C.T. Ravikumar

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta: Supreme Court Upholds Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken, but compensation is not paid, and whether a subsequent purchaser has the […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsing Claim by Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsing Claim by Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can challenge the acquisition of that land under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. CASE TYPE: Land

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsing Claim by Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation and Pre-Existing Dispute in Insolvency Cases: Sabarmati Gas vs. Shah Alloys (2023)

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation and Pre-Existing Dispute in Insolvency Cases: Sabarmati Gas vs. Shah Alloys (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the period of suspension of legal proceedings under the Sick Industrial Companies Act (SICA) can be excluded when calculating the limitation period for applications under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), and whether

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation and Pre-Existing Dispute in Insolvency Cases: Sabarmati Gas vs. Shah Alloys (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the stage for considering Section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code in criminal trials: Chandi Puliya vs. State of West Bengal (2022) INSC 1234 (12 December 2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies the Stage for Considering Section 300 CrPC in Criminal Trials Date of the Judgment: 12 December 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1234 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can an accused person be tried again for murder after being acquitted of kidnapping based on the same set of facts? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court clarifies the stage for considering Section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code in criminal trials: Chandi Puliya vs. State of West Bengal (2022) INSC 1234 (12 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: DDA vs. Raj Singh (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: DDA vs. Raj Singh (2022) Date of the Judgment: December 9, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 642 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to have lapsed if compensation was not directly paid to the landowners,

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: DDA vs. Raj Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Dayanand & Ors. (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Dayanand & Ors. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse if compensation is not paid to a subsequent purchaser, even if possession has been taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Dayanand & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Dharamvir & Ors. (2022) INSC 662

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Dharamvir & Ors. (2022) INSC 662 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Dharamvir & Ors. (2022) INSC 662 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies disclosure of Collegium decisions under RTI Act: Anjali Bhardwaj vs. CPIO (2022)

Supreme Court clarifies disclosure of Collegium decisions under RTI Act: Anjali Bhardwaj vs. CPIO (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether tentative decisions of the Supreme Court Collegium are required to be disclosed under the Right to Information Act, 2005. CASE TYPE: Right to Information. Case Name: Anjali Bhardwaj vs. CPIO, Supreme Court of India. [Judgment Date]: 09

Supreme Court clarifies disclosure of Collegium decisions under RTI Act: Anjali Bhardwaj vs. CPIO (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Appointment Despite Past Acquittal in Domestic Dispute: Pramod Singh Kirar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2 December 2022)

Supreme Court Allows Appointment Despite Past Acquittal in Domestic Dispute: Pramod Singh Kirar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a candidate can be denied appointment to a government job based on a past criminal case that resulted in acquittal. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Pramod Singh Kirar vs. State of Madhya

Supreme Court Allows Appointment Despite Past Acquittal in Domestic Dispute: Pramod Singh Kirar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishna Saini (2 December 2022)

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishna Saini (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, lapse due to non-payment of compensation under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013,

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Krishna Saini (2 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Karampal (2022)

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Karampal (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013,

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Karampal (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Sudesh Verma (2 December 2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act Date of the Judgment: 2 December 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 8929 of 2022 (@ SLP (C) No. 21810 of 2022) (@ DIARY NO. 27937 OF 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Sudesh Verma (2 December 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top