C.T. Ravikumar

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi: Supreme Court on Land Acquisition Lapse LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development […]

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi and Ors. Judgment Date: 20 January 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Miss Hage Mamung (20 January 2023)

/ Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017 with Clause 38(v), C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Service Commission, Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 43 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a Public Service Commission award pro-rata marks to all candidates when answer keys are found to be wrong? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Miss Hage Mamung (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023)

/ Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, C.T. Ravikumar, Clause 38(v), Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, Examination, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Service Commission, Re-evaluation, Service Law

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can order re-evaluation of answer sheets when a Public Service Commission has already awarded pro-rata marks for questions with incorrect answer keys. CASE TYPE: Service Law; Public

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles applicability of ESI Act post amendment in establishments: ESI Corporation vs. Radhika Theatre (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 1, Judges, M. R. Shah, Social Security Legislation

ESI Act Applicability: Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Application of Amended Section 1(6) for Establishments Post-1989 Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 312 of 2023 (@ SLP(C) No. 12520 of 2022) Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can an establishment, once covered under the Employees’ State Insurance (ESI)

Supreme Court settles applicability of ESI Act post amendment in establishments: ESI Corporation vs. Radhika Theatre (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies ESI Act Applicability for Establishments Post 1989: ESI Corporation vs. Radhika Theatre (2023) INSC 602 (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 1(6), ESI Coverage, Judges, M. R. Shah, Social Security Legislation

ESI Act Applicability: Supreme Court Clarifies Coverage for Establishments Post 1989 LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Employees’ State Insurance (ESI) Act, 1948 to establishments with fluctuating employee numbers after the 1989 amendment. CASE TYPE: Social Security Law Case Name: The ESI Corporation vs. M/s. Radhika Theatre [Judgment Date]: 20 January 2023 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Clarifies ESI Act Applicability for Establishments Post 1989: ESI Corporation vs. Radhika Theatre (2023) INSC 602 (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Award, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 360 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) NO. 1493 OF 2023) (@ DIARY NO. 22629 OF 2021) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules Delhi HC on Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Locus Standi, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules Delhi HC on Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023) Date of the Judgment: January 20, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 64 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a person who is not the original landowner challenge a land acquisition? This question was

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules Delhi HC on Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 11, Land Acquisition Law with Section 18(a), M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a State Government is entitled to compensation, in addition to royalty, when its land is acquired under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Coal Land Acquisition: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 with Section 18(a), Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 with Section 2(d), Judges, Land Acquisition, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Coal Land Acquisition: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State Government is entitled to compensation for land acquired under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, in addition to royalty payments. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Mining Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Compensation in Coal Land Acquisition: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs. State of Odisha (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, even if possession is taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20 January 2023 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, even if possession is taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. Judgment Date: 20 January 2023 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top