B.N. Srikrishna

Gokarna Temple Administration: Supreme Court Orders Interim Committee in Ramachandrapura Math vs. Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, B.N. Srikrishna, Judges, Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997, Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 with Section 1(4), Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 with Section 20-A, Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 with Section 23, S. A. Bobde, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Intervenes in Gokarna Temple Dispute: Ramachandrapura Math vs. Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Dispute over the administration and ownership of the Gokarna Mahabaleshwara Temple. CASE TYPE: Religious and Charitable Endowments Law Case Name: Ramachandrapura Math vs. Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru & Ors. Judgment Date: April 19, 2021 Introduction Date of the […]

Gokarna Temple Administration: Supreme Court Orders Interim Committee in Ramachandrapura Math vs. Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Addresses Slum Redevelopment Delays: Susme Builders vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority (2018)

/ B.N. Srikrishna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Deepak Gupta, Judges, Madan B. Lokur, Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 with Section 13(2), Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 with Section 3A, Slum Rehabilitation Authority

Supreme Court Addresses Slum Redevelopment Delays: Susme Builders vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Slum Rehabilitation Authority can remove a developer for project delays and lack of 70% slum dweller consent. CASE TYPE: Slum Redevelopment Law Case Name: Susme Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court Addresses Slum Redevelopment Delays: Susme Builders vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles classification of electric fans under Central Excise Act: Khaitan Electrical Ltd. vs. Collector of Central Excise (06 August 2003)

/ B.N. Srikrishna, Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Tariff Item No. 33, Classification of Goods, Excise Duty, G.P. Mathur, Judges, S. Rajendra Babu

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 06 August 2003 Citation: 2003 Supp(2) SCR 268 Judges: S. Rajendra Babu, B.N. Srikrishna, G.P. Mathur Are ‘multi-purpose’ electric fans, capable of being used as both table and cabin fans, to be classified based on their primary design and intended use? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in

Supreme Court settles classification of electric fans under Central Excise Act: Khaitan Electrical Ltd. vs. Collector of Central Excise (06 August 2003) Read Post »

Scroll to Top