B V Nagarathna

Supreme Court Clarifies Cognizance of Offences under MMDR Act and IPC in Mining Cases: Pradeep S. Wodeyar vs. State of Karnataka (29 November 2021)

Supreme Court Clarifies Cognizance of Offences under MMDR Act and IPC in Mining Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Special Court under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act) can take cognizance of offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and whether a Magistrate’s committal is necessary for the Special Court to […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Cognizance of Offences under MMDR Act and IPC in Mining Cases: Pradeep S. Wodeyar vs. State of Karnataka (29 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Disinvestment of Residual Stake in Hindustan Zinc Limited, Orders CBI Probe (18 November 2021)

Supreme Court Allows Disinvestment of Residual Stake in Hindustan Zinc Limited, Orders CBI Probe LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Union Government can disinvest its residual shareholding in Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) without amending the Metal Corporation (Nationalisation and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976, and whether a CBI enquiry is warranted into the disinvestment of 26% of HZL’s

Supreme Court Allows Disinvestment of Residual Stake in Hindustan Zinc Limited, Orders CBI Probe (18 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes detention under National Security Act due to delay in representation consideration: Sarabjeet Singh Mokha vs. District Magistrate (2021) INSC 735 (29 October 2021)

Supreme Court quashes detention under National Security Act due to delay in representation consideration: Sarabjeet Singh Mokha vs. District Magistrate (2021) INSC 735 (29 October 2021) Date of the Judgment: 29 October 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 735 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J, Vikram Nath, J, B V Nagarathna, J. The judgment was authored by

Supreme Court quashes detention under National Security Act due to delay in representation consideration: Sarabjeet Singh Mokha vs. District Magistrate (2021) INSC 735 (29 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns quashing of abetment to suicide case: Mahendra K C vs. State of Karnataka (29 October 2021)

Supreme Court overturns quashing of abetment to suicide case: Mahendra K C vs. State of Karnataka (2021) Date of the Judgment: 29 October 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 749 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and B V Nagarathna, J. Can a High Court quash a criminal case of abetment to suicide based on its own

Supreme Court overturns quashing of abetment to suicide case: Mahendra K C vs. State of Karnataka (29 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Corrects Typographical Errors in Magadh Sugar and Energy Ltd. Judgment (20 October 2021)

Supreme Court Corrects Typographical Errors in Magadh Sugar and Energy Ltd. Judgment (20 October 2021) Date of the Judgment: 20 October 2021 Citation: Miscellaneous Application No 1608 of 2021 in Civil Appeal No 5728 of 2021 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and B V Nagarathna, J Did the Supreme Court make a mistake in

Supreme Court Corrects Typographical Errors in Magadh Sugar and Energy Ltd. Judgment (20 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in Murder Case: Prashant Singh Rajput vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021)

Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in Murder Case: Prashant Singh Rajput vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court correctly granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a murder case, considering the seriousness of the crime and specific allegations against them. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Prashant Singh Rajput vs. The

Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in Murder Case: Prashant Singh Rajput vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory in Corruption Cases: CBI vs. Vijayalakshmi (2021)

Supreme Court Clarifies Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory in Corruption Cases: CBI vs. Vijayalakshmi (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Preliminary Inquiry is mandatory before registering an FIR in corruption cases involving public servants. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Prevention of Corruption Case Name: Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Anr. vs. Thommandru Hannah Vijayalakshmi @ T.H. Vijayalakshmi

Supreme Court Clarifies Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory in Corruption Cases: CBI vs. Vijayalakshmi (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Modification Plea in Supertech Demolition Case: Supertech Limited vs. Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association (2021)

Supreme Court Rejects Modification Plea in Supertech Demolition Case (2021) Date of the Judgment: 4 October 2021 Citation: Miscellaneous Application No 1572 of 2021 in Civil Appeal No 5041 of 2021 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and B V Nagarathna, J. Can a developer circumvent a Supreme Court order for demolition by proposing a

Supreme Court Rejects Modification Plea in Supertech Demolition Case: Supertech Limited vs. Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association (2021) Read Post »

Stamp Duty Refund: Supreme Court rules in favor of homebuyer in Rajeev Nohwar vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (24 September 2021)

Supreme Court Allows Stamp Duty Refund Despite Delay: Rajeev Nohwar vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a refund of stamp duty can be denied due to a delay in application when the delay was caused by pending litigation and the stamp paper was not used. CASE TYPE: Revenue Law, Stamp Duty Refund

Stamp Duty Refund: Supreme Court rules in favor of homebuyer in Rajeev Nohwar vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (24 September 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top