C.T. Ravikumar

Supreme Court Denies Default Bail: Qamar Ghani Usmani vs. State of Gujarat (2023)

/ Bail, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 167, Default Bail, Investigation, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Denies Default Bail: Qamar Ghani Usmani vs. State of Gujarat (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an accused is entitled to statutory bail if they were not present when the trial court initially extended the investigation period. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Qamar Ghani Usmani vs. The State of Gujarat Judgment Date: 10 April 2023 […]

Supreme Court Denies Default Bail: Qamar Ghani Usmani vs. State of Gujarat (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Default Bail Despite Procedural Irregularity in Extension of Investigation: Qamar Ghani Usmani vs. State of Gujarat (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 167, Default Bail, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Default Bail Despite Procedural Irregularity in Extension of Investigation: Qamar Ghani Usmani vs. State of Gujarat (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an accused is entitled to statutory bail if they were not present when the trial court granted the first extension of time for investigation. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Default Bail Despite Procedural Irregularity in Extension of Investigation: Qamar Ghani Usmani vs. State of Gujarat (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court’s quashing of criminal proceedings in CBI vs. Aryan Singh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 365, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 452, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court overturns High Court’s quashing of criminal proceedings in CBI vs. Aryan Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) for quashing criminal proceedings at the pre-trial stage. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Aryan Singh Etc. Judgment Date: April 10,

Supreme Court overturns High Court’s quashing of criminal proceedings in CBI vs. Aryan Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order quashing criminal proceedings: CBI vs. Aryan Singh (2023) INSC 338 (10 April 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court overturns High Court order quashing criminal proceedings: CBI vs. Aryan Singh (2023) INSC 338 (10 April 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by quashing criminal proceedings at the stage of discharge. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Central

Supreme Court overturns High Court order quashing criminal proceedings: CBI vs. Aryan Singh (2023) INSC 338 (10 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) Date of the Judgment: April 10, 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1987 of 2023 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6169 of 2023) (@ Diary No.37735 of 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T.

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies penalty for late TDS remittance: US Technologies vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 201(1A), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 271C, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 273B, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Penalty for Late TDS Remittance: US Technologies vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether penalty under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is applicable on belated remittance of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS). CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: M/s US Technologies International Pvt. Ltd. vs. The

Supreme Court clarifies penalty for late TDS remittance: US Technologies vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Penalty for Late TDS Remittance Under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 201(1A), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 271C, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 276B, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Penalty for Late TDS Remittance Under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether penalty under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be levied for the belated remittance of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS). CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: M/s US Technologies International Pvt. Ltd.

Supreme Court Clarifies Penalty for Late TDS Remittance Under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Possessory Rights in Property Dispute: Shivshankara vs. Vedavyasa (2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLI Rule 27, Judges, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 6, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 52

Supreme Court Upholds Possessory Rights in Property Dispute: Shivshankara vs. Vedavyasa (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether prior possession can be the basis of a claim for recovery of possession against a dispossessor who does not have a better title. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Shivshankara & Anr. vs. H.P. Vedavyasa Char [Judgment Date]: March

Supreme Court Upholds Possessory Rights in Property Dispute: Shivshankara vs. Vedavyasa (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Yashpal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 161, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 82, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Yashpal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in granting bail to accused persons charged with serious offenses including murder, without considering the gravity of the offenses and the evidence against them. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Yashpal Singh vs.

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Yashpal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Yashpal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (28 March 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 82, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Yashpal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in granting bail to the accused in a case involving serious offenses such as murder, without providing sufficient reasons. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Yashpal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Yashpal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (28 March 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top