C.T. Ravikumar

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Possession, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation is deposited in the treasury instead of being paid to […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) Date of the Judgment: February 9, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 107 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if compensation was deposited in the treasury instead of directly

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, C.T. Ravikumar, Claim Assessment, Consumer Law, Insurance Claims, Insurance Law, Insurance Law with Clause 6(b), Insurance Policy, Judges, Repudiation of Claims

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance claim can be repudiated for non-submission of documents when the surveyor has already assessed the loss. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law. Case Name: Karnavati Veneers Pvt. Ltd. vs. New India Assurance Company Limited and Others. [Judgment Date]: 9th February

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Breach of Policy Condition, C.T. Ravikumar, Consumer Law, Insurance Claims, Insurance Law, Insurance Law with Clause 6(b), Judges, Standard Fire & Special Perils Policy

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance company can repudiate a claim based on non-submission of documents when a surveyor has already assessed the loss. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law/Insurance Law Case Name: Karnavati Veneers Pvt. Ltd. vs. New India Assurance Company Limited and Others [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim: Karnavati Veneers vs. New India Assurance (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Shakeel Ahmed & Ors. (2023) INSC 111, Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Sh. Manish & Anr. (2023) INSC 110, Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Gupta & Ors. (2023) INSC 112, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. vs. Sh. Narender & Anr. (2023) INSC 113 (09 February 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse Date of the Judgment: 09 February 2023 Citations: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Shakeel Ahmed & Ors. (2023) INSC 111 Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Sh. Manish & Anr. (2023) INSC 110 Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Gupta & Ors. (2023)

Supreme Court overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Shakeel Ahmed & Ors. (2023) INSC 111, Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Sh. Manish & Anr. (2023) INSC 110, Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Gupta & Ors. (2023) INSC 112, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. vs. Sh. Narender & Anr. (2023) INSC 113 (09 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Shakeel Ahmed (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Shakeel Ahmed (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is

Supreme Court settles land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Shakeel Ahmed (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi: Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if physical possession is taken but compensation is not paid, or vice versa. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition by DDA, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition by DDA, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if physical possession is taken and compensation is not paid, or vice

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition by DDA, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of OCI Cardholders in NEET Admissions: Anushka Rengunthwar vs. Union of India (2023)

/ A.S. Bopanna, C.T. Ravikumar, Citizenship Act, 1955, Citizenship Act, 1955 with Section 7B, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Overseas Citizens of India (OCI)

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of OCI Cardholders in NEET Admissions: Anushka Rengunthwar vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) cardholders should be treated on par with Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) for admissions to educational institutions, specifically for seats not exclusively reserved for Indian citizens. CASE TYPE: Education/Citizenship Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of OCI Cardholders in NEET Admissions: Anushka Rengunthwar vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects OCI Cardholders’ Educational Rights: Anushka Rengunthwar vs. Union of India (2023)

/ A.S. Bopanna, C.T. Ravikumar, Citizenship Act, 1955, Citizenship Act, 1955 with Section 7A, Citizenship Act, 1955 with Section 7B(1), Citizenship Act, 1955 with Section 7B(2), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Fundamental Rights, Judges

Supreme Court Protects OCI Cardholders’ Educational Rights: Anushka Rengunthwar vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) cardholders can be restricted to only NRI quota seats for medical admissions, impacting their previously held rights. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Education, Citizenship Case Name: Anushka Rengunthwar & Ors. vs. Union of India

Supreme Court Protects OCI Cardholders’ Educational Rights: Anushka Rengunthwar vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Right to Possession in Encroachment Case: Baini Prasad vs. Durga Devi (2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Estoppel, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 115, Judges, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 51

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Right to Possession in Encroachment Case: Baini Prasad vs. Durga Devi (2023) Date of the Judgment: February 2, 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No.6182-6183 of 2009 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a person who encroaches on another’s land claim protection against eviction by citing improvements made on the

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Right to Possession in Encroachment Case: Baini Prasad vs. Durga Devi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Right to Possession in Encroachment Case: Baini Prasad vs. Durga Devi (2023) INSC 95 (02 February 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 136, Encroachment, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 115, Judges, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 51

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Right to Possession in Encroachment Case Date of the Judgment: 02 February 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 95 Judges: Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice C.T. Ravikumar Can a person who builds on someone else’s land claim protection from eviction based on the belief that the land was their own? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Right to Possession in Encroachment Case: Baini Prasad vs. Durga Devi (2023) INSC 95 (02 February 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top