdeep Finance (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an auction purchaser of a leasehold property is liable to pay unearned increase to the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). CASE TYPE: Property Law, specifically concerning leasehold rights and government auctions. Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. M/s. Karamdeep

Supreme Court Upholds Unearned Increase on Leasehold Property Transfers: DDA vs. Karamdeep Finance (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal in Property Disputes: Punjab Wakf Board vs. Sham Singh Harike & Teja Singh (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 10, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Wakf Act, 1995, Wakf Act, 1995 with Section 83, Wakf Act, 1995 with Section 85, Wakf Tribunal

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal in Property Disputes: Punjab Wakf Board vs. Sham Singh Harike & Teja Singh (2019) Date of the Judgment: 07 February 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 79 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J. and K.M. Joseph, J. Can a Wakf Tribunal decide on cases where the core issue is whether a property

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal in Property Disputes: Punjab Wakf Board vs. Sham Singh Harike & Teja Singh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Property Partition Suits: Shivnarayan vs. Maniklal (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 16, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 17, General Clauses Act, 1897, General Clauses Act, 1897 with Section 13, Judges, Jurisdiction, K.M. Joseph

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Property Partition Suits: Shivnarayan vs. Maniklal (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for partition of immovable properties situated in different jurisdictions can be combined into a single suit. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Partition). Case Name: Shivnarayan (D) By Lrs. vs. Maniklal (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: February 6,

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Property Partition Suits: Shivnarayan vs. Maniklal (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds No Re-evaluation Rule in Tripura Judicial Service Exam: High Court of Tripura vs. Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XVII Rule 1, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Re-evaluation, Recruitment, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds No Re-evaluation Rule in Tripura Judicial Service Exam: High Court of Tripura vs. Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can order re-evaluation of answer sheets when the rules governing the examination do not provide for it. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: High Court of Tripura Through The

Supreme Court Upholds No Re-evaluation Rule in Tripura Judicial Service Exam: High Court of Tripura vs. Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Revenue Records: Dharam Singh vs. Prem Singh (2019)

/ Asami Rights, Ashok Bhushan, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Kumaon and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960, Kumaon and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 with Section 10, Land Dispute, Land Law, Revenue Records, U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 with Chapter IV

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Revenue Records: Dharam Singh vs. Prem Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an individual can claim ownership of land based on entries in revenue records, even if a competent authority has ordered the deletion of their name from those records. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Dispute Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Revenue Records: Dharam Singh vs. Prem Singh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the power of Additional District Magistrate under Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 in externment cases (29 January 2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Criminal Law, Criminal Law with Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Externment, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990, Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 with Section 18, Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 with Section 3

Supreme Court Upholds Additional District Magistrate’s Power Under Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 Date of the Judgment: 29 January 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 74 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., K.M. Joseph, J. Can an Additional District Magistrate issue an externment order under the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court settles the power of Additional District Magistrate under Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 in externment cases (29 January 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies rent revision under Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001: Harbans Kaur vs. Iqbal Singh (29 January 2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 with Section 4, Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 with Section 6, Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 with Section 9

Supreme Court clarifies rent revision under Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001: Harbans Kaur vs. Iqbal Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of rent revision clauses under the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, specifically concerning the rights of landlords and tenants regarding rent increases. CASE TYPE: Landlord-Tenant Dispute, Rent Control Case Name: Harbans Kaur vs. Iqbal Singh

Supreme Court clarifies rent revision under Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001: Harbans Kaur vs. Iqbal Singh (29 January 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top