Dr. AR. Lakshmanan

Supreme Court allows eviction for non-commercial use by Arya Samaj Sewa Sadan: Umed Singh vs. Arya Samaj Sewa Sadan (2006)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 04/07/2006 Citation: Appeal (civil) 6495 of 2005 Judges: Dr. AR. Lakshmanan & Altamas Kabir Can a landlord evict a tenant from a residential building to use the premises for a non-commercial purpose, such as running a public library? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the case of […]

Supreme Court allows eviction for non-commercial use by Arya Samaj Sewa Sadan: Umed Singh vs. Arya Samaj Sewa Sadan (2006) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles liability of partners in firms: Ashutosh vs. State of Rajasthan (30 August 2005)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 30 August 2005 Judges: Ruma Pal & Dr. AR. Lakshmanan Can a partner’s personal assets be used to pay off a firm’s debts? The Supreme Court of India addressed this important question in the case of Ashutosh vs. State of Rajasthan. This case examines the extent to which partners are

Supreme Court settles liability of partners in firms: Ashutosh vs. State of Rajasthan (30 August 2005) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles definition of wages under Employees’ State Insurance Act: ESI Corporation vs. Gnambigai Mills Ltd. (2005)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19th July 2005 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: S.N. Variava and Dr. AR. Lakshmanan In a dispute concerning contributions to the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), the Supreme Court of India addressed whether certain payments made to employees, initially termed as ‘ex-gratia’ in a compromise, should be considered as

Supreme Court settles definition of wages under Employees’ State Insurance Act: ESI Corporation vs. Gnambigai Mills Ltd. (2005) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony: Ram Kishan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2004)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10/09/2004 Judges: K.G. Balakrishnan and Dr. AR. Lakshmanan Can eyewitness testimony alone be sufficient to uphold a murder conviction, even when there are challenges to the medical evidence? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Ram Kishan & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh.

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony: Ram Kishan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2004) Read Post »

Scroll to Top