Bela M. Trivedi

Supreme Court Rejects Recall of Order on Noida/Greater Noida Builders’ Interest Rates: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (28 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Civil Law, Interim Orders, Judges, Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 with Section 2, Recall of Orders, RERA

Supreme Court Rejects Recall of Order on Noida/Greater Noida Builders’ Interest Rates LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court should recall its previous order that had recalled interim orders granting interest rate reductions to builders in Noida and Greater Noida. CASE TYPE: Real Estate/Civil Case Name: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. […]

Supreme Court Rejects Recall of Order on Noida/Greater Noida Builders’ Interest Rates: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (28 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Lokayukta’s Power to Order Preliminary Inquiry: Office of the Odisha Lokayukta vs. Dr. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi (23 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Bias, Judges, Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014, Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014 with Section 20(1), Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014 with Section 25, Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014 with Section 28, Principles of Natural Justice, Right to Hearing

Supreme Court Upholds Lokayukta’s Power to Order Preliminary Inquiry: Office of the Odisha Lokayukta vs. Dr. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi (23 February 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Odisha Lokayukta can direct the Directorate of Vigilance to conduct a preliminary inquiry under Section 20(1) of the Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014. CASE TYPE: Corruption/Public Servant Case Name: Office

Supreme Court Upholds Lokayukta’s Power to Order Preliminary Inquiry: Office of the Odisha Lokayukta vs. Dr. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi (23 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Fast Track Court Service for High Court Elevation: C. Yamini vs. High Court of Andhra Pradesh (23 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 217, Interpretation of Constitution, Judges, Judicial Appointments, Seniority, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Fast Track Court Service for High Court Elevation: C. Yamini vs. High Court of Andhra Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether service as a District & Sessions Judge in a Fast Track Court can be considered as judicial service for elevation to the High Court under Article 217(2)(a) of the Constitution

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Fast Track Court Service for High Court Elevation: C. Yamini vs. High Court of Andhra Pradesh (23 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Child Murder Case: Vahitha vs. State of Tamil Nadu (22 February 2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 313, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 106, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Child Murder Case: Vahitha vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2023) Date of the Judgment: 22 February 2023 Citation: Not Available in the provided text. Judges: Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Bela M. Trivedi Can a mother be convicted for the murder of her own child based on circumstantial evidence? The

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Child Murder Case: Vahitha vs. State of Tamil Nadu (22 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Disparity Between Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (22 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Central Administrative Tribunal, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Judges, Pay Scales, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Disparity Between Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (2023) Date of the Judgment: 22 February 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 8329 of 2011 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi Can the judiciary interfere

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Disparity Between Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (22 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Pay Scales for Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (22 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Judges, Pay Scales, Service Law, Service Law with Fifth Central Pay Commission

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Pay Scales for Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the courts can interfere with the pay scales fixed by expert bodies like the Pay Commission. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association and Anr. Judgment Date: 22 February

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Pay Scales for Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (22 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Grant-in-Aid Rules for Minority Institutions: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 30, Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Fundamental Rights, Grant-in-Aid, Judges, Secondary Education Regulations, 1974

Supreme Court Upholds Grant-in-Aid Rules for Minority Institutions: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether minority educational institutions receiving government aid are exempt from the standard retirement age rules stipulated in the Grant-in-Aid Code. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Grant-in-Aid Case Name: The State of Gujarat & Ors. vs. H. B.

Supreme Court Upholds Grant-in-Aid Rules for Minority Institutions: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age for Aided Minority Schools: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 30, Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Fundamental Rights, Grant-in-Aid Code, Judges, Secondary Education Regulations, 1974

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age for Aided Minority Schools: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether aided minority educational institutions can set their own retirement age for teachers, or if they must adhere to government regulations. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: The State of Gujarat & Ors.

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age for Aided Minority Schools: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, B.R. Gavai, Bela M. Trivedi, Compassionate Appointment, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 18(3), Labour Law with Section 2(p), M.R. Shah, Pankaj Mithal, R. Banumathi, Sandeep Mehta, Service Law, T.S. Thakur

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 February 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M. Trivedi When a person dies while in service, can their dependent automatically get a job? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash (20 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash & Anr. (20 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Compassionate Appointment, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 18(3), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(p), Judges, Service Law

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash & Anr. (20 February 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dependent is entitled to compassionate appointment despite the presence of another earning family member. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Compassionate Appointment Case Name: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. & Others vs.

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on compassionate appointment: South Eastern Coalfield Ltd. vs. Gulshan Prakash & Anr. (20 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Based on Last Seen Theory in Murder Case: Ram Gopal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 106, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Based on Last Seen Theory in Murder Case Date of the Judgment: 17 February 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 129 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi Can a conviction for murder be upheld when the case rests primarily on circumstantial evidence and the “last seen

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Based on Last Seen Theory in Murder Case: Ram Gopal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction: Suresh vs. State of Kerala (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Criminal Procedure, Evidence, First Information Statement, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 449, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction: Suresh vs. State of Kerala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused’s actions constitute murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, or culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I of the same code. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Suresh vs. State of Kerala Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction: Suresh vs. State of Kerala (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top