C. Nagappan

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Sale of Poppy Straw: Girish Raghunath Mehta vs. Inspector of Customs (2016)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, C. Nagappan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Judges, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 42, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 43, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 67

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction for illegal sale of poppy straw under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is sustainable when the contraband was recovered from a public place and the accused made a statement under Section 67 of the Act. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Case […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Sale of Poppy Straw: Girish Raghunath Mehta vs. Inspector of Customs (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments Made 25 Years Ago in Bihar Gazetted Cadre Selection: Mirza Ali Raza & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (2016) INSC 36 (03 February 2016)

/ C. Nagappan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Fakir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, Judges, Judicial Review, Reservation Policy, Service Law, Service Law with Appointment

Can a State government alter the appointment of civil servants after 25 years based on a changed interpretation of reservation policies? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning appointments made in Bihar’s Gazetted Cadre in 1991. The Court’s decision focused on upholding the appointments of candidates who had been serving

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments Made 25 Years Ago in Bihar Gazetted Cadre Selection: Mirza Ali Raza & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (2016) INSC 36 (03 February 2016) Read Post »

Scroll to Top