B.V. Nagarathna

Supreme Court Reinstates Murder Conviction in Fatal Assault Case: State of U.P. vs. Jai Dutt (2022)

Supreme Court Reinstates Murder Conviction in Fatal Assault Case: State of U.P. vs. Jai Dutt (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in converting a murder conviction to grievous hurt when the victim died due to a head injury sustained during the assault. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: State of U.P. vs. Jai […]

Supreme Court Reinstates Murder Conviction in Fatal Assault Case: State of U.P. vs. Jai Dutt (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Heinous Rape and Murder Case: Bhagwani vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Heinous Rape and Murder Case: Bhagwani vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 18, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 48 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J., and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a death sentence be commuted to life imprisonment even in

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Heinous Rape and Murder Case: Bhagwani vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Heinous Rape and Murder Case: Bhagwani vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Heinous Rape and Murder Case: Bhagwani vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the death penalty imposed by lower courts was justified in a case of rape and murder of a minor, considering the accused’s right to a fair trial and the possibility of

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Heinous Rape and Murder Case: Bhagwani vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Heinous Rape and Murder Case: Bhagwani vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) INSC 42

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Heinous Rape and Murder Case Date of the Judgment: January 18, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 42 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. The Supreme Court of India recently addressed a case involving the brutal rape and murder of an 11-year-old girl.

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Heinous Rape and Murder Case: Bhagwani vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) INSC 42 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act: Phoenix ARC Wins Against Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act: Phoenix ARC Wins Against Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Maintainability of writ petitions against private Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India concerning actions under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act: Phoenix ARC Wins Against Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act: Phoenix ARC Prevails Over Borrowers in Loan Recovery Dispute (12 January 2022)

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act: Phoenix ARC Prevails Over Borrowers in Loan Recovery Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Maintainability of writ petitions against private Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs) in matters related to the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act. CASE TYPE: Securitisation and Asset Reconstruction Law Case Name: Phoenix ARC

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act: Phoenix ARC Prevails Over Borrowers in Loan Recovery Dispute (12 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act: Phoenix ARC Wins Against Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir (12 January 2022)

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act: Phoenix ARC Wins Against Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is maintainable against a private Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) regarding actions under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act).

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act: Phoenix ARC Wins Against Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir (12 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism vs. Kandhari Beverages (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism vs. Kandhari Beverages (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of appellate jurisdiction under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Haryana Tourism Limited vs. M/s Kandhari Beverages Limited. Judgment Date: January 11, 2022 Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022. Citation: (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism vs. Kandhari Beverages (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism Ltd. vs. Kandhari Beverages Ltd. (2022)

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism Ltd. vs. Kandhari Beverages Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: The scope of appellate review under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Haryana Tourism Limited vs. M/s Kandhari Beverages Limited [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: January

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism Ltd. vs. Kandhari Beverages Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism Wins Against Kandhari Beverages in Contract Dispute (January 11, 2022)

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award in Haryana Tourism vs. Kandhari Beverages Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of appellate jurisdiction under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Haryana Tourism Limited vs. M/s Kandhari Beverages Limited. Judgment Date: January 11, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022.

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism Wins Against Kandhari Beverages in Contract Dispute (January 11, 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in Murder Case: Manoj Kumar Khokhar vs. State of Rajasthan (2022)

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in Murder Case: Manoj Kumar Khokhar vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court’s grant of bail was justified in a case of murder, considering the gravity of the offense and the manner in which it was committed. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Manoj Kumar Khokhar vs.

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in Murder Case: Manoj Kumar Khokhar vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Mother-in-Law for Cruelty: Meera vs. State (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Mother-in-Law for Cruelty: Meera vs. State (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 33 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a mother-in-law be held liable for cruelty towards her daughter-in-law? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this issue, upholding the conviction of

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Mother-in-Law for Cruelty: Meera vs. State (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top