Dinesh Maheshwari

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Petitions Challenging Bonus Act Amendment: Union of India vs. United Planters Association (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 139A, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Judicial Review, Labour Law, Labour Law with Section 2(13), Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Petitions Challenging Bonus Act Amendment: Union of India vs. United Planters Association (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015 should be transferred to the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Labour Law Case Name: Union of India vs. The […]

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Petitions Challenging Bonus Act Amendment: Union of India vs. United Planters Association (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Striking Off Defence for Non-Payment of Rent: Asha Rani Gupta vs. Vineet Kumar (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XV Rule 5, Dinesh Maheshwari, Eviction, Judges, Landlord and Tenant Law, Procedural Law, Rent Recovery, Tenant Obligations

Supreme Court Upholds Striking Off Defence for Non-Payment of Rent: Asha Rani Gupta vs. Vineet Kumar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant’s defense can be struck off for failing to deposit rent as per Order XV Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, even if the tenant denies the landlord-tenant relationship. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Striking Off Defence for Non-Payment of Rent: Asha Rani Gupta vs. Vineet Kumar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Homemaker’s Death: Chandrasekharan vs. Dinakar (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Compensation Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Homemaker Compensation, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 168, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Homemaker’s Death: Chandrasekharan vs. Dinakar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of pecuniary loss in motor accident claims involving the death of a homemaker. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: S. Chandrasekharan & Ors. vs. M. Dinakar & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 11th July 2022 Date of the Judgment: 11th July 2022

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Homemaker’s Death: Chandrasekharan vs. Dinakar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies maintenance charges and delay compensation in real estate: Utpal Trehan vs DLF Home Developers Ltd. (11 July 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Apartment Buyers’ Agreement, Breach of contract, Consumer Law, Consumer Law with Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Consumer Law with National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Consumer Protection Act, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 19, Delay Compensation, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Maintenance Charges, Real Estate Law, Real Estate Regulation

Supreme Court on Maintenance Charges and Delay Compensation in Real Estate: Utpal Trehan vs DLF Home Developers Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a builder can collect maintenance charges from a flat buyer before handing over possession and the extent of delay compensation. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law/Real Estate. Case Name: Utpal Trehan vs DLF Home Developers

Supreme Court clarifies maintenance charges and delay compensation in real estate: Utpal Trehan vs DLF Home Developers Ltd. (11 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bail in NDPS Case: State of West Bengal vs. Rakesh Singh (11 July 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 161, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 164, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 27A, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 37, Offences and Penalties

Supreme Court Upholds Bail in NDPS Case: State of West Bengal vs. Rakesh Singh LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in granting bail to an accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), particularly when the accused was charged under Section 27A of the NDPS Act. CASE TYPE: Criminal

Supreme Court Upholds Bail in NDPS Case: State of West Bengal vs. Rakesh Singh (11 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal’s Order on Disciplinary Proceedings Time Limits: Union of India vs. Sharvan Kumar (2022)

/ Administrative Law, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 14, Dinesh Maheshwari, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Judicial Review, Krishna Murari, Service Law, Time Limits, Tribunal Orders, Union of India vs. Sharvan Kumar

Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal’s Order on Disciplinary Proceedings Time Limits: Union of India vs. Sharvan Kumar (2022) Date of the Judgment: July 6, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 600 Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can a disciplinary proceeding be considered invalid simply because it wasn’t completed within a timeframe set by a Tribunal? The

Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal’s Order on Disciplinary Proceedings Time Limits: Union of India vs. Sharvan Kumar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Locus Standi of Third Parties in Criminal Appeals: Zakia Ahsan Jafri vs. State of Gujarat (24 June 2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 173(8), Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 190, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges

Supreme Court Settles Locus Standi of Third Parties in Criminal Appeals: Zakia Ahsan Jafri vs. State of Gujarat (2022) Date of the Judgment: 24 June 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 532 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari, and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ. Can a third party, not directly involved in a criminal case, have the right to intervene

Supreme Court Settles Locus Standi of Third Parties in Criminal Appeals: Zakia Ahsan Jafri vs. State of Gujarat (24 June 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Heinous Rape and Murder Case of a Minor: Manoj Pratap Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (24 June 2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 235(2), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 354(3), Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376(2)(f), Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 with Section 6

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Heinous Rape and Murder Case of a Minor: Manoj Pratap Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the death penalty should be upheld in a case involving the brutal rape and murder of a minor with mental and physical challenges, where the accused was convicted based on

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Heinous Rape and Murder Case of a Minor: Manoj Pratap Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (24 June 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies suit valuation for mandatory injunctions: Bharat Bhushan Gupta vs. Pratap Narain Verma (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order VII Rule 11, Court Fees Act, 1870, Court Fees Act, 1870 with Section 7(iv)(d), Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Suit Valuation, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Suit Valuation for Injunctions: Bharat Bhushan Gupta vs. Pratap Narain Verma (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct method for valuing a suit seeking a mandatory injunction, particularly in cases involving property and licenses. CASE TYPE: Civil Law (Property and Injunctions) Case Name: Bharat Bhushan Gupta vs. Pratap Narain Verma & Anr. Judgment

Supreme Court clarifies suit valuation for mandatory injunctions: Bharat Bhushan Gupta vs. Pratap Narain Verma (2022) Read Post »

Territorial Jurisdiction in Rape Cases: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Ms. P vs. State of Uttarakhand (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 220, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376, Judges, Jurisdiction of Courts, Offences Against Women, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge in Rape Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction: Ms. P vs. State of Uttarakhand (2022) Date of the Judgment: June 16, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 549 Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, J., Vikram Nath, J. Can offenses occurring in different locations be tried together? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Territorial Jurisdiction in Rape Cases: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Ms. P vs. State of Uttarakhand (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MCOCA Sanction in Kidnapping Case: Abhishek vs. State of Maharashtra (20 May 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Continuing Unlawful Activity, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 363, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 364A, Judges, Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 with Section 23, Offences Against Human Body, Organised Crime

Supreme Court Upholds MCOCA Sanction in Kidnapping Case: Abhishek vs. State of Maharashtra (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of sanction for prosecution under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Abhishek vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Judgment Date: 20 May 2022 Date of the Judgment: 20 May

Supreme Court Upholds MCOCA Sanction in Kidnapping Case: Abhishek vs. State of Maharashtra (20 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Child Rape and Murder Case: Veerendra vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 53A, Constitutional Law, Criminal Procedure, Dinesh Maheshwari, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Child Rape and Murder Case: Veerendra vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a death sentence awarded in a case of rape and murder of a minor based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable, and whether the sentence can be commuted to life imprisonment. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Child Rape and Murder Case: Veerendra vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top