Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud

Continuing Deficiency of Service: Supreme Court rules on limitation in Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022)

/ AS Bopanna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(1)(g), Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 24A, Deficiency in Service, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 22, Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963, Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 with Section 3, Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 with Section 6

Supreme Court on Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No 4000 of 2019 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and AS Bopanna, J Can a builder’s failure to obtain an occupancy certificate […]

Continuing Deficiency of Service: Supreme Court rules on limitation in Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Continuing Deficiency in Service: Supreme Court rules on Limitation in Consumer Disputes: Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction (2022)

/ AS Bopanna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(1)(g), Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 24A, Deficiency in Service, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 22, Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963, Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 with Section 12, Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 with Section 3, Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 with Section 6

Supreme Court on Continuing Wrong in Consumer Disputes: Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the failure to obtain an occupancy certificate by a builder constitutes a continuing wrong, thereby extending the limitation period for filing a consumer complaint. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.

Continuing Deficiency in Service: Supreme Court rules on Limitation in Consumer Disputes: Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Nationwide Implementation of Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centers: Smruti Tukaram Badade vs. State of Maharashtra (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 273, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 327, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Criminal Procedure, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Gita Mittal, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 354, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 377, Judges, Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 with Section 2(s), Offences Against Human Body, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Directs Establishment of Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centers Across India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Ensuring a safe and barrier-free environment for recording the evidence of vulnerable witnesses. CASE TYPE: Criminal Procedure Case Name: Smruti Tukaram Badade vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022 Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022 Citation:

Supreme Court Directs Nationwide Implementation of Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centers: Smruti Tukaram Badade vs. State of Maharashtra (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Expands Definition of Vulnerable Witnesses and Mandates Deposition Centers

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 327, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 118, Judges, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Expands Definition of Vulnerable Witnesses and Mandates Deposition Centers LEGAL ISSUE: Defining “vulnerable witness” and ensuring a safe environment for their testimony. CASE TYPE: Criminal Procedure Case Name: Smruti Tukaram Badade v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 11 January 2022 Date of the Judgment: 11 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 392

Supreme Court Expands Definition of Vulnerable Witnesses and Mandates Deposition Centers Read Post »

Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Supreme Court rules in favor of Homebuyers in Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022)

/ AS Bopanna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 24A, Consumer Rights, Continuing Cause of Action, Deficiency in Service, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Limitation Act 1963, Limitation Act 1963 with Section 22, Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act 1963, Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act 1963 with Section 6, Promoter's Obligations

Supreme Court on Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the failure to obtain an occupancy certificate constitutes a continuing cause of action in a consumer dispute, allowing for claims beyond the standard limitation period. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case

Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Supreme Court rules in favor of Homebuyers in Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Nationwide Implementation of Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centers

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 327, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 354, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 377, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Surya Kant, Trials and Inquiries

Supreme Court Directs Establishment of Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centers Across India LEGAL ISSUE: Implementation of Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centers. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Smruti Tukaram Badade v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 11 January 2022 Date of the Judgment: 11 January 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and

Supreme Court Directs Nationwide Implementation of Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centers Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds OBC, EWS Reservations in NEET Admissions for 2021-22

/ AS Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds OBC, EWS Reservations in NEET Admissions for 2021-22 Date of the Judgment: January 7, 2022 The Supreme Court of India addressed the legality of Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) reservations in the All India Quota (AIQ) seats for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for postgraduate (PG)

Supreme Court Upholds OBC, EWS Reservations in NEET Admissions for 2021-22 Read Post »

Supreme Court allows OBC and EWS Reservations for NEET Admissions 2021-22: Neil Aurelio Nunes & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2022) INSC 21 (07 January 2022)

/ AS Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Education Law, Fundamental Rights, Judges, NEET Admissions, Reservation Policy

Date of the Judgment: 07 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 21 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and AS Bopanna J. Can reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) be implemented in the All India Quota (AIQ) seats for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET)? This question was at the

Supreme Court allows OBC and EWS Reservations for NEET Admissions 2021-22: Neil Aurelio Nunes & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2022) INSC 21 (07 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the process for payment of Resolution Professional Fees in cases where CIRP is set aside: Devarajan Raman vs. Bank of India Limited (2022) INSC 1

/ A.S. Bopanna, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 60(5)(c), Judges, Resolution Professional Fees

Supreme Court clarifies the process for payment of Resolution Professional Fees in cases where CIRP is set aside: Devarajan Raman vs. Bank of India Limited (2022) INSC 1 Date of the Judgment: January 5, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and A.S. Bopanna, J. Can a Resolution Professional (RP) be

Supreme Court clarifies the process for payment of Resolution Professional Fees in cases where CIRP is set aside: Devarajan Raman vs. Bank of India Limited (2022) INSC 1 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the process for payment of Resolution Professional fees in Corporate Insolvency Cases: Devarajan Raman vs. Bank of India Limited (2022) INSC 142 (05 January 2022)

/ A S Bopanna, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 60(5)(c), Judges, Resolution Professional Fees

Supreme Court clarifies the process for payment of Resolution Professional fees in Corporate Insolvency Cases: Devarajan Raman vs. Bank of India Limited (2022) INSC 142 (05 January 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the proper procedure for determining and disbursing the fees and costs of a Resolution Professional (RP) in a Corporate

Supreme Court clarifies the process for payment of Resolution Professional fees in Corporate Insolvency Cases: Devarajan Raman vs. Bank of India Limited (2022) INSC 142 (05 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the process for determining Resolution Professional fees in Corporate Insolvency: Devarajan Raman vs. Bank of India Limited (05 January 2022)

/ A S Bopanna, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 60(5)(c), Insolvency Resolution Process Cost, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Resolution Professional Fee Determination in Insolvency Cases Date of the Judgment: 05 January 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No 3160 of 2020 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and A S Bopanna, J. Can an adjudicating authority arbitrarily reduce the fees of a Resolution Professional (RP) without proper justification? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court clarifies the process for determining Resolution Professional fees in Corporate Insolvency: Devarajan Raman vs. Bank of India Limited (05 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Preference-Based Selection in Public Service Exams: Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Manish Bakawale (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Madhya Pradesh State Civil Services Rules, 2015, Madhya Pradesh State Civil Services Rules, 2015 with Rule 4(3)(c)(2), Public Service Commission, Recruitment Rules, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Preference-Based Selection in Public Service Exams: Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Manish Bakawale (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of rules regarding preference-based selection in public service examinations when a candidate is found ineligible for a higher preferred post. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission vs.

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Preference-Based Selection in Public Service Exams: Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Manish Bakawale (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top