C.T. Ravikumar

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in transfer of cases under Administrative Tribunals Act: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022) INSC 182

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 25, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 5, C.T. Ravikumar, Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in transfer of cases under Administrative Tribunals Act: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022) INSC 182 LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the jurisdictional High Court for reviewing orders of transfer of cases by the Central Administrative Tribunal. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Administrative Law. Case Name: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay. Judgment […]

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in transfer of cases under Administrative Tribunals Act: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022) INSC 182 Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Challenging Tribunal Transfer Orders: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 25, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 5, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 323A, Constitutional Law with Article 323B, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Challenging Tribunal Transfer Orders: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct High Court jurisdiction for judicial review of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) transfer orders. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Administrative Law Case Name: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay Judgment Date: 06 January 2022 Date of

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Challenging Tribunal Transfer Orders: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition on Settlement: Navneet Kaur vs. Prabhjeet Singh Channa (2021)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Civil Procedure, Judges, Settlement of Disputes, Withdrawal of Case

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition on Settlement: Navneet Kaur vs. Prabhjeet Singh Channa (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Withdrawal of Transfer Petition upon settlement. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: Navneet Kaur vs. Prabhjeet Singh Channa. [Judgment Date]: November 15, 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: November 15, 2021. Citation: Not Available. Judges: Justice C.T. Ravikumar. Can a

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition on Settlement: Navneet Kaur vs. Prabhjeet Singh Channa (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Pupil-Teacher Ratio for Special Needs Education in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 132 of 2016 (28 October 2021)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Dinesh Maheshwari, Disability Law, Education Law, Inclusive Education, Judges, Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992, Right to Education Act, 2009, Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, Special Education

Supreme Court Directs Pupil-Teacher Ratio for Special Needs Education Date of the Judgment: 28 October 2021 Citation: Rajneesh Kumar Pandey & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2021) INSC 747 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. How can we ensure that children with special needs receive the quality education they

Supreme Court Directs Pupil-Teacher Ratio for Special Needs Education in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 132 of 2016 (28 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds KCOCA Invocation in Gauri Lankesh Murder Case: Kavitha Lankesh vs. State of Karnataka (21 October 2021)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Arms Act, 1959, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000, Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000 with Section 24, Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000 with Section 3, Offences Against Human Body, Organized Crime

Supreme Court Upholds KCOCA Invocation in Gauri Lankesh Murder Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether prior approval under Section 24(1)(a) of the Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000 (KCOCA) for recording information about an organized crime is valid, and whether the High Court was correct in quashing the chargesheet against an accused based on the interpretation

Supreme Court Upholds KCOCA Invocation in Gauri Lankesh Murder Case: Kavitha Lankesh vs. State of Karnataka (21 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Affirms National Green Tribunal’s Suo Motu Powers in Environmental Cases (7 October 2021)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 14, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 19, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 20

Supreme Court Affirms National Green Tribunal’s Suo Motu Powers in Environmental Cases (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has the power to initiate actions on its own (suo motu) in environmental matters. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, Tribunal Law Case Name: Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha & Ors. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Affirms National Green Tribunal’s Suo Motu Powers in Environmental Cases (7 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Abates Criminal Appeal Due to Death of Sole Respondent: State of U.P. vs. Mithun Singh (2021)

/ Abatement of Criminal Proceedings, C.T. Ravikumar, Criminal Law, Judges

Supreme Court Abates Criminal Appeal Due to Death of Sole Respondent: State of U.P. vs. Mithun Singh (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Abatement of criminal appeal due to the death of the sole respondent. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: State of U.P. vs. Mithun Singh [Judgment Date]: 24 September 2021 Date of the Judgment: 24 September

Supreme Court Abates Criminal Appeal Due to Death of Sole Respondent: State of U.P. vs. Mithun Singh (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top