Dipak Misra

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Employees Between Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand: Krishan Kumar Madan vs. Ashok Kumar (29 August 2018)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Employee Transfer, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Service Law, State Reorganization, Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000, Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 with Section 77

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Employees Between Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees appointed by the State of Uttar Pradesh can be transferred to the State of Uttarakhand based on mutual consent, even if their appointments occurred after the cut-off date for automatic allocation under the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000. CASE TYPE: […]

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Employees Between Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand: Krishan Kumar Madan vs. Ashok Kumar (29 August 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies insurer liability in cases of fake driving licenses: Ram Chandra Singh vs. Rajaram (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Dipak Misra, Insurance Law, Judges, Liability of Insurers, Motor Insurance, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 149(2)(a)(ii)

Supreme Court clarifies insurer liability in cases of fake driving licenses: Ram Chandra Singh vs. Rajaram (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance company can be absolved of liability in a motor accident claim if the driver of the offending vehicle had a fake driving license. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Claim Case Name: Ram Chandra Singh

Supreme Court clarifies insurer liability in cases of fake driving licenses: Ram Chandra Singh vs. Rajaram (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit: Lakshmi Sreenivasa Cooperative Building Society vs. Puvvada Rama (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Burden of Proof, Contract Law, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 114, Judges, Specific Performance, Specific Relief Act, 1963

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit: Lakshmi Sreenivasa Cooperative Building Society vs. Puvvada Rama (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for specific performance can be decreed when the execution of the underlying agreement is not proven. CASE TYPE: Civil (Specific Performance) Case Name: Lakshmi Sreenivasa Cooperative Building Society vs. Puvvada Rama (Dead) by

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit: Lakshmi Sreenivasa Cooperative Building Society vs. Puvvada Rama (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs Delhi High Court to Reconsider CBI Investigation Order in DGR Scam (31 July 2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Central Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Law, D.Y. Chandrachud, Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 with Section 1946, Dipak Misra, Investigation, Judges, Preliminary Enquiry

Supreme Court directs Delhi High Court to Reconsider CBI Investigation Order in DGR Scam (31 July 2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should be directed to register a First Information Report (FIR) and investigate allegations of corruption and irregularities, even after a preliminary enquiry (PE) concluded no involvement of public servants

Supreme Court directs Delhi High Court to Reconsider CBI Investigation Order in DGR Scam (31 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies insurer’s liability in motor accident claims: Rani vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges, Motor Accident Claims, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 149(2)(a)(i)(a)

Supreme Court clarifies insurer’s liability in motor accident claims: Rani vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the liability of an insurance company when the vehicle involved in an accident lacks a valid permit for the area where the accident occurred. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Claims Case Name: Rani & Ors. vs. National

Supreme Court clarifies insurer’s liability in motor accident claims: Rani vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Production of Additional Maps in Assam-Nagaland Border Dispute: State of Assam vs. Union of India (20 July 2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 14, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XI Rule 14, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges, Production of Documents

Supreme Court Allows Assam to Produce Additional Maps in Border Dispute Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether additional documents can be produced during the recording of evidence in an ongoing suit. CASE TYPE: Civil Original Jurisdiction (Boundary Dispute) Case Name: State of Assam vs. Union of India and Ors. Judgment Date: 20 July 2018 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Allows Production of Additional Maps in Assam-Nagaland Border Dispute: State of Assam vs. Union of India (20 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Nutan Rani vs. Gurmail Singh (20 July 2018)

/ A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Future Prospects, Judges, Motor Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Nutan Rani vs. Gurmail Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of compensation in motor accident claims, specifically regarding future prospects and interest rates. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Nutan Rani and Anr vs. Gurmail Singh and Ors [Judgment Date]: 20 July 2018 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Nutan Rani vs. Gurmail Singh (20 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Mother to Keep Child in India, Overturns Delhi High Court Order

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Constitutional Law with Article 226, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 26, Judges

Supreme Court Allows Mother to Keep Child in India, Overturns Delhi High Court Order LEGAL ISSUE: International Child Custody and Habeas Corpus; CASE TYPE: Family Law; Case Name: Mrs. Kanika Goel vs. State of Delhi and Anr.; Judgment Date: 20 July 2018 Date of the Judgment: 20 July 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 647 Judges: Dipak

Supreme Court Allows Mother to Keep Child in India, Overturns Delhi High Court Order Read Post »

Supreme Court issues guidelines to curb mob violence and lynching: Tehseen S. Poonawalla vs. Union of India (17 July 2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 129, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 357A, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 256, Constitutional Law with Article 32, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 153A, Judges, Offences against Public Tranquility

Supreme Court Guidelines on Mob Violence and Lynching: Tehseen S. Poonawalla vs. Union of India (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Guidelines to prevent and address mob violence and lynching. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Tehseen S. Poonawalla vs. Union of India and others Judgment Date: 17 July 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 17 July

Supreme Court issues guidelines to curb mob violence and lynching: Tehseen S. Poonawalla vs. Union of India (17 July 2018) Read Post »

Right of First Refusal Requires Participation in Tender: Supreme Court Rules in National Highways Authority of India vs. Gwalior Jhansi Expressway Limited (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 17, Contract Law, Contract Law with Right of First Refusal, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges, Tender Process

Supreme Court on Right of First Refusal in Tender Process: National Highways Authority of India vs. Gwalior Jhansi Expressway Limited (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Right of First Refusal (ROFR) can be exercised without participating in a tender process. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Contract Law Case Name: National Highways Authority of India vs. Gwalior Jhansi

Right of First Refusal Requires Participation in Tender: Supreme Court Rules in National Highways Authority of India vs. Gwalior Jhansi Expressway Limited (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petition Dismissed (9 July 2018)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 313, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 391, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 22, Dipak Misra, Fundamental Rights, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petition Dismissed (9 July 2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a criminal conviction based on alleged errors. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Mukesh vs. State of NCT of Delhi Judgment Date: 9 July 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 9 July 2018 Citation: Not available in the source

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petition Dismissed (9 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petitions Dismissed (9 July 2018)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Criminal Appeal, Criminal Law, Dipak Misra, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, R. Banumathi, Review of Judgments, Review Petition, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petitions Dismissed (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of death penalty in a criminal case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Vinay Sharma & Anr. vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Judgment Date: 9 July 2018 Date of the Judgment: 9 July 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges:

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petitions Dismissed (9 July 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top