Dinesh Maheshwari

Supreme Court on Transfer of Recognition of Derecognized Ashram Schools: Sant Dnyaneshwar Shikshan Sansthan vs. State of Maharashtra (2019)

/ Ashram Schools, Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Education Law with Government Resolution dated 01.08.2007, Judges, School Recognition, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court on Transfer of Recognition of Derecognized Ashram Schools: Sant Dnyaneshwar Shikshan Sansthan vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the recognition of a derecognized Ashram School can be transferred to another entity. CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Sant Dnyaneshwar Shikshan Sansthan and Anr. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. Judgment […]

Supreme Court on Transfer of Recognition of Derecognized Ashram Schools: Sant Dnyaneshwar Shikshan Sansthan vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Settlement Commission’s power on interest waiver: Kakadia Builders vs. Income Tax Officer (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 234A, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 245D, Judges, Settlement Commission

Supreme Court clarifies Settlement Commission’s power on interest waiver: Kakadia Builders vs. Income Tax Officer (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Settlement Commission has the power to waive or reduce interest payable under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Kakadia Builders Pvt. Ltd. &

Supreme Court clarifies Settlement Commission’s power on interest waiver: Kakadia Builders vs. Income Tax Officer (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Protected Tenancy for Land Misuse: Gaddam Ramulu vs. Joint Collector (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 with Section 19, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 with Section 40, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 with Section 48-A, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Protected Tenancy for Land Misuse: Gaddam Ramulu vs. Joint Collector (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the transfer of land by a protected tenant for purposes other than cultivation warrants cancellation of the tenancy rights under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. CASE TYPE: Land Tenancy Law

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Protected Tenancy for Land Misuse: Gaddam Ramulu vs. Joint Collector (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Income Tax Case for Fresh Adjudication: Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s Rashtradoot (HUF) (27 February 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Dinesh Maheshwari, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 260A, Judges

Supreme Court Remands Income Tax Case: Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s Rashtradoot (HUF) (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the Revenue’s appeal without framing substantial questions of law and providing reasons for its decision. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Appeal Case Name: Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s Rashtradoot (HUF) [Judgment

Supreme Court Remands Income Tax Case for Fresh Adjudication: Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s Rashtradoot (HUF) (27 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court modifies interim order on land compensation: GMDA vs. Arminderjit Kaur (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appeals, Civil Procedure, Compensation, Dinesh Maheshwari, Interim Relief, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act

Supreme Court modifies interim order on land compensation: GMDA vs. Arminderjit Kaur (2019) Date of the Judgment: February 26, 2019 Citation: Not Available Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. and Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can a High Court, in an interim order, direct the deposit of a specific amount of compensation in a land acquisition case? The

Supreme Court modifies interim order on land compensation: GMDA vs. Arminderjit Kaur (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Belated Amendment to Plaint in Property Partition Suit: Vijay Hathising Shah vs. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Amendment of Pleadings, Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Order VI, Rule 17, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Partition Suits, Property Law

Supreme Court Rejects Belated Amendment to Plaint in Property Partition Suit: Vijay Hathising Shah vs. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a trial court is justified in rejecting a belated application for amendment of a plaint when the trial is nearing completion. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Partition) Case Name: Vijay Hathising Shah & Anr.

Supreme Court Rejects Belated Amendment to Plaint in Property Partition Suit: Vijay Hathising Shah vs. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Road Accident Case: Subhash Chand vs. State of Punjab (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 279, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304-A, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Road Accident Case: Subhash Chand vs. State of Punjab (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused was rightly identified as the driver of the offending vehicle in a fatal road accident case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Subhash Chand vs. State of Punjab [Judgment Date]: 25th February, 2019 Date of

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Road Accident Case: Subhash Chand vs. State of Punjab (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Injunctions in Property Dispute: Shri Revansiddeshwar Pattan Sahakari Bank Niyamit vs. Taluka Tokrekoli (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 39, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 151, Dinesh Maheshwari, Injunctions, Judges, Temporary Injunctions

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Injunctions in Property Dispute: Shri Revansiddeshwar Pattan Sahakari Bank Niyamit vs. Taluka Tokrekoli (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in granting an injunction to the plaintiff when the plaintiff’s injunction application had been dismissed by the Trial Court and not appealed. CASE TYPE: Civil

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Injunctions in Property Dispute: Shri Revansiddeshwar Pattan Sahakari Bank Niyamit vs. Taluka Tokrekoli (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Erroneous Conviction in Murder Case: Deep Narayan Chourasia vs. State of Bihar (25 February 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 354, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Sets Aside Erroneous Conviction in Murder Case: Deep Narayan Chourasia vs. State of Bihar (2019) Date of the Judgment: 25 February 2019 Citation: Deep Narayan Chourasia vs. State of Bihar, Criminal Appeal No.180 of 2019 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. and Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can a High Court convict an accused of a

Supreme Court Sets Aside Erroneous Conviction in Murder Case: Deep Narayan Chourasia vs. State of Bihar (25 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Bus Accident Case: Thangasamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu (20 February 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 279, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304-A, Judges, Offences Affecting Life

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Bus Accident Case: Thangasamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused was rightly convicted for causing death and injuries due to rash and negligent driving. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Motor Vehicle Accident Case Name: Thangasamy vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Judgment Date: 20

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Fatal Bus Accident Case: Thangasamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu (20 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Sentence in Culpable Homicide Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Suresh (20 February 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 174, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Sentence in Culpable Homicide Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Suresh (2019) Date of the Judgment: 20 February 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 132 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can a High Court reduce a sentence awarded by a Trial Court without sufficient justification? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court’s Sentence in Culpable Homicide Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Suresh (20 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Dying Declaration: Laltu Ghosh vs. State of West Bengal (2019) INSC 123

/ Dinesh Maheshwari, Dying Declaration, Evidence Law, Eyewitness Testimony, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Dying Declaration: Laltu Ghosh vs. State of West Bengal (2019) INSC 123 LEGAL ISSUE: Admissibility and reliability of eyewitness testimony and dying declarations in criminal cases. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Laltu Ghosh vs. State of West Bengal [Judgment Date]: 19 February 2019

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Dying Declaration: Laltu Ghosh vs. State of West Bengal (2019) INSC 123 Read Post »

Scroll to Top