Supreme Court clarifies compassionate appointment eligibility: Bank of Baroda vs. Baljit Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Eligibility criteria for compassionate appointment. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Bank of Baroda & Ors. vs. Baljit Singh [Judgment Date]: 21 June 2023 Date of the Judgment: 21 June 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 584 Judges: Justice B.V. Nagarathna and […]
Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Competition Act to Coal India Limited (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Competition Act, 2002 to Coal India Limited and its subsidiaries, which operate under a statutory monopoly. CASE TYPE: Competition Law Case Name: Coal India Limited and Anr. vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr. [Judgment Date]: 15 June
Competition Act Applicability: Supreme Court Rules on Coal India’s Monopoly (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Competition Act to Coal India Limited LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Competition Act, 2002 to Coal India Limited, a statutory monopoly. CASE TYPE: Competition Law Case Name: Coal India Limited and Anr. vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr. Judgment Date: 15 June 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 15
Date of the Judgment: June 15, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 575 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a company allot additional shares to existing shareholders when some shareholders choose not to participate? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case involving a dispute over share allotment in a
Supreme Court Upholds Share Allotment in Family Business Dispute: Hasmukhlal Madhavlal Patel vs. Ambika Food Products (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the allotment of shares in a private company was valid when existing shareholders were given the option to apply for additional shares, and some shareholders chose not to participate. CASE TYPE: Company Law Case Name:
Supreme Court Clarifies Advance Increments for Lecturers with PhDs: Sree Sankaracharya University vs. Dr. Manu (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether lecturers with a Ph.D. degree at the time of recruitment are eligible for additional advance increments upon placement in the selection grade. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit & Ors. vs.
Supreme Court Clarifies Advance Increments for Lecturers with PhDs: Sree Sankaracharya University vs. Dr. Manu (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government order clarifying the eligibility for advance increments to lecturers holding Ph.D. degrees can be applied retrospectively. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit & Ors. vs. Dr. Manu & Anr.
Supreme Court Clarifies Tax on Warranty Replacements in Automobile Sales (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether credit notes issued by manufacturers to dealers for replacing defective auto parts under warranty are subject to sales tax. CASE TYPE: Sales Tax Law Case Name: M/s. Tata Motors Ltd. vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes(SPL) & Anr. [Judgment Date]:
Supreme Court Clarifies Tax on Warranty Replacements: Tata Motors vs. Deputy Commissioner (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether credit notes issued by manufacturers to dealers for warranty replacements are subject to sales tax. CASE TYPE: Sales Tax Law Case Name: M/S. TATA MOTORS LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES(SPL) & ANR. [Judgment Date]: 15 May
Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership Contract: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. M/S. Sathyanarayana Service Station (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dealership agreement can be terminated by either party by giving a three-month notice, and if such termination requires acceptance by the other party. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Arbitration Law. Case Name: Indian Oil Corporation
Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership Contract: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. M/S. Sathyanarayana Service Station (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dealership agreement can be terminated by either party by giving a three-month notice, and whether the acceptance of such a notice is required for termination. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Arbitration Case Name: Indian Oil
Supreme Court Remands Income Tax Case: Glowshine Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the sale of development rights by a real estate developer should be treated as business income or capital gains under the Income Tax Act, 1961. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Commissioner of Income Tax 8 Mumbai vs.
