B.N. Agrawal

Supreme Court clarifies conditions for stay on eviction orders during appeals: State of Maharashtra vs. M/s. Super Max International Pvt. Ltd. (27 August 2009)

/ Aftab Alam, B.N. Agrawal, Bombay Rent Act, 1947, Bombay Rent Act, 1947 with Section 13(1)(g), Bombay Rent Act, 1947 with Section 13(3)(a), Eviction Orders, G.S. Singhvi, Judges

Date of the Judgment: 27 August 2009 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: B.N. Agrawal, G.S. Singhvi, Aftab Alam Can a High Court impose conditions, such as requiring a tenant to pay an amount exceeding the contractual rent, for staying an eviction order during the pendency […]

Supreme Court clarifies conditions for stay on eviction orders during appeals: State of Maharashtra vs. M/s. Super Max International Pvt. Ltd. (27 August 2009) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Allotment of Housing Board House After Unjustified Exclusion: Umesh Pandey vs. Bihar State Housing Board (2009)

/ Administrative Law, B.N. Agrawal, Fairness, G.S. Singhvi, Judges, Natural Justice

Can a housing board deny allotment of a house based on a minor defect in an affidavit without giving an opportunity to rectify it? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case where an applicant was excluded from a housing lottery due to an alleged defect in the submitted affidavit. The Court

Supreme Court Orders Allotment of Housing Board House After Unjustified Exclusion: Umesh Pandey vs. Bihar State Housing Board (2009) Read Post »

Fake Driving License and Insurance Claims: Supreme Court Clarifies Liability in Consumer Cases (September 18, 2008)

/ B.N. Agrawal, Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Consumer Protection Law, G.S. Singhvi, Insurance Law, Judges, Own Damage Claims, Third-Party Claims

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 18, 2008 Judges: B.N. Agrawal, J. and G.S. Singhvi, J. When is an insurance company liable to pay a claim if the driver of the insured vehicle has a fake driving license? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in a series of civil appeals, focusing on cases where

Fake Driving License and Insurance Claims: Supreme Court Clarifies Liability in Consumer Cases (September 18, 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction: State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Santosh Kumar (2008)

/ B.N. Agrawal, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Writ Petition, G.S. Singhvi, Judges

Date of the Judgment: September 15, 2008 Judges: Justice B.N. Agrawal, Justice G.S. Singhvi Introduction When can a High Court refuse to hear a case? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case where the High Court of Punjab and Haryana made observations on a case it should not have heard in

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction: State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Santosh Kumar (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Divorce Petition: Harmit Kaur vs. Jarnail Singh (2008)

/ B.N. Agrawal, G.S. Singhvi, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13, Judges

Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Justice B.N. Agrawal and Justice G.S. Singhvi Can a divorce petition be transferred to a different district for the convenience of the parties involved? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Divorce Petition: Harmit Kaur vs. Jarnail Singh (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside orders in U.T. Chandigarh v. Manjit Singh (2008)

/ B.N. Agrawal, G.S. Singhvi, Judges

Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Judges: Justices B.N. Agrawal and G.S. Singhvi In a brief order, the Supreme Court addressed appeals arising from a dispute involving U.T. Chandigarh and Manjit Singh. The central issue revolved around the validity of certain orders that were contested by both parties. The Supreme Court, after hearing arguments,

Supreme Court sets aside orders in U.T. Chandigarh v. Manjit Singh (2008) Read Post »

Uphar Tragedy Bail Cancellation: Supreme Court Orders Surrender in Criminal Appeal (2008)

/ B.N. Agrawal, Delhi Cinematograph Act, 1952, Delhi Cinematograph Act, 1952 with Section 14, G.S. Singhvi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304-A, Judges, Offences Affecting Life

Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Citation: [Citation not available in the provided text] Judges: Justice B.N. Agrawal, Justice G.S. Singhvi Can individuals convicted of serious offenses, even if bailable, be denied bail based on their conduct after the initial grant of bail? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the

Uphar Tragedy Bail Cancellation: Supreme Court Orders Surrender in Criminal Appeal (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Assault Case: Claudio Fernandes vs. State of Goa (2008)

/ B.N. Agrawal, Criminal Appeal, Criminal Law, Harjit Singh Bedi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Judges, Sentence Reduction, Sentencing, Supreme Court Judgments

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 09, 2008 Judges: B.N. Agrawal and Harjit Singh Bedi, JJ. In cases involving allegations of assault, the length of imprisonment can vary significantly based on the specific facts and circumstances. The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Claudio Fernandes vs. State of Goa, addressed the issue of

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Assault Case: Claudio Fernandes vs. State of Goa (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court alters conviction in a murder case based on individual roles: Kaparapu Apparao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2008)

/ B.N. Agrawal, Harjit Singh Bedi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 324, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges

Date of the Judgment: September 09, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: B.N. Agrawal, J. and Harjit Singh Bedi, J. In a case of multiple accused convicted for murder, can the nature of individual participation alter the conviction? The Supreme Court addressed this question in Kaparapu Apparao & Ors. vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,

Supreme Court alters conviction in a murder case based on individual roles: Kaparapu Apparao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case based on weak circumstantial evidence: Nur Islam Khan vs. State of West Bengal (2008)

/ B.N. Agrawal, Harjit Singh Bedi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges

Date of the Judgment: September 09, 2008 Judges: B.N. Agrawal and Harjit Singh Bedi, JJ. Can a conviction for murder be sustained solely on the basis of circumstantial evidence, specifically when the accused was last seen with the deceased? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a criminal appeal, ultimately acquitting the

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case based on weak circumstantial evidence: Nur Islam Khan vs. State of West Bengal (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Sentences in Attempt to Murder Case: Virsa Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab (09 September 2008)

/ Attempt to Murder, B.N. Agrawal, Criminal Law, Harjit Singh Bedi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 326, Judges, Unlawful Assembly

Date of the Judgment: 09 September 2008 Citation: N/A Judges: Justice B.N. Agrawal, Justice Harjit Singh Bedi In a criminal appeal concerning a case of attempted murder, the Supreme Court of India addressed the matter of sentencing. The central issue revolved around whether the High Court was justified in upholding the convictions and sentences imposed

Supreme Court Reduces Sentences in Attempt to Murder Case: Virsa Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab (09 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside eviction decree, recognizing firm as statutory tenant: Gautham Bhavan vs. Sakuntala Sahu (2008)

/ B.N. Agrawal, Eviction, G.S. Singhvi, Judges, Property Law, Statutory Tenant, Tenancy

Date of the Judgment: September 05, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5516 of 2008 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 5500 of 2008) Judges: B.N. Agrawal, J. and G.S. Singhvi, J. Can a court disregard prior judgments establishing tenancy rights in an eviction suit? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a

Supreme Court sets aside eviction decree, recognizing firm as statutory tenant: Gautham Bhavan vs. Sakuntala Sahu (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top