Supreme Court Directs Madhya Pradesh High Court to Adhere to 10% Quota in Judicial Appointments: Rajendra Kumar Shrivas vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 13, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 229 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a High Court exceed the 10% quota for appointments through limited […]
Supreme Court Directs Madhya Pradesh High Court to Adhere to 10% Quota in Judicial Appointments: Rajendra Kumar Shrivas vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court of Madhya Pradesh exceeded the 10% quota for appointments through limited departmental competitive examination as directed by the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Judicial Appointments
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Govt. vs. Dayanand (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken and notice issued to collect compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. vs. Dayanand & Anr. Judgment Date: March 13, 2023 Date
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Govt. vs. Dayanand (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land acquisition lapse in Delhi: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the locus standi to challenge the acquisition of said land, and whether the acquisition proceedings are deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the
Supreme Court on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the locus standi to challenge the acquisition of land under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 13, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 229 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities could not take possession
Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding deemed lapse of land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Land
Supreme Court Clarifies Input Tax Credit Claims Under Karnataka VAT Act Date of the Judgment: 13 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 208 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a purchasing dealer claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) merely by producing invoices and payment records, or is there a higher burden of proof? The
Karnataka VAT Act: Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit Date of the Judgment: 13 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 212 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a purchasing dealer claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) merely by producing invoices and payment receipts, or is there a higher burden of
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Lack Locus Standi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the right to challenge land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr. vs. M/s. Beads Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 13, 2023 Introduction Date
Supreme Court rules subsequent purchasers cannot challenge land acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. M/s. Beads Properties Pvt. Ltd. (2023) Date of the Judgment: 13 March 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 213 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a person who buys land after the government has already started the process of
Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. B.S. Dhillon (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 13, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 226 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities have not taken possession
