H. K. Sema

Supreme Court settles seniority rules for Direct Recruits and Departmental Promotees in AFHQ Civil Services: AFHQ/ISOs SOs (DP) Association & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors (2008)

/ Altamas Kabir, Constitutional Law, H. K. Sema, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, Seniority, Service Law, Service Rules

Date of the Judgment: 19th February 2008 Citation: Appeal (civil) 1384 of 2008 Judges: H. K. Sema, Altamas Kabir, Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can the government alter seniority rules to favor one group of employees over another? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a dispute between Direct Recruits (DRs) and Departmental Promotees (DPs) within the […]

Supreme Court settles seniority rules for Direct Recruits and Departmental Promotees in AFHQ Civil Services: AFHQ/ISOs SOs (DP) Association & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Appointment Terms for NCC Officers: Union of India vs. Brahma Dutt Tripathi (2006)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 311, D.K. Jain, H. K. Sema, Judges, National Cadet Corps Act, 1948, National Cadet Corps Act, 1948 with Section 2, National Cadet Corps Act, 1948 with Section 9

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 18th September 2006 Citation: Appeal (civil) 5750 of 2005 Judges: H. K. Sema, J. and D.K. Jain, J. When a Short Service Commission Officer is appointed to the National Cadet Corps (NCC), are they governed by the standard NCC Rules, or by a specific scheme designed for rehabilitating such officers?

Supreme Court Settles Appointment Terms for NCC Officers: Union of India vs. Brahma Dutt Tripathi (2006) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order due to delay in challenging land acquisition: Haryana State Handloom vs. Jain Shool Society (2003)

/ H. K. Sema, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 17, Land Acquisition Act with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, S. N. Variava

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 29th October 2003 Citation: Appeal (civil) 2744 of 2002 Judges: S. N. Variava J, H. K. Sema Can a delay of 22 years in filing a writ petition challenging a land acquisition be excused if the land was not used for its intended purpose? The Supreme Court addressed this critical

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order due to delay in challenging land acquisition: Haryana State Handloom vs. Jain Shool Society (2003) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Official Secrets Act Case: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Jaspal Singh (08 August 2003)

/ Doraiswamy Raju, H. K. Sema, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 10, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 30, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Judges, Official Secrets Act, 1923, Official Secrets Act, 1923 with Section 3, Official Secrets Act, 1923 with Section 5, Official Secrets Act, 1923 with Section 9

Date of the Judgment: 08 August 2003 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, J. and H. K. Sema, J. Can possessing a classified document, even without proof of communication to another party, be sufficient to establish guilt under the Official Secrets Act? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Official Secrets Act Case: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Jaspal Singh (08 August 2003) Read Post »

Scroll to Top