Ashok Bhushan

Supreme Court Temporarily Reinstates Ban on Firework Sales in Delhi NCR for Diwali 2017

/ A.K. Sikri, Abhay Manohar Sapre, Air Pollution, Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 48A, Constitutional Law with Article 51A(g), Environmental Law, Environmental Protection, Fundamental Duties, Judges

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court should reimpose a ban on the sale of fireworks in Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) for Diwali 2017, considering the severe air pollution caused by fireworks. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law Case Name: Arjun Gopal and Others vs. Union of India and Others Judgment Date: 9th October 2017 […]

Supreme Court Temporarily Reinstates Ban on Firework Sales in Delhi NCR for Diwali 2017 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Limitation on Hire Purchase Breach: Sundaram Finance vs. Noorjahan Beevi (2016)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Ashok Bhushan, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Hire Purchase Agreement, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 113, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 55

LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the limitation period for filing a suit for recovery of dues in a hire-purchase agreement breach. CASE TYPE: Civil (Hire Purchase Agreement) Case Name: M/S. Sundaram Finance Limited vs. Noorjahan Beevi and Another [Judgment Date]: 29th June 2016 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 29th June 2016 Citation: (2016) INSC 657 Judges: Justice

Supreme Court Upholds Limitation on Hire Purchase Breach: Sundaram Finance vs. Noorjahan Beevi (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Auction of Metallurgical Coke: LMJ International Ltd. vs. Dankuni Steels Limited (2017)

/ A.K. Sikri, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 9, Ashok Bhushan, Auction Law, Court-Ordered Auctions, Fair Market Value, Judges, Reserve Price

Can a court accept a bid in an auction if the offered price, after deducting taxes, falls below the reserve price? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case concerning the sale of metallurgical coke. This case highlights the importance of ensuring fair value in court-ordered auctions. The judgment was delivered

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Auction of Metallurgical Coke: LMJ International Ltd. vs. Dankuni Steels Limited (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Anti-Dumping Duty Extension Rules: Union of India vs. Kumho Petrochemicals (2017)

/ A.K. Sikri, Anti-Dumping Duty, Ashok Bhushan, Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Customs Tariff Act, 1975 with Section 9A, Customs Tariff Act, 1975 with Section 9A(5), General Clauses Act, 1897, General Clauses Act, 1897 with Section 24, Judges

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the extension of anti-dumping duty can be done after the expiry of the original notification period and whether the initiation of sunset review is valid if the notification is made public after the expiry of the original notification. CASE TYPE: Anti-Dumping Law Case Name: Union of India and Another vs. M/s. Kumho

Supreme Court Clarifies Anti-Dumping Duty Extension Rules: Union of India vs. Kumho Petrochemicals (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top