B.V. Nagarathna

Supreme Court enhances compensation for grievous brain injuries in motor accident claim: Sri. Benson George vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2022) INSC 170 (25 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Compensation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Judges, Loss of Amenities, M.R. Shah, Motor Vehicle Accident Law, Pain and Suffering

Supreme Court enhances compensation for grievous brain injuries in motor accident claim Date of the Judgment: 25 February 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 170 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can the compensation awarded for pain and suffering and loss of amenities be considered adequate when a claimant suffers grievous brain injuries in a […]

Supreme Court enhances compensation for grievous brain injuries in motor accident claim: Sri. Benson George vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2022) INSC 170 (25 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Blacklisting Period for Contractor in Odisha Flyover Collapse Case: State of Odisha vs. M/s Panda Infraproject Limited (2022)

/ Administrative Law, Administrative Law with Show Cause Notice, B.V. Nagarathna, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Contract Law with Blacklisting, Judges, M.R. Shah, Natural Justice

Supreme Court Limits Blacklisting Period for Contractor in Odisha Flyover Collapse Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractor can be permanently blacklisted for lapses in construction leading to a fatal accident. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Public Works Case Name: State of Odisha & Ors. vs. M/s Panda Infraproject Limited [Judgment Date]: 24 February 2022 Date of

Supreme Court Limits Blacklisting Period for Contractor in Odisha Flyover Collapse Case: State of Odisha vs. M/s Panda Infraproject Limited (2022) Read Post »

Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property: Supreme Court Upholds Tax Liability of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (23 February 2022)

/ Agricultural Produce Market Committees, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 with Section 9, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1963 with Rule 45, Renting of Immovable Property, Service Tax

Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property by Agricultural Produce Market Committees: Supreme Court Judgment Date of the Judgment: 23 February 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs) be exempted from service tax on renting out immovable property? The Supreme Court of India

Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property: Supreme Court Upholds Tax Liability of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Agricultural Market Committees Liable for Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property: Supreme Court Judgment (23 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Exemption Notifications, Judges, M.R. Shah, Powers and Duties of Market Committees, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 with Section 9, Service Tax Law, Service Tax Law with Finance Act, 1994

Agricultural Market Committees Liable for Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property: Supreme Court Judgment (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Agricultural Produce Market Committees are liable to pay service tax on renting immovable property. CASE TYPE: Service Tax Case Name: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, New Mandi Yard, Alwar vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Alwar

Agricultural Market Committees Liable for Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property: Supreme Court Judgment (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Transfer of Land Grabbing Cases (23 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Judges, Jurisdiction of Courts, M.R. Shah, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Transfer of Land Grabbing Cases (23 February 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can transfer cases from Special Courts to jurisdictional courts in a disposed of matter on a special mentioning. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. The

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Transfer of Land Grabbing Cases (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Land Grabbing Cases Transfer (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Inherent Powers of High Court, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Land Grabbing Cases Transfer (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can transfer cases from Special Courts to jurisdictional courts in a disposed matter. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. The State, represented by the Inspector of Police, Central

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Land Grabbing Cases Transfer (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Service Tax on Renting by Agricultural Produce Market Committees: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti vs. Commissioner (23 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Exemption Notifications, Judges, M.R. Shah, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, Renting of Immovable Property, Section 9, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, Service Tax Law, Statutory Obligations

Service Tax on Renting by Agricultural Market Committees: Supreme Court Decision LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Agricultural Produce Market Committees are liable to pay service tax on renting of immovable property. CASE TYPE: Service Tax Law Case Name: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, New Mandi Yard, Alwar vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Alwar Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds Service Tax on Renting by Agricultural Produce Market Committees: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti vs. Commissioner (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Land Grabbing Cases Transfer: Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. The State (2022) INSC 157 (23 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Inherent Powers of the High Court, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Land Grabbing Cases Transfer LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can transfer cases from Special Courts to jurisdictional courts in a disposed matter based on a special mentioning. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeals Case Name: Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. The State, represented by

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Land Grabbing Cases Transfer: Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. The State (2022) INSC 157 (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Liability of Financiers in Possession of Vehicles: Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. vs. State of U.P. (22 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah, Motor Vehicle Taxation, Motor Vehicle Taxation with Section 4, Motor Vehicle Taxation with Section 9, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 2(30), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 51, U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Liability of Financiers in Possession of Vehicles LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a financier is liable to pay motor vehicle tax after taking possession of a vehicle due to loan default. CASE TYPE: Motor Vehicle Taxation Case Name: Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. vs. State of U.P. and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 22

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Liability of Financiers in Possession of Vehicles: Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. vs. State of U.P. (22 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale of Temple Land After 23 Years: K. Kumara Gupta vs. Sri Markendaya and Sri Omkareswara Swamy Temple (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Endowments Act, 1987, Endowments Act, 1987 with Section 93, Indian Contract Act, Indian Contract Act with Tender-cum-auction, Judges, M.R. Shah, Management of Religious Institutions, Sale of Temple Properties, Sanctity of Contracts

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale of Temple Land After 23 Years: K. Kumara Gupta vs. Sri Markendaya and Sri Omkareswara Swamy Temple (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an auction sale conducted by a religious institution can be set aside after 23 years based on subsequent higher offers from non-participants. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale of Temple Land After 23 Years: K. Kumara Gupta vs. Sri Markendaya and Sri Omkareswara Swamy Temple (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court expunges High Court’s observations on tender discrimination: Union of India vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Limited (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Civil Law, Constitutional Law, Judges, Judicial Restraint, Judicial Review, M.R. Shah, Tender

Supreme Court expunges High Court’s observations on tender discrimination: Union of India vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Limited (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can make general observations about discrimination in tender processes without deciding the case on merits. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Union of India vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Limited &

Supreme Court expunges High Court’s observations on tender discrimination: Union of India vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale: Deenadayal Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. vs. Munjaji (2022)

/ Auction Law, Auction Sale, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 with Section 101, Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 with Rule 107, Recovery of Debt

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale: Deenadayal Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. vs. Munjaji (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in setting aside an auction sale due to alleged procedural irregularities under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961. CASE TYPE: Recovery of Debt/Cooperative Law Case Name: Deenadayal Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. & Another vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale: Deenadayal Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. vs. Munjaji (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top