B.V. Nagarathna

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Contractual Employment, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(oo)(bb), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-F, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-G, Judges, Labour Law, M.R. Shah, Unfair Labour Practices

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractual employee is entitled to reinstatement and back wages upon termination, or if a lump sum compensation is more appropriate. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Kalawati Pandurang […]

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court modifies reinstatement order for contractual employee: Divisional Controller, MSRTC vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(oo), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-F, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-G, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court modifies reinstatement order for contractual employee: Divisional Controller, MSRTC vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractual employee is entitled to reinstatement and back wages upon termination. CASE TYPE: Labour Law. Case Name: Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele. [Judgment Date]: 31 January 2022 Introduction Date

Supreme Court modifies reinstatement order for contractual employee: Divisional Controller, MSRTC vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Fulzele (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(oo)(bb), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-F, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-G, Judges, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 with Section 28

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Fulzele (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractual employee is entitled to reinstatement and back wages upon termination under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele [Judgment Date]: 31

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Fulzele (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition of Joint Family Property: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Civil Procedure, Civil Procedure with Order 7 Rule 11, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(1)(e), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 49, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition of Joint Family Property: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for partition is maintainable when a prior partition of joint family property has been established. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Partition Case Name: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy and Anr. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition of Joint Family Property: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(1)(e), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(2)(v), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 49, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior family partition, even if based on an unregistered arbitration award, bars a subsequent suit for partition of the same properties. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy and

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court converts dismissal to compulsory retirement in drunk driving case: Brijesh Chandra Dwivedi vs. Sanya Sahayak (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, M.R. Shah, Proportionality of Punishment, Service Law, Service Law with Compulsory Retirement

Supreme Court Converts Dismissal to Compulsory Retirement in Drunk Driving Case: Brijesh Chandra Dwivedi vs. Sanya Sahayak (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the punishment of dismissal for a driver found driving under the influence of alcohol is disproportionate to the misconduct proved. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Brijesh Chandra Dwivedi (Dead) Thr. LRs. vs. Sanya

Supreme Court converts dismissal to compulsory retirement in drunk driving case: Brijesh Chandra Dwivedi vs. Sanya Sahayak (2022) Read Post »

Drunk Driving Misconduct: Supreme Court Converts Dismissal to Compulsory Retirement

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Compulsory Retirement, Disciplinary Proceedings, Drunk Driving, Judges, M.R. Shah, Motor Vehicle Accidents, Proportionality, Punishment, Service Law

Supreme Court Converts Dismissal to Compulsory Retirement in Drunk Driving Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the punishment of dismissal for a driver found driving under the influence of alcohol is disproportionate to the misconduct proved. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Brijesh Chandra Dwivedi (Dead) Thr. LRs. vs. Sanya Sahayak and Ors. Judgment Date: 25

Drunk Driving Misconduct: Supreme Court Converts Dismissal to Compulsory Retirement Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(r), Consumer Rights, Contract Law, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36A, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36B, Unconscionable Contracts, Unfair Trade Practices

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1106 of 2009 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a real estate developer be held liable

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(r), Contract Law, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36A, Unfair Trade Practices

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 912 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. (authored by L. Nageswara Rao, J.) Can a real estate developer be held

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Reservation Powers: State of Punjab vs. Anshika Goyal (25 January 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 15(5), Education Law, Education Law with Punjab Private Health Sciences Educational Institutions Act, 2006, Fundamental Rights, Judges, M.R. Shah, Reservation Policy

Supreme Court on Reservation in Private Medical Colleges: State of Punjab vs. Anshika Goyal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can issue a writ of mandamus directing a State to provide specific reservations in private unaided educational institutions and to what extent the State is bound by its own policies regarding reservation. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Clarifies Reservation Powers: State of Punjab vs. Anshika Goyal (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission Order in DLF Housing Dispute: B.B. Patel & Ors. vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36A, Unconscionable Contract, Unfair Trade Practices

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission Order in DLF Housing Dispute: B.B. Patel & Ors. vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in handing over possession of apartments and the imposition of extra charges by a builder constitutes an unfair trade practice under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission Order in DLF Housing Dispute: B.B. Patel & Ors. vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Reservation in Private Medical Colleges: Supreme Court clarifies State’s power in State of Punjab vs. Anshika Goyal (25 January 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 15, Fundamental Rights, Judges, M.R. Shah, Punjab Private Health Sciences Educational Institutions Act, 2006, Punjab Private Health Sciences Educational Institutions Act, 2006 with Section 6

Supreme Court on Reservation in Private Medical Colleges: State of Punjab vs. Anshika Goyal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Can a High Court direct a State to provide specific reservations in private medical colleges? CASE TYPE: Education Law, Reservation Policy Case Name: The State of Punjab and Another vs. Anshika Goyal and others Judgment Date: 25 January

Reservation in Private Medical Colleges: Supreme Court clarifies State’s power in State of Punjab vs. Anshika Goyal (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top