B.R. Gavai

Supreme Court Upholds State Commission’s Authority in Power Purchase Agreements: Southern Power Distribution Company Limited vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Limited (2022)

/ Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 with Section 21, B.R. Gavai, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 62, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86(1)(b), Judges, L. Nageswara Rao

Supreme Court Upholds State Commission’s Authority in Power Purchase Agreements: Southern Power Distribution Company Limited vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Limited (2022) Date of the Judgment: February 2, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 101 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and B.R. Gavai, J. Can a power distribution company withdraw from a power purchase agreement (PPA) after […]

Supreme Court Upholds State Commission’s Authority in Power Purchase Agreements: Southern Power Distribution Company Limited vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Power Purchase Agreement: Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Ltd. (2 February 2022)

/ Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 with Section 21, B.R. Gavai, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86(1)(b), Judges, L. Nageswara Rao

Supreme Court Upholds Power Purchase Agreement: Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Distribution Company can withdraw from a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) after initially agreeing to it and after the power plant has become operational. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Contract Law, Regulatory Law. Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Power Purchase Agreement: Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Ltd. (2 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Manipur Parliamentary Secretary Act, but Strikes Down Saving Clause

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 194, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Legislative Competence

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Manipur Parliamentary Secretary Act, but Strikes Down Saving Clause LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Manipur State Legislature had the competence to enact the Manipur Parliamentary Secretary (Appointment, Salary and Allowances and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2012 and subsequently repeal it with a saving clause. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law Case Name: The State

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Manipur Parliamentary Secretary Act, but Strikes Down Saving Clause Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Manipur’s Repeal of Parliamentary Secretary Act, Limits Saving Clause: State of Manipur vs. Surjakumar Okram (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 164, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Legislative Competence

Supreme Court Upholds Manipur’s Repeal of Parliamentary Secretary Act, Limits Saving Clause: State of Manipur vs. Surjakumar Okram (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Manipur Legislature had the competence to enact a saving clause in the Repealing Act of the Manipur Parliamentary Secretary Act, 2012, after the Assam Act of 2004, which is in pari materia,

Supreme Court Upholds Manipur’s Repeal of Parliamentary Secretary Act, Limits Saving Clause: State of Manipur vs. Surjakumar Okram (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Manipur Act but Strikes Down Saving Clause: State of Manipur vs. Surjakumar Okram (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 246, Fundamental Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Legislative Competence, Legislative Competence with List II Entry 39, Legislative Competence with List II Entry 40, State Legislature Powers

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Manipur Act but Strikes Down Saving Clause: State of Manipur vs. Surjakumar Okram (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Legislative competence of a state legislature to enact laws regarding parliamentary secretaries and the validity of saving clauses in repealing acts. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law/Legislative Competence Case Name: State of Manipur & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Manipur Act but Strikes Down Saving Clause: State of Manipur vs. Surjakumar Okram (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Corrects Cause Title in Service Matter Appeal: Praveen Kumar vs. Kerala PSC (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Civil Procedure, Correction of Judgement, Judges, Kerala Public Service Commission, L. Nageswara Rao, Miscellaneous Application, Service Law

Supreme Court Corrects Cause Title in Service Matter Appeal: Praveen Kumar vs. Kerala PSC (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 28, 2022 Citation: Miscellaneous Application No.1769/2021 in C.A. No.4846/2021 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai. Did you know that even a small error in a court document can

Supreme Court Corrects Cause Title in Service Matter Appeal: Praveen Kumar vs. Kerala PSC (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Collection for SC/ST Promotion Reservations: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 335, Fundamental Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Collection for SC/ST Promotion Reservations: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 28, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 78 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J., B.R. Gavai, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed a series of appeals concerning the contentious issue of reservations in

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Collection for SC/ST Promotion Reservations: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Requirements for Reservation in Promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 335, Fundamental Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Requirements for Reservation in Promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: What constitutes adequate quantifiable data for providing reservations in promotions for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Jarnail Singh & Ors. vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 28 January

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Requirements for Reservation in Promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies data collection for reservation in promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Fundamental Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Reservation in Promotions, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Service Law with Cadre

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Collection for Reservation in Promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the method of collecting quantifiable data for reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). CASE TYPE: Service Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: Jarnail Singh & Ors. vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta &

Supreme Court clarifies data collection for reservation in promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition of Joint Family Property: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Civil Procedure, Civil Procedure with Order 7 Rule 11, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(1)(e), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 49, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition of Joint Family Property: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for partition is maintainable when a prior partition of joint family property has been established. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Partition Case Name: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy and Anr. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition of Joint Family Property: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(1)(e), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(2)(v), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 49, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior family partition, even if based on an unregistered arbitration award, bars a subsequent suit for partition of the same properties. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy and

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(r), Consumer Rights, Contract Law, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36A, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36B, Unconscionable Contracts, Unfair Trade Practices

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1106 of 2009 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a real estate developer be held liable

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top