Hima Kohli

Supreme Court Denies Bail in Narcotics Smuggling Case: Ramjhan Gani Palani vs. National Investigating Agency (27 April 2022)

/ Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 121-A, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 122, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 28, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 29, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 30, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act with Section 17, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act with Section 18, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act with Section 20

Supreme Court Denies Bail in Narcotics Smuggling Case: Ramjhan Gani Palani vs. National Investigating Agency (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged with narcotics smuggling, based on the evidence presented. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Ramjhan Gani Palani vs. National Investigating Agency and Anr. Judgment Date: 27 April 2022 Introduction […]

Supreme Court Denies Bail in Narcotics Smuggling Case: Ramjhan Gani Palani vs. National Investigating Agency (27 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 324 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act in Assault Case (22 April 2022)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 27, Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 324, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 324 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act in Assault Case (22 April 2022) Date of the Judgment: 22 April 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 400 Judges: N.V. Ramana, CJI., Krishna Murari, J., Hima Kohli, J. Can a conviction for causing hurt with a firearm be upheld if there are minor

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 324 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act in Assault Case (22 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Imran vs. Mohammed Bhava & Anr. (22 April 2022)

/ Bail, Criminal Procedure, Criminal Procedure with Section 161, Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Imran vs. Mohammed Bhava & Anr. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court correctly granted bail to the accused in a murder case, overlooking the gravity of the offense and available evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Imran vs. Mohammed Bhava & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 22 April 2022

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Imran vs. Mohammed Bhava & Anr. (22 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction of Husband, Acquits In-Laws: Devender Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand (21 April 2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Hima Kohli, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 113B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Related to Marriage

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction of Husband, Acquits In-Laws: Devender Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in reversing the trial court’s acquittal of the accused for offences related to dowry death under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Dowry

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction of Husband, Acquits In-Laws: Devender Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand (21 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case: Jagjeet Singh & Ors vs. Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 2(wa), Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case: Jagjeet Singh & Ors vs. Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a victim has the right to be heard at the stage of adjudication of a bail application of an accused and whether the High Court overlooked relevant considerations while granting bail.

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case: Jagjeet Singh & Ors vs. Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits License Holder in Arms Act Case: Tarlochan Singh vs State of Punjab (29 March 2022)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 29, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 30, Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Acquits License Holder in Arms Act Case: Tarlochan Singh vs State of Punjab (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a licensed gun owner is liable under the Arms Act if their firearm is used in a crime without their knowledge or consent. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Tarlochan Singh @ Rana VERSUS State of

Supreme Court Acquits License Holder in Arms Act Case: Tarlochan Singh vs State of Punjab (29 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits age relaxation for Delhi Judicial Services Exam: High Court of Delhi vs. Devina Sharma (2022)

/ A S Bopanna, Age Relaxation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 233, Constitutional Law with Article 235, Delhi Judicial Service Rules 1970, Delhi Judicial Service Rules 1970 with Rule 14(c), Delhi Judicial Service Rules 1970 with Rule 9(3), Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hima Kohli, Judges, Judicial Service Exams, Service Law

Supreme Court permits age relaxation for Delhi Judicial Services Exam: High Court of Delhi vs. Devina Sharma (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can fix age criteria for judicial service exams, and whether candidates should get age relaxation due to delayed exams. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: High Court of Delhi vs. Devina

Supreme Court permits age relaxation for Delhi Judicial Services Exam: High Court of Delhi vs. Devina Sharma (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Private Land Ownership in Maharashtra Land Dispute: Esteem Properties vs. Chetan Kamble (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Hima Kohli, Judges, Land Ownership, Locus Standi, Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, Maintainability of PIL, N.V. Ramana, Property Law, Property Law with Section 258, Public Interest Litigation

Supreme Court Upholds Private Land Ownership in Maharashtra Land Dispute: Esteem Properties vs. Chetan Kamble (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is maintainable in a dispute regarding the title of a property between a private party and the State. CASE TYPE: Property Law, Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Esteem Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Supreme Court Upholds Private Land Ownership in Maharashtra Land Dispute: Esteem Properties vs. Chetan Kamble (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows NCLT proceedings to continue in Future Coupons vs. Amazon Dispute (15 February 2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Enforcement of Awards, Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 230, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 232, Emergency Arbitrator, Hima Kohli, Judges, N.V. Ramana, National Company Law Tribunal

Supreme Court Allows NCLT Proceedings to Continue in Future Coupons vs. Amazon Dispute (15 February 2022) Date of the Judgment: 15 February 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: N.V. Ramana (Chief Justice of India), A.S. Bopanna (Justice), Hima Kohli (Justice). The Supreme Court addressed the question of whether to allow the National Company Law

Supreme Court allows NCLT proceedings to continue in Future Coupons vs. Amazon Dispute (15 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court orders in Amazon-Future dispute: Future Coupons vs. Amazon (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 17, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XXXIX Rule 2A, Contempt Proceedings, Hima Kohli, Interim Measures, Judges, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court orders in Amazon-Future dispute: Future Coupons vs. Amazon (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Delhi High Court’s orders enforcing an Emergency Arbitrator’s award were valid, and whether the High Court followed principles of natural justice. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Future Coupons Private Limited & Ors. vs. Amazon.com NV

Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court orders in Amazon-Future dispute: Future Coupons vs. Amazon (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Dispute: Intercontinental Hotels vs. Waterline Hotels (25 January 2022)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Hima Kohli, Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 2, Judges, Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 with Article 5, Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 with Section 34, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Dispute: Intercontinental Hotels vs. Waterline Hotels (25 January 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration agreement within an unstamped or insufficiently stamped contract is valid and enforceable. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Waterline Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Judgment Date: 25 January

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Dispute: Intercontinental Hotels vs. Waterline Hotels (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration Act, 1940, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 30, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Contract Termination, Hima Kohli, Judges, Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards, Mitigation of Damages, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, by re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view on contract interpretation. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Contract Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top