Dinesh Maheshwari

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Leadership Dispute (23 Feb 2023)

/ All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Civil Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Hrishikesh Roy, Interim Injunction, Internal Management of Political Party, Judges, Rule 19(vii), AIADMK Byelaws, Rule 20A, AIADMK Byelaws

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Leadership Dispute (23 Feb 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Internal management and leadership disputes within a political party. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Thiru K. Palaniswamy vs. M. Shanmugam & Ors. Judgment Date: 23 February 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 23 February 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC […]

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Leadership Dispute (23 Feb 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Leadership Dispute: Thiru K. Palaniswamy vs. M. Shanmugam & Ors. (23 February 2023)

/ Civil Procedure, Civil Procedure with Order 39, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Dinesh Maheshwari, Hrishikesh Roy, Interim Injunctions, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Leadership Dispute Date of the Judgment: 23 February 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 1562 Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, J. and Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a political party’s internal disputes be resolved by the courts? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in a case concerning the All India Anna

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Leadership Dispute: Thiru K. Palaniswamy vs. M. Shanmugam & Ors. (23 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Child Murder Case: Vahitha vs. State of Tamil Nadu (22 February 2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 313, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 106, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Child Murder Case: Vahitha vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2023) Date of the Judgment: 22 February 2023 Citation: Not Available in the provided text. Judges: Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Bela M. Trivedi Can a mother be convicted for the murder of her own child based on circumstantial evidence? The

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Child Murder Case: Vahitha vs. State of Tamil Nadu (22 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (21 February 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 406, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 142, Sanjay Kumar, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can transfer cheque dishonor cases under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 despite the specific jurisdiction outlined in Section 142(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. CASE TYPE: Criminal, Negotiable Instruments Act Case Name:

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (21 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases for Consolidated Trial: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (21 February 2023)

/ Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 406, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 142, Sanjay Kumar, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases for Consolidated Trial LEGAL ISSUE: Whether cases related to cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be transferred to a different court for a consolidated trial, despite the jurisdictional provisions of Section 142 of the same Act. CASE TYPE: Criminal, Negotiable Instruments Act Case

Supreme Court Transfers Cheque Dishonour Cases for Consolidated Trial: Yogesh Upadhyay vs. Atlanta Limited (21 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Grant-in-Aid Rules for Minority Institutions: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 30, Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Fundamental Rights, Grant-in-Aid, Judges, Secondary Education Regulations, 1974

Supreme Court Upholds Grant-in-Aid Rules for Minority Institutions: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether minority educational institutions receiving government aid are exempt from the standard retirement age rules stipulated in the Grant-in-Aid Code. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Grant-in-Aid Case Name: The State of Gujarat & Ors. vs. H. B.

Supreme Court Upholds Grant-in-Aid Rules for Minority Institutions: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age for Aided Minority Schools: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 30, Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Fundamental Rights, Grant-in-Aid Code, Judges, Secondary Education Regulations, 1974

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age for Aided Minority Schools: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether aided minority educational institutions can set their own retirement age for teachers, or if they must adhere to government regulations. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: The State of Gujarat & Ors.

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age for Aided Minority Schools: State of Gujarat vs. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust (2023) Read Post »

Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Supreme Court clarifies position in Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023)

/ Administrative Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Examination and Evaluation, Judges, Judicial Review, Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets, Sanjay Kumar, University Regulations, Writ of Mandamus

Supreme Court on Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023) Introduction Date of the Judgment: 14 February 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 116 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Can a High Court order re-evaluation of answer sheets when the university’s statutes do

Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Supreme Court clarifies position in Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023)

/ Dinesh Maheshwari, Education Law, Judges, Judicial Review of Academic Matters, Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets, Sanjay Kumar, University Regulations

Supreme Court Limits Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can direct re-evaluation of answer sheets when the university’s statute does not provide for it. CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Dr. B R Ambedkar University, Agra vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta &

Supreme Court Limits Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets: Dr. B R Ambedkar University vs. Devarsh Nath Gupta (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Rent Dispute: Shyam Kumar Gupta vs. Shubham Jain (2 February 2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX Rule 13, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 with Section 17

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Rent Dispute: Shyam Kumar Gupta vs. Shubham Jain (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an ex-parte decree in a rent dispute should be set aside when the tenant has deposited the principal amount of rent and cost, but not the mesne profits, as required under Section 17 of the

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Rent Dispute: Shyam Kumar Gupta vs. Shubham Jain (2 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Unauthorised Use of Electricity” in Kerala State Electricity Board vs. Thomas Joseph (2022)

/ Dinesh Maheshwari, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 126, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 181, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 50, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies “Unauthorised Use of Electricity” in Kerala State Electricity Board vs. Thomas Joseph (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether consumption of electricity exceeding the connected/contracted load constitutes “unauthorised use of electricity.” CASE TYPE: Electricity Law Case Name: Kerala State Electricity Board & Ors. vs. Thomas Joseph Alias Thomas M. J. & Ors. Judgment Date: 16

Supreme Court Clarifies “Unauthorised Use of Electricity” in Kerala State Electricity Board vs. Thomas Joseph (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Delhi HC Order on Additional Evidence in Murder Case: Lakhan Singh vs. Amarjeet Singh (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 311, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 330, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 391, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 84, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Sets Aside Delhi HC Order on Additional Evidence in Murder Case: Lakhan Singh vs. Amarjeet Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can allow additional evidence in a criminal appeal on grounds already considered by the Trial Court and affirmed by the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: Lakhan Singh

Supreme Court Sets Aside Delhi HC Order on Additional Evidence in Murder Case: Lakhan Singh vs. Amarjeet Singh (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top