B.R. Gavai

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Fainul Khan vs. State of Jharkhand (4 October 2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Fainul Khan vs. State of Jharkhand (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in upholding the conviction of the Appellants under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Fainul Khan vs. State of Jharkhand Judgment […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case: Fainul Khan vs. State of Jharkhand (4 October 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Institutional Preference in Post Graduate Medical Admissions Despite NEET (4 October 2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Institutional Preference in Post Graduate Medical Admissions Despite NEET Date of the Judgment: 4 October 2019 Citation: Yatinkumar Jasubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2019) INSC 1179 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., M.R. Shah, J., B.R. Gavai, J. Can a medical college give preference to its own graduates for post-graduate admissions, even after

Supreme Court Upholds Institutional Preference in Post Graduate Medical Admissions Despite NEET (4 October 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Admission Standards for PwD Candidates: Vidhi Himmat Katariya vs. State of Gujarat (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Admission Standards for PwD Candidates: Vidhi Himmat Katariya vs. State of Gujarat (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether revised eligibility criteria for Persons with Disabilities (PwD) for MBBS admissions can be applied mid-selection process. CASE TYPE: Education/Disability Law Case Name: Vidhi Himmat Katariya and others vs. The State of Gujarat and others [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Admission Standards for PwD Candidates: Vidhi Himmat Katariya vs. State of Gujarat (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revisits Atrocities Act Guidelines: Union of India vs. State of Maharashtra (2019)

Supreme Court Revisits Atrocities Act Guidelines: Union of India vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of guidelines regarding arrests under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: Union of India vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 01 October 2019

Supreme Court Revisits Atrocities Act Guidelines: Union of India vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Invalidates Sale Agreement Due to Statutory Bar: Narayanamma vs. Govindappa (2019)

Supreme Court Invalidates Sale Agreement Due to Statutory Bar: Narayanamma vs. Govindappa (2019) Date of the Judgment: September 26, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1003 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., M. R. Shah, J., B.R. Gavai, J. Can a sale agreement made during a statutory prohibition period be enforced after the prohibition ends? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Invalidates Sale Agreement Due to Statutory Bar: Narayanamma vs. Govindappa (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Excise Duty Exemption on Tobacco Products: Union of India vs. Unicorn Industries (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Excise Duty Exemption on Tobacco Products: Union of India vs. Unicorn Industries (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Union of India can withdraw an excise duty exemption on certain products, invoking public interest, despite having granted the exemption earlier. CASE TYPE: Excise Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Excise Duty Exemption on Tobacco Products: Union of India vs. Unicorn Industries (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Authority in Municipal Land Disposal: Municipal Council Neemuch vs. Mahadeo Real Estate (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Authority in Municipal Land Disposal: Municipal Council Neemuch vs. Mahadeo Real Estate (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: The extent of the State Government’s power to oversee and approve the disposal of municipal property, specifically regarding the requirement for prior sanction for land transfers exceeding a certain value and the process for ensuring competitive

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Authority in Municipal Land Disposal: Municipal Council Neemuch vs. Mahadeo Real Estate (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pension benefits for Acting Chief Justices: K. Sreedhar Rao vs. Union of India (2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Benefits for Acting Chief Justices: K. Sreedhar Rao vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an Acting Chief Justice of a High Court is entitled to the same pensionary benefits as a Chief Justice. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Pension Case Name: K. Sreedhar Rao vs. Union of India [Judgment Date]: September

Supreme Court clarifies pension benefits for Acting Chief Justices: K. Sreedhar Rao vs. Union of India (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top